Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
    Results 21 to 40 of 68
    1. #21
      Join Date
      Nov 2012
      Posts
      346
      Country Flag: United States
      This build makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, but why do I find myself so intrigued? I must stay tuned in to see what the heck happens!
      _______________
      1969 Camaro
      1966 Skylark
      1964 Lemans
      1960 Biscayne
      Steve

    2. #22
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Georgetown/Austin, TX
      Posts
      307
      Country Flag: United States
      Whoa...SERIOUS props on your fabrication skills. I can't wait to see how this turns out!

    3. #23
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      HAHAHA Thanks guys. I am continuously laughing at this build, myself. Why the HELL would someone do this? ESPECIALLY with this car? A lot of this build doesn't make sense because it started as a joke and the further i got into it the more i realized "Oh that won't work, i MIGHT as well do this too while I'm at it....". The plan has changed 14 times from the start till now.

    4. #24
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      So I torched the crap off the frame and installed my new control arms. You can see my original shock mounts were cool looking but they had to go, in favor of some round tube. I had minor clearance issues with the steering linkage that could have been alleviated but I also had a brand new power steering rack in my storage box.







      Big Moment!!!! Finally rolled outside on all new suspension. The front currently has no shocks installed but MAN does it look GREAT!!!!




    5. #25
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      I am now realizing this car is not really a joke anymore and the only major, ugly part of the build is the headlight panel that has been completely mangled. It was clearly in an accident at some point and when it was repaired they updated the front end to the newer headlights. This of course meant torching new bolt holes in the sheet metal. I couldn't stand looking at them any longer so i chopped them right off to make my own.










    6. #26
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      SW KS
      Posts
      162
      Country Flag: United States
      I love the stance, and forgive my ignorance, but doesn't ideal suspension geometry require that the front LCA's be parallel or above for proper handling?

      Still, mad props and much love for this build. Its so obscure, and for some reason, I've always loved the 1st gen Camry. I had a chance to own a 4 door hatchback Camry a couple years ago, and I kick myself every day for not picking it up.

      Will you be going back to the stock headlights or something....different?

      Chris

    7. #27
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by cbpldc View Post
      I love the stance, and forgive my ignorance, but doesn't ideal suspension geometry require that the front LCA's be parallel or above for proper handling?

      Still, mad props and much love for this build. Its so obscure, and for some reason, I've always loved the 1st gen Camry. I had a chance to own a 4 door hatchback Camry a couple years ago, and I kick myself every day for not picking it up.

      Will you be going back to the stock headlights or something....different?

      Chris
      Thanks! There is a LOT involved when it comes to proper suspension geometry. The picture you see is the suspension fully compressed. Even if that were at ride height, it would essentially just drop my roll center height. This would make the car have more body roll but the control arms would influence the chassis less over irregular surfaces. If the Roll Center Height is too low, you can add and tune a swaybar to combat roll stiffness but if the Roll Center Height is too high, there is nothing that can be done. I am essentially leaving myself room to tune later down the road instead of doing a bunch of theoretical figuring on a suspension calculator and hoping it works in real life.

      I really only wanted this Camry because it was unique being a turbo diesel. I am keeping the headlights that were on it when i purchased the car.

    8. #28
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      SW KS
      Posts
      162
      Country Flag: United States
      Awesome! Thanks for addressing my question. I learned something today.

      Chris

    9. #29
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by cbpldc View Post
      Awesome! Thanks for addressing my question. I learned something today.

      Chris
      You got it!

      Even though there is no anti-roll bar in the rear, the rear control arms act as a anti-roll bar. I intentionally raised my roll center height in the rear and kept the front low to make the car loose. I imagine i will likely need a soft bar up front to help keep it from 3 wheeling but we'll see once i start hammering on it.

    10. #30
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      So, I finally decided on a power plant for this cute little bugger. I always have a handful of LSx engines kicking around and for no REAL good reason i had been trying not to stuff one in this car but... here we are! A low mile 4.8L truck motor.



      I can't give away ALL my secrets but I am currently in the process of casting my own bellhousing adapter to use an MA-5/AR-5 AISIN WARNER Transmission. It is sized specifically to use a factory Chevy Colorado or Camaro hydraulic slave cylinder with an LS1 clutch on a truck flywheel. This will let anyone put a fairly robust transmission behind their LS1/LSx engine for less than half the cost it would to use a T56. The supra guys put 1,000hp through them but a 2JZGTE doesn't pack that low end punch an LSx does so I expect this transmission to hold up to a stock-mild LSX. We'll find out pretty soon.





      Almost looks like it was made for this car... Almost

    11. #31
      Join Date
      Jul 2011
      Location
      Prescott, AZ
      Posts
      206
      Country Flag: United States
      This escalated quickly. Looking forward to seeing where this goes.

    12. #32
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      SW KS
      Posts
      162
      Country Flag: United States
      Ooh! Nice. I just finished reading where HotRod magazine pulled a junkyard 4.8 (they thought it was a 5.3) and with upgraded fueling and a good head porting they made over 60+ dyno pulls in excess of 1000 HP with a turbo kit.

      Just planting a seed....

    13. #33
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Centerforce View Post
      This escalated quickly. Looking forward to seeing where this goes.
      NO KIDDING! on the escalating quickly part!!!

      Quote Originally Posted by cbpldc View Post
      Ooh! Nice. I just finished reading where HotRod magazine pulled a junkyard 4.8 (they thought it was a 5.3) and with upgraded fueling and a good head porting they made over 60+ dyno pulls in excess of 1000 HP with a turbo kit.

      Just planting a seed....
      hahahahah I am very familiar with that article and turboing the LSx engines but your internet voodoo is not going to work on me! This car isn't even supposed to be as nice as it is! I am supposed to just slap it together, weld it where it touches, fill gaps and ship it out the door. I have no desire to turbocharge a Toyota Camry.

    14. #34
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      I got out the grinder and a hand file to whip up this transmission mount.







      FINALLY starting to feel like a real car again! There is an optical illusion. The car actually sits level but the front wheel well is far larger than the rear. I was pretty close guessing my spring rates but i have my fingers crossed that these things sag out or the rest of the car weighs enough to drop the nose and kill that wheel well gap.



      An old Jeep Cherokee radiator that was kicking around, almost looks as at home as the engine!


    15. #35
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      SW KS
      Posts
      162
      Country Flag: United States
      Look at all that room on passenger side for a big single 76mm.

    16. #36
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by cbpldc View Post
      Look at all that room on passenger side for a big single 76mm.
      .........I hate you for this.



      I have been trying to think of every way possible to rout the exhaust but there just isn't any room on the driver's side. I had even been thinking about going out the side of the fender and down to side pipes. This would have certainly reminded me that this build is supposed to be a joke. Aside from blasting the exhaust out the side of the car, there was clearly only one option....

      Modified factory truck manifolds to breath through a tiny diesel whirly muffler.




      Able to keep it under the hood


      Now that I have found a solution to keep the exhaust entirely hidden I think it only makes sense to do something with the intake manifold. I guess it is going to be a full blown sleeper.

    17. #37
      Join Date
      Apr 2015
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      165
      Country Flag: United States
      ...seriously!?

      Watching your builds is like watching a far more talented version of myself that does not have to answer to a wife...

      I love this.
      CAM-T Autocross Fox Mustang
      LX mustang autocross on the "cheap"...
      1953 PickEmUp
      1953 Chev Pickemup

    18. #38
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Posts
      126
      Country Flag: United States
      Nice work
      Anthony
      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/674663
      '71 Datsun 510, 2jz-gte (Supra TT) engine
      http://instagram.com/supra510


    19. #39
      Join Date
      Sep 2015
      Location
      SW KS
      Posts
      162
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by CadillacMazerolle View Post
      .........I hate you for this.


      Ahahaha!!!

      This is fantastic!

      Chris

    20. #40
      Join Date
      May 2014
      Location
      Londonderry
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by LERM View Post
      ...seriously!?



      Watching your builds is like watching a far more talented version of myself that does not have to answer to a wife...

      I love this.
      Quote Originally Posted by Supra510 View Post
      Nice work
      LOL. Thanks fellas. good to know someone out there appreciates my junk.
      Quote Originally Posted by cbpldc View Post
      Ahahaha!!!

      This is fantastic!

      Chris
      You and I are going to go round for round if you keep it up with your manipulative posts.


      If you neglect the cost of the Camry it's self because i paid WAY TOO much for it, being a rare turbo diesel.... I have about $2,500 into this build so far. That includes the cost of the axle, new tires, coil overs, engine, trans, clutch, turbo, metal, hardware, and paint. Hoping to be under $3,500 invested by the time it is Dyno tuned and shredding tire!


    Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com