Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 25

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Posts
      1,869

      Fuel line routing questions

      Hi gen 1 camaro ls3 ... Using Ptfe hose and a a vapor worx return less system.

      first question I was considering running fuel line aprons the back of the engine. Specifically using resting clips that will bolt to the bellhouing. (Quick time so not to worried about the clutch coming apart and that being dangerous. So what concerns me about that location is the exhaust headers. The line will have to go over the top of them. thoughts or pictures of a si liar setup appreciated



      second question ... If I run the line attached to the inside of the chassis it will end up real close to the mufflers eventually. If I run on the outer side of the chassis (think after market subframe And farm connectors) it will end up coming out by the lower suspension arm (where the leaf spring perch is) so what to do? Pics or ideas appreciated
      From a place you will not see comes a sound you will not hear....

      67 Camaro In progress

      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...-Tap-67-camaro


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2010
      Location
      Seattle area
      Posts
      360
      No you keep it on the outside the frame ,and away from the heat.Just like the factory does.There is a reason why the factory does this.For safety and to keep the fuel from vapor locking.I run a 1/2 fuel line with Adel Clamps. on my 1979 Z-28 RS Camaro .Because it has a Supercharged small block Chevy.and it heeds the fuel volume.And if you are worried about the clutch exploding .I would get good quality clutch set up with a steel flywheel.And a scatter shield.Protect thy feet.
      Attached Images Attached Images  

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      Rockvale TN
      Posts
      402
      Country Flag: United States
      He had already stated he had a scatter shield bellhousing.

      Just ran mine the other day in the El Camino. They are run inboard of the frame to the point of the bell housing, then in/out of the frame and between the inner and outer fender. The 327 being a solid lifter engine I did not want to have to deal with lines running over the valve covers.


    4. #4
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      Don't over think it. Use the stock line and routing

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Posts
      1,869
      Name:  image.jpeg
Views: 4542
Size:  102.8 KBA picture of the problem.. This is not my car but same suspension. Notice if he ran a standard shaped muffler it wold be much closer to the fuel line
      From a place you will not see comes a sound you will not hear....

      67 Camaro In progress

      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...-Tap-67-camaro

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      yes but he also has 3 or 4 hoses there from the looks of it. What is the size of your stock metal fuel line? you are only running one line from the gas tank to the engine.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Posts
      1,869
      Quote Originally Posted by icemanrd19 View Post
      yes but he also has 3 or 4 hoses there from the looks of it. What is the size of your stock metal fuel line? you are only running one line from the gas tank to the engine.
      Yes he is running a return I have a single -6 line to deal with. One of my concers is that the line is over the frame and exposed .. So I could just do it like the picture and get some shielding for the muffler and hose But I was curious what others thought. Also curious about running it behind the engine ... That used to be a big no.. No but that was also in the days when hose was less advanced than today
      From a place you will not see comes a sound you will not hear....

      67 Camaro In progress

      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...-Tap-67-camaro

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Appleton WI
      Posts
      377
      Country Flag: United States
      I ran mine up through the sub frame connector and then through the frame rail all the way to the front of the passengers side frame rail horn. It's worked since 2009 but makes me nervous enough that I plan to change it. I ran -6 feed and return and I wonder if my boiling fuel issue was because of being insulated inside of the rails and out of the airstream.
      I bought a 3/8" stainless line with FI ends and 2' extra length on the engine end that runs where the stock line ran.

      The old reasons why your choice of line routing were a big no-go haven't changed. The new lines are no more resistant to catastrophic damage than the old ones. If you plan to run it on the track, check their rules while in the planning stages.

      Jim
      1968 Camaro --502HO, ATI 10" TreeMaster, Hughes TH400 with Gear Vendor's OD, Moser 12-bolt, RideTech StrongArms and MuscleBar, Chris Alston G-bar rear suspension, 2 1/8" by 4" Lemon's Headers through 3" Pypes X-pipe and Hooker AeroChambers.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      Why not run the line up the LH side of the car?
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Posts
      1,869
      Quote Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
      Why not run the line up the LH side of the car?
      Doesn't really save me much because swapping the fuel rail can get me the feed line on pass side.

      Plus my tank has this nifty attachment point for a bracket to hold the line on the passenger side only :-)

      It is an option though if I need to go that way .
      From a place you will not see comes a sound you will not hear....

      67 Camaro In progress

      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...-Tap-67-camaro

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      here is the underside



      here is where the fuel line comes up but i actually went under my foot panel so its hidden



      Heres mine where you can't see the line

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Oct 2011
      Posts
      124
      This is a great subject and I am very interested as I am getting ready to route a single ptfe hose as well. My plan is to use a Brown and Miller Racing hose with their heat resistant coating. Curious as to minimal clearance from headers to hose as I planned to go across firewall from frame and come in from behind the engine and take a 90 elbow into fuel rail.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      Rockvale TN
      Posts
      402
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by fishface View Post
      This is a great subject and I am very interested as I am getting ready to route a single ptfe hose as well. My plan is to use a Brown and Miller Racing hose with their heat resistant coating. Curious as to minimal clearance from headers to hose as I planned to go across firewall from frame and come in from behind the engine and take a 90 elbow into fuel rail.
      I thought about doing the same on the El Camino, but decided to approach it from the front instead. I don't think efi has as much problem with heat soak as carbs, but I am running a return also. Another benefit coming in from the front is it will make it easier to add a regulator down the road if I make any changes.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      why are you all using hose from the tank to the engine? Seems expensive. Use the stock line and when you get to the engine bend it over behind the engine and its hidden. run a foot long hose from the metal line to the gas tank and another from the metal line to the fuel rail. Stop overthinking all of this. Stock brake lines on the left side and stock fuel line on the right side

      http://www.firewheelclassics.com/sto...=&SKU=FGLLINES


    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      294
      Country Flag: United States
      I have been thru this also... sometimes I tend to overthink things. All I did was use a stock 3/8 steel line to run most of the length of the frame, where it got close to the exhaust area I used some of the black 3/8 DEI insulation and used the rubber that comes with it to seal the ends.
      Never had a fuel delivery problem.
      Tom

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Posts
      1,869
      Well my stock line went the way of the dumpster about 5 years ago.... that said I have the PTFE and dont mind spending $$ on this project..
      SO the orange car regardless of line type has the same thing I was asking about.. passing the line over the frame...
      The Yellow car has the fuel rail swapped.. also a thing I asked about.. and on your car since you are using the OE line I guess you are picking it up were the OE fuel pump would be.. thats one of my thoughts.. run the ptfe in the fender well with the AC line and end up down by the OE fuel pump.. have a bulkhead there and plumb the motor on the stand to connect to that bulkhead.
      From a place you will not see comes a sound you will not hear....

      67 Camaro In progress

      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...-Tap-67-camaro

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      Mines ran just like the yellow except I didn't go up on the firewall it's under the floor board there. Then I ran a line from the hard line to my fuel rail. If I wanted to use the stock fuel rail I could and it would be quick. Replace the flex line between my Hardline and fuel rail with a longer one. I like the idea of using metal stock lines for the long part of the car

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      294
      Country Flag: United States
      Not to take this off target but what are you going to run for a fuel pump? Im just finishing up on my installation of Carl's vaporworx setup, my goal was slowing the pump down when not needed to help with heat.
      Nice build thread.
      Tom

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      dallas, tx
      Posts
      1,731
      Country Flag: United States
      ^^^^^^^ why?

      K.I.S.S

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,848
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by icemanrd19 View Post
      ^^^^^^^ why?

      K.I.S.S
      To avoid dumping unnecessary heat into the fuel when idling and cruising. To prolong fuel pump life and improve reliability. There are many good reasons why GM uses pwm control of their fuel pumps. There is a lot to learn from them that we can use in our cars. They are not stupid by any means. Nor are folks using the vaporworx PWM controller....

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com