Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Different Style Twin Turbos
-
01-02-2006 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Jacksonville, NC
- Posts
- 208
Different Style Twin Turbos
Hey guys,
I see this kind of diesel setup for twin turbos. What are the differences between a regular turbo setup(benefits/downsides).

For those of you that are having a hard time figuring out what is going on, the exhaust outlet of one turbo is feeding the other, pretty much it is piggybacking off of the other turbo.
Thanks guys,
Derek
-
01-02-2006 #2
Starting The Transformation
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- SoCal
- Posts
- 489
Compounding turbos like that, where they feed off of and into each other is only for making SERIOUS boost pressures. Your talking 80-200 psi easy, and it's completely not needed on a street car.
01-02-2006 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Posts
- 609
IMO that's flat out dumb. If you need that kind of boost and what not you should do a super turbo (blower/turbo combo) You're choking it out, creating more back pressure, unneeded plumbing... damn.. so many things.
01-02-2006 #4
Starting The Transformation
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- SoCal
- Posts
- 489
Problem is running that much boost through a pos displacement blower creates a TON of heat and gets very very inefficient. That is not something you run on a gas motor, it's all diesel stuff. And while it does create backpressure the ratio between backpressure and inlet pressure is right inline with what it would be on a regular single. Thus why cam overlap and timing is SOO critical with big boost turbo motors.
Originally Posted by Matt
To make 150psi with a big roots blower would eat 600hp at least, that and finding a blower to feed a monster diesel is difficult at best. Not to mention it would weigh a ton and you'd always have belt issues.
Look at all the big tractor diesels, all turbo, competition diesel tractor pullers, all compounded turbos. And they do blow the blocks apart from time to time.
01-02-2006 #5



Reply With Quote