Results 1 to 20 of 24
Hybrid View
-
05-12-2013 #1
I'm a little confused,,,, a Chevelle (or at least it's name sake) was a mid size car not a economy size car... Use a name sake effectively,, not like the 80's Chrysler/Shelby relationship with the Shelby Daytona's... A name won't carry you the product has to match the imagery/memory of the nameplate....
A quick question and food for thought frankly,,,,, why hasn't GM considered using an existing platform and grafting on a body that carries the styling of an original 60's or early 70's Chevelle??? They did it with the current Camaro and it appears to be a fairly success in sales,,, and Dodge did it with the Challenger..
Instead of rehashing a name sake, rehash the the glory days of GM and make us all want to buy American again... You guys have come a long way and unless governmental restrictions prevent it,,, why wouldn't you take the path of least resistance??? If you made a car similarly styled to either 60's or early 70"s Chevelle body styles and really carried the imagery as close as possible given current safety requirements,,, I'd have to think it'd be a great success.... Hell Porsche has been holding the line on general styling for years and they just keep selling the Hell out of there product year after year... You want feed back,, you got it now stop trying to reinvent and start recreating your past success...
As a side note,,, it's great to see you considering rear wheel drive again as front wheel drive almost cost you the corporation and notable lost market share in almost every sector of your line up....Last edited by tazzz25906112; 05-12-2013 at 07:59 AM.
Carbon Kustoms Limited
A.K.A. Albert from Toronto
-





Reply With Quote



