Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
    Results 81 to 100 of 100
    1. #81
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      152
      i use to be refured to as Pimp touring on here.



    2. #82
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      NW Arkansas
      Posts
      1,742
      Quote Originally Posted by slownova
      i use to be refured to as Pimp touring on here.

      well thats not all bad if it's true lol I've been called much worse
      KENNY DAVIS HOTRODS

    3. #83
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      26

      Isn't the question rotating weight mass?

      I have never seen anyone speak to what the "optimum" or "maximum advisable" weight of a wheel/tire combo would be.


      Isn't that the real issue here (other than how they ultimately look)?

      The overall diameter or width of the tire doesn't seem to be the issue. That is generally the biggest you can fit and since a 265 is a 265 whether it is 18" or 20",,,,,,

      There could be a sidewall issue, but that is not what you hear when somebody says "that size (bigger than 18") will destroy your performance.

      I bet there are even 18" combo's that are heavier (and thus worse for performance??) than a well selected 20" combo.

      But nobody seems to talk about what the target weight should be. But I bet those Formula 1 guys figure that out...

      Am I off base?

      Let a brotha' know.

      For the record I am looking for 20's that aren't purely Bling Bling,,,but I will never race my convertible. And I agree that some of these wheel combo's are ugly if they show puny brakes or the car is dumped over the top of them.
      Calicraig

      67 Camaro SS Convertible
      Frame off project started September 2005

      Had a 69 Z28 clone back in the 80's
      Still kicking myself for getting rid of it

    4. #84
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Arvada, Co
      Posts
      2,119
      Country Flag: United States
      Calicraig,

      This has been discussed before. It has been a while, but if you did some searching I am sure you could did it up. A few months ago Johnny Hunkins wrote his editorial about this very subject.

      The glaring pitfall of larger diameter rims for performance is the larger polar moment of inertia. I am sure there are 18s that are heavier than 20s, but not if the material they are made of is the same. A 20" billet Al wheel will outweigh a 18" billet Al wheel everytime and twice on Sunday. A 20" forged Al wheel could weight about the same and a 18" billet Al wheel. I am not sure. It really does not matter. If they weigh the same and have the same tires the 18s will outperform the 20s purely due to the different polar moments between the two.

      If you like the look of the 20s then by all means get them. It is not the look that I care for, but that is just me. Just do not think that bigger is better for perfomance in this case.
      Brian


      I have an unlimited budget. That bad part is I have already used it up.

    5. #85
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      February issue of PHR has a story on Moment Of Inertia.. It's written by Vizard so you know it's good.. touches on flywheels mostly but also discusses wheels.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    6. #86
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by calicraig
      I have never seen anyone speak to what the "optimum" or "maximum advisable" weight of a wheel/tire combo would be.


      Isn't that the real issue here (other than how they ultimately look)?

      The overall diameter or width of the tire doesn't seem to be the issue. That is generally the biggest you can fit and since a 265 is a 265 whether it is 18" or 20",,,,,,

      There could be a sidewall issue, but that is not what you hear when somebody says "that size (bigger than 18") will destroy your performance.

      I bet there are even 18" combo's that are heavier (and thus worse for performance??) than a well selected 20" combo.

      But nobody seems to talk about what the target weight should be. But I bet those Formula 1 guys figure that out...

      Am I off base?

      Let a brotha' know.

      For the record I am looking for 20's that aren't purely Bling Bling,,,but I will never race my convertible. And I agree that some of these wheel combo's are ugly if they show puny brakes or the car is dumped over the top of them.
      It's not the weight of the wheel.. it is how far that weight is from the center of the wheel. As the weight moves away from the hub it's effect is exponential.

      It's ok to go with 20's if that is what you like, the important part is to have a firm understanding of the forces involved so that you know what you are compromising from a performance standpoint.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    7. #87
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Cookeville, TN
      Posts
      159
      Country Flag: United States
      I just saw the first picture of a '69 with 20's that looks great, it makes me wish I had chose them vs my 18's. Check out the black '69 in the latest "Chevy Rumble" magazine. Those TT's with grey spokes look so good!

    8. #88
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      26

      I see I have more research to do

      I also love that sticky with the wheel weights posted,,,,

      Food for thought. At least you guys are giving actual technical answers instead of just dismissing that approach as "stoopid". I saw that alot on TEAM CAMARO.

      So basically the barrel of the larger (20") rim will account for an expediential increase in rotating mass being farther away from the center would cause the increase strain on braking capability, as well as a "pushing" affect on the suspension set up?

      That my friends is some major MOO GOO GUI PAN.... I am full of it...Having a great day hangin' with you guys....
      Calicraig

      67 Camaro SS Convertible
      Frame off project started September 2005

      Had a 69 Z28 clone back in the 80's
      Still kicking myself for getting rid of it

    9. #89
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Mchenry, IL
      Posts
      219

      viper combo

      i would have to say the new vipers have the performance aspects down pretty well. im looking at putting my second gen on a 18/19 combo. now i don't think anyone can say they don't look good with the larger (19") rims. i know we are talking about old school cars with "dubs" but is not the point of pro-tourning to mix old and new?? It always comes down to personal preference you like it, put it on and the hell with everyone else.


      As for the rim weight issues.....add more power and the issue is gone
      HE WHO DIES WITH THE MOST TOYS WINS!!!

      2012 Camaro ZL1 M6
      1978 Camaro Z-28 C5 Corvette Hybrid
      1999 Jeep Wrangler
      2004 Acura TL
      2002 Chevy Silverado

    10. #90
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by calicraig
      So basically the barrel of the larger (20") rim will account for an expediential increase in rotating mass being farther away from the center would cause the increase strain on braking capability, as well as a "pushing" affect on the suspension set up?
      ....
      Yes.. as the mass moves farther from the center of hte hub it has a greater affect on braking and overall performance.. There is a good story in the Feb issue of PHR on "moment of inertia"..

      Puttion on 20's is NOT stupid, it's a choice and so long as you make an informed choice then all the better. The problem comes when people put on 20's (or bigger) and have no idea that this will hurt thier performance. So long as you know the pros and cons then more power to ya
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    11. #91
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by OneslowZ28
      i would have to say the new vipers have the performance aspects down pretty well. im looking at putting my second gen on a 18/19 combo. now i don't think anyone can say they don't look good with the larger (19") rims. i know we are talking about old school cars with "dubs" but is not the point of pro-tourning to mix old and new?? It always comes down to personal preference you like it, put it on and the hell with everyone else.


      As for the rim weight issues.....add more power and the issue is gone
      More power won't make your car stop better.. and the point is that even a modern viper would perform better with smaller wheels, it's physics.. They went with 19's cause it looks better and lets face it, most people with new cars are NOT going to take them to the track or car about being a second or two slower on a road track.

      Build what you like but know what you are building..
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    12. #92
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,118
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
      It's not the weight of the wheel.. it is how far that weight is from the center of the wheel. As the weight moves away from the hub it's effect is exponential.
      Wheel weight is only a small part. The major issue is the tire weight combined with the diameter.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    13. #93
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by andrewb70
      Wheel weight is only a small part. The major issue is the tire weight combined with the diameter.

      Andrew
      Well we were talking wheels.. but yes.. all the weight is worse the farther it gets from the hub.. bub.. lol
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    14. #94
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Mesa, AZ
      Posts
      133
      I havent read all the posts here yet but from what I have read I felt compelled to take a stab at the ol polar moment of inertia thing. Your 18" wheel/tire and your 20" wheel/tire could weigh exactly the same but since the 20"er has a bigger diameter, meaning more weight is farther from the center, it will take more force to change its velocity, whether accellerating or braking. Take for example your trusty pneumatic cut off tool. With a new disc in all its 3" glory it spins up slower than the 1" worn out disc you just switched from. same goes for your wheels, it works both ways slowing down and speeding up. Basically Moment of inertia is the ability of a body to resist or store energy that would cause that body to rotate, not by friction, but by weight and its distance from the point that the body rotates about. Correct me if Im wrong here....and if I am thats really scary because I just took a class on this.

      That being said. 20" wheels will look killer if done right, but the added diameter will tend to hurt performance in braking and accelleration, and your car will coast longer when you let off the gas while cruising. This probably isnt a concern on a street car because you are concerned about looks not how to beat the other guys lap time.
      Hopefully this all made sense...We are not trying to change the subject about whether or not your wheels will fit, we just want you to understand what all will be influenced by this change in wheel diameter

      *EDIT-now that I actually have read all posts here, I know that my information was mostly repeat...sorry...I learned my lesson

    15. #95
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,118
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
      Well we were talking wheels.. but yes.. all the weight is worse the farther it gets from the hub.. bub.. lol
      Since you can't really run wheels without tires its probably best to consider them as a package.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    16. #96
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by andrewb70
      Since you can't really run wheels without tires its probably best to consider them as a package.

      Andrew
      One could also say that since you can't run one without the other that it sould be obvious about the tires.. :p
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    17. #97
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,118
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
      One could also say that since you can't run one without the other that it sould be obvious about the tires.. :p
      It should be obvious, but many times people focus on wheel weight and forget to look at the actual tire weight.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    18. #98
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Posts
      36
      Does any one out there still have any pictures or a link to Scott Whidby's black camaro with 22"?

    19. #99
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      ROBBIEVILLE
      Posts
      263
      Country Flag: Great Britain

      22 s on back and 19 in front

      not into camero s but this guy when nuts on the wheels

      wondering what kind they are - intro custom wheels v rod 5 ?
      1966 GTO HELL BEAST PROJECT

    20. #100
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      Georgetown,TX
      Posts
      2,557
      Quote Originally Posted by MarkM66
      I think I may be the original poser! YES!!!!!!!!!! In your faces!!!
      Vintage 1999 baby! 18's and 20's on a first gen. Top that!!!

      http://home.earthlink.net/imagelib/s...target=tlx_new

      They spelled my name wrong. But that was probably a good thing. As I'm sure people were trying to hunt me down and castrate me for such an ungodly act!
      I installed some 18x8 & 20x10 TT II's with Michelin Pilots on my former 68 El Camino in early 1998. Took me four months just to find some rear tires. Click on my sig and scroll down to see some photos of the car that we owned for 32 years. With Global West,Koni, & Hotchkis suspension parts and four wheel Baer brakes,it was a good start to another protouring ride. Unfortunately,my wife suffered a stroke later that year and I ended up having to sell it to pay off some huge medical debts.

    Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com