Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 7 of 7

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      For best results, install within 2" of the collector merge. As a matter of fact, a lot of OEMs run shorty headers with the narrow band right at the collector. A couple of reasons for this:

      First, it has to reach a minimum temperature (typically over 600F) to operate accurately. The second reason has to do with response-delay. If you're datalogging, you want the sensor to pick up the signal as close to the combustion event timing as possible. That way the reading point is showing true to the speed/load point being compared. In other words, by the time the exhaust pulses reach the sensor, you could be one combustion cycle set behind if it's too far downstream. At high rpm, there's only milliseconds between engine rotations. And long tube headers are already... well... very long.



      And, the further you put it upstream from the header collector/exhaust pipe sealing joint, the less likely you'll get bad readings if there's a slight leak. (The extra oxygen would show up as a false lean condition, or maybe cause the values to bounce around intermittently).
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Orange County, CA
      Posts
      675
      Thanks for the info, so pretty much where I circled is where I want the sensor? I’ll make sure to install it at the correct angle. Fortunately and unfortunately, I need to have the header recoated anyhow, so adding a bung in the header isn’t terrible.
      Attached Images Attached Images  




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com