Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 23

    Thread: Opinions wanted

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States

      Opinions wanted

      Does the rear end of my car look low enough? I have DSE 3" drop springs in it and I am still not happy with how it sits. I can't go much lower or I will have issues with clearance when going over bumps. I have put about 75 miles on the car hoping they will settle some, but so far they have not. I am going to raise the coil overs on the front a little.

      Jeff


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Posts
      306
      looks good to me

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      The back would look better about an inch lower, but if it negatively effects driving the car I wouldn't mess with it. If you raised the front a half inch it would most likely look more "right" to you.

      The the gap between the tire and the body gets to big (compared to the front) it starts to look "jacked up".. if the front gap gets bigger than the rear then it gets the "cowboy rake" or "gasser" look. It's really hard to nail the stance.

      In a perfect world the front and back would both just be at the wheel lip and the car would a subtle nose down rake.

      Wow, that was an overly complex answer to your question.. BTW, you car is bad ass

      Don't forget to send me pictures.. good ones :D
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
      Don't forget to send me pictures.. good ones :D
      My camera is 5 megapixel, is that enough?

      Thanks for the input guys. The most important thing is functionality. I will be abusing uh, exercising this thing at track days pretty regularly, so I need to be free of rubbing and other interference issues. I know I have to have the tailpipes redone as it is.

      I think I will bust apart the front end tomorrow and jack the front up a little and see how it looks. GD DSE coil over setup, gotta bust the ball joints to adjust ride height.
      Jeff

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Tomball, TX
      Posts
      438
      Country Flag: United States
      I think your car looks bad a**. I can see what you're saying about the gap between the tire and fender in the back, but I think it's one of those things that most people wouldn't really notice or pay attention to it unless you brought it up. If I had've seen the car w/o hearing your thoughts first, I probably would've just said "wow that is an extremely sweet '67." I wouldn't compromise the performance/driveability of the car for something mostly cosmetic, especially if it's gonna see track time. BTW, what wheels tires are you running (size-wise I mean)?
      Ryan
      '68 Camaro (slowly coming back together...very slowly)

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      1,622
      Raise the front an inch and you'll be good to go!

      BTW that thing is BADA$$!
      '66 Chevy II - The "NEW" '69 Camaro!

      ***Under Construction***

      Build Update Link:

      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=17108

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States
      Deep Blue,

      They are 18x8 front with 245/45 ZR18 Toyo RA1 and 18x11 with 305/35 ZR18 Toyos on the rear. I went with the 305/35 because I knew I would need more sidewall height and I wanted to avoid potential clearance problems I might encounter if I jammed 345s in there.
      Jeff

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
      Posts
      1,364
      Country Flag: Canada
      That car is hot.

      -Matt
      Matt
      72 Chevelle 370ci, 76mm single turbo, TKX, Speedtech Track Time, Millerbuilt Strange full floater 9", Brembo brakes, BC Forged 18x11s with 315s square
      Instagram: Cst_koon

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Location
      Coolidge, GA
      Posts
      988
      My 3" DSE springs sat my car lower in the rear than that. Curious now as to why??


    10. #10
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      Looks fine. I wouldn't raise the front. Try looking at it with you or a similar amount of weight in the car. Remember that raising the front may negatively impact your handling. There is another sacrifice in the name of stance.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    11. #11
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by boilermaker
      My 3" DSE springs sat my car lower in the rear than that. Curious now as to why??

      The only thing I can think of is that my car does not have the stock interior, just lightweight seats and carpet. Also, I think 69s look lower because the top of the fenderwell is flat. Killer car, by the way. Anything hit, rub or bottom out with that ride height?

      I raised the front 1/2 inch today. I am going to leave it like this for driveability.
      Jeff

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Boulder, Colorado
      Posts
      192
      Damn that thing looks good. Hope my younger relative looks that good soon! Can we get a few more shots for inspiration? I for one could use some right about now.......
      Eric

      69 Camaro - LT1 w/ 700R4, DSE springs, swaybar and Konis. Still rockin' it old school with 15" wheels and 60 series tires.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      1,622
      VanB,

      I like it the way you did it with the 1/2" rise in the front! Now it looks just right to me!

      John
      '66 Chevy II - The "NEW" '69 Camaro!

      ***Under Construction***

      Build Update Link:

      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=17108

    14. #14
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Boulder69
      Damn that thing looks good. Hope my younger relative looks that good soon! Can we get a few more shots for inspiration? I for one could use some right about now.......
      Here is a little inspiration. Also my attempt at photography.

      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=23760
      Jeff

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Boulder, Colorado
      Posts
      192
      Diggin' it. Is the artsy one for Rupp and PHR? I'm going charcoal or black centers for sure now.

      How does the ignition work? Is that a distributor?
      Eric

      69 Camaro - LT1 w/ 700R4, DSE springs, swaybar and Konis. Still rockin' it old school with 15" wheels and 60 series tires.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Coronado, CA
      Posts
      1,688
      Country Flag: United States
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/at...7&d=1164850787
      That is one for the magazines if you put a little light to the grille and point a flash light on the wheel. Nice shot.
      Johnny C.
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      70 'cuda, Pro-Charged 408 stroker, Tremec 5 speed, Strange S-60, Alter-k-tion, Tri 4, Hydroboost and Wilwoods

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Sacramento Ca
      Posts
      6,827
      Country Flag: United States
      here it is lowered 1 to 1.5 inches in back.

      Tony Langlois
      1966 Corvair Monza

    18. #18
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States
      I love the look of your photoshop images, but the reality is that with my big 230 lb a$$ in the seat and a passenger the axle tubes would be on the bumpstops and the fender lips would be shredding the tires. It is a tossup whether that would happen first, or the headers would be flattened from the first driveway entrance or speed bump.
      Jeff

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      San Antonio, Tx
      Posts
      1,193
      it cost $14 to get two 1" lowering blocks from speedway motors and put them in and see how you like it. i put 250lbs in the trunk of my car with DSE 2" lowering springs and it wasn't low enough but i had to get the 1" blocks to fit the rear brakes so the parking brake cable wouldn't hit the springs. it looked like the picture TonyL made up for you.
      Instagram: CamaroAJ

    20. #20
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States
      I thought I posted it here, but it must have been at Lateral G. I have a pair of blocks that are a little over 3/4" and it looked just like the photochop that Tony put up, but there was very little clearance to the bumpstops. I chose to go with function over ultimate looks.
      Jeff

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com