Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2014
      Location
      Harrisburg, PA
      Posts
      172
      Country Flag: United States

      tubular upper control arm suggestions

      I want to put tubular uppers on my 72 Camaro, looking for suggestions on a good set that won't completely break the bank. I am doing this as much for looks as anything as I don't race or autocross the car.

      I appreciate any input.

      These look pretty good.

      http://www.jegs.com/i/QA1/122/52418/10002/-1



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2012
      Location
      Woodstock, IL
      Posts
      2,410
      Country Flag: United States

      tubular upper control arm suggestions

      If you're doing it for looks then any brand will be fine including those QA1 arms. If you're looking for a little better handling then ridetech is a good choice.
      -Dale
      SchwartzPerformance
      The leader in bolt-in muscle car chassis
      SchwartzPerformance.com | GMachineChassis.com | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

      Dealer for: Forgeline, RideTech, Tremec, American Powertrain, Silver Sport Transmissions, GM Performance Parts, RECARO, Cerullo Seats, TMI Products, Vintage Air, Baer Brakes, Wilwood, BeCool, AFCO, Tanks Inc, Holley / Hooker, Ultimate Headers, Rick's Tanks, Moser Engineering, Currie, TechAFX, Stainless Works, II Much Fabrication, and many more

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2014
      Location
      Harrisburg, PA
      Posts
      172
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks Dale! Obviously better handling would be nice, I have Hotchkis springs front and back and Bilstien shocks all the way around so the car does handle well. i just trying to say that I am not putting the car under a lot of corner loads or anything like that that I would need top of the line stuff.

      I appreciate your input and will look at the Ridetechs.

      Pat

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2014
      Location
      Harrisburg, PA
      Posts
      172
      Country Flag: United States
      refering to these Dale??

      http://www.jegs.com/i/ridetech/029/11173699/10002/-1

      Dale,

      maybe I could give you a ring sometime, I see your a dealer for the Ridetch and QA..

      Pat

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2012
      Location
      Woodstock, IL
      Posts
      2,410
      Country Flag: United States
      Yep, those. QA1's seem to be just a copy of the factory design which is why they're inexpensive.

      No problem, glad to give you a quote and/or help you out.

      -Dale
      SchwartzPerformance
      The leader in bolt-in muscle car chassis
      SchwartzPerformance.com | GMachineChassis.com | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

      Dealer for: Forgeline, RideTech, Tremec, American Powertrain, Silver Sport Transmissions, GM Performance Parts, RECARO, Cerullo Seats, TMI Products, Vintage Air, Baer Brakes, Wilwood, BeCool, AFCO, Tanks Inc, Holley / Hooker, Ultimate Headers, Rick's Tanks, Moser Engineering, Currie, TechAFX, Stainless Works, II Much Fabrication, and many more

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Posts
      49,371
      Country Flag: United States
      If you are just doing this for looks, I suggest not doing it at all and saving the $$. An A-Arm is not really a show-off piece. If you were talking about a performance aspect, I would say, yes, go for ours or any reputable company Arms.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      Katy,TX
      Posts
      1,678
      Global West as well as SC&C and F Body Pro-touring all also make them.

      Some have a "cant" to the upper ball joint platform area like the factory ones some are staight parallel to the cross shaft-not sure if that affects the ronge of motion of the ball joint but that is the one big design difference I've noticed.
      1978 Black Trans Am 455 Edelbrock heads [email protected] through mufflers on pump gas
      1981 Trans Am 400 stock type motor
      79 Camaro getting a 500" 695 hp IA2 Pontiac motor
      1965 GTO project car
      470ci/Chevy dual quad 409 604 HP 64 Impala SS project
      2004 Pulse Red GTO

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2014
      Posts
      15
      Country Flag: Canada
      Question for you guys, is there a reason most aftermarket arms come with poly bushings and not steel or Delrin? I thought it was recommended to stay away from poly bushings on control arms?

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Ottawa
      Posts
      51
      Country Flag: Canada

      Upper ball joint plate angle.

      Those QA1 arms appear to have a ball joint plate that is closer to being on plane with the cross shaft pivots than the factory arm. This makes them better suited to taller spindles or lower spring heights. I imagine the designer had lowering springs in mind.
      Kevin Murray
      72 Skylark

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Posts
      49,371
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Colin70ta View Post
      Question for you guys, is there a reason most aftermarket arms come with poly bushings and not steel or Delrin? I thought it was recommended to stay away from poly bushings on control arms?
      I would say a number of Reasons. #1 Poly is fine for most applications (our Arms have a Zerk Fitting so you can keep them Greased). #2 is Price Point - Delrin Bushings are a lot more expensive than Poly. Like it or not, we have to compete with Chinese Junk which is priced very low. Not as much on this Forum, but on others it's a Constant Battle to educate people of the why to buy American!




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com