Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 13 of 13

    Thread: SBC/BBC vs ls

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2008
      Location
      San Francisco California
      Posts
      14
      Country Flag: United States

      SBC/BBC vs ls

      How many prefer original cast iron blocks vs going LS. I know about the buildability of the LS But wondering who still prefer old school maybe with a efi system on it.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Fredericksburg, VA.
      Posts
      3,164
      Country Flag: United States
      Steve Hayes
      "Dust Off"
      68 Camaro

      Support the RPM Act
      https://www.sema.org/rpm-faq.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2013
      Location
      San Diego
      Posts
      275
      Country Flag: United States
      I think the answer depends on what you are looking to do with your car.
      Brian

      1972 C10 - 454/TH400 - Short bed conversion - https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...1972-C10-SoCal
      1970 Nova - LS Swap - https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...Cal?highlight=



    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Appleton WI
      Posts
      377
      Country Flag: United States
      Got a 600hp 575 ft/lbs BBC in my 68 and am addicted to torque but EVENTUALLY going to an LS. I've ridden in comparable vehicles with LS engines and the same torque numbers just don't feel as..........violent as the BBC. Now that I'm getting older though, the convenience of an LS engine is hard to ignore. Even with a fuel injected set-up, it's still not as friendly to drive as an LS. :/

      Jim
      1968 Camaro --502HO, ATI 10" TreeMaster, Hughes TH400 with Gear Vendor's OD, Moser 12-bolt, RideTech StrongArms and MuscleBar, Chris Alston G-bar rear suspension, 2 1/8" by 4" Lemon's Headers through 3" Pypes X-pipe and Hooker AeroChambers.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Dec 2012
      Posts
      456
      Country Flag: Canada
      Jim add some boost and ... 550 RW Torque at 2000 rpm is insanity and violent as hell, you CAN have your cake and eat it too
      Just cost $$$$ LOL

      Steve
      Build it right ... 'The 2nd Time !!'
      69' SS/RS X11 PRO-TOURING E-Force LS7 - SOLD
      2 Custom FJ40's -SOLD
      77' 911 Hotrod - SOLD
      'Killer Piggy' 73 FJ55
      67 Camaro - TBD

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Appleton WI
      Posts
      377
      Country Flag: United States
      LOL! It's only money right!

      Jim
      1968 Camaro --502HO, ATI 10" TreeMaster, Hughes TH400 with Gear Vendor's OD, Moser 12-bolt, RideTech StrongArms and MuscleBar, Chris Alston G-bar rear suspension, 2 1/8" by 4" Lemon's Headers through 3" Pypes X-pipe and Hooker AeroChambers.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      284
      The 300hp weight difference between BBC and LS is significant, if it's truly for a pro-touring car. SBC to LS, not so much.
      70 GTO - Alum 5.3/4L80e, 7875
      17 GT350

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Southern Indiana
      Posts
      4,709
      Country Flag: United States
      I can push sbc/bbc pretty hard for cheap, cost of non distributor/ non carbed oem engine swap adds significant cost. Hei and rebuilt carb cost much less than LS ignition alone.Then you get into headers, mounts, accessory drives, etc.
      Lee Abel
      AFTERMARKET PERFORMANCE

      1977 Chevy Monza 2+2:Project "Cheap Trick"
      1978 C10 Long bed , On air and trailer puller
      2006 Buell Blast ,Just a bike to ride and for mileage
      1966 Caprice 4dr Sports Roof fact.327/now 350/SOON 454???? Project "II Old,,,ZERO BUDGET OR LESS CAPRICE!"

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jul 2013
      Posts
      120
      Country Flag: United States
      5mpg vs 20mpg

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2013
      Location
      Shelton WA
      Posts
      152
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm in the same boat right now. Love the brute power of a built BBC but don't want the extra weight on the nose of the car. Love the LS engines but the cost of integrating one into my car just isn't feasible at this point. So for now a SBC is my best option. My car already has one so I need nothing to install a upgraded one.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jan 2016
      Location
      Vista Ca
      Posts
      28
      Country Flag: United States
      Hard to beat a 427 or 434 small block. I love the availability of cheap parts. Not so uneconomical if built right.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2016
      Posts
      241
      Besides the initial swap cost, cost to make similar power is about the same, between the two.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Sep 2014
      Location
      Sun City West, AZ
      Posts
      672
      Country Flag: United States
      Instead of putting a LS in my 89 C4 Corvette, I decided to stay with a SBC design and went with an all aluminum Dart block for the weight savings. Lingenfelter built a 427 ci with 646 up at the crank and will spin up to 7600. The engine was designed for autocrossing and I am glad I stayed with the Gen 1 family engine. The Dart block will be a lot more durable than a factory LS block.
      --
      Kenny Mitchell
      [email protected]




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com