Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14

    Thread: Lsx 5.3

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Posts
      115

      Lsx 5.3

      I was looking to use an iron block (carbed) 5.3 in my long overdue chevelle project. Whats should be replaced or "Freshened up" before I run this engine? Its a stock 5.3 with about 50k miles. I was thinking reseal with a fresh set of gaskets and re-ring the piston rings. Any thoughts or suggestions?



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Location
      jacksonville,fl
      Posts
      972
      Country Flag: United States
      50k, I,d leave it alone. The gaskets on these engine are a big part of their improvement over gen 1 engines & unless it never had oil changes , no need for reringing or anything at that mileage. Spend your money on installation & enjoy.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Location
      Birmingham, AL
      Posts
      3,355
      Country Flag: United States
      Agreed. The LSX engines I have seen don't have much wear at moderate mileage.
      Stephen

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Posts
      115
      Sweet! damn I love these engines

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,028
      Country Flag: United States
      Yeah, run it!

      What year 5.3? If you are going to beat it hard you may want to eliminate the DOD/AFM lifters (if you have them) as they are ridiculously big and heavy. If you are doing a cam swap I would definitely get rid of them.
      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Posts
      115
      Quote Originally Posted by dontlifttoshift View Post
      Yeah, run it!

      What year 5.3? If you are going to beat it hard you may want to eliminate the DOD/AFM lifters (if you have them) as they are ridiculously big and heavy. If you are doing a cam swap I would definitely get rid of them.

      Its pre-DOD/AFM 5.3. Maybe I will run a different cam/valvetrain.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      409
      Country Flag: United States
      Why carbed. Your going to need an electric fuel pump anyways. Dont be a dinosaur!
      Aldin
      1969 Camaro (Weapon of Choice) in the works

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Posts
      115
      Itll be carbed for now, just to get it going, I do have plans to go FI. I honestly just wanna get it running.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Location
      Holly Springs, GA
      Posts
      53
      I'm with the others- leave it alone. Had a friend who picked up an LS with 130k on it and low oil pressure. The previous owner thought it had thrown a bearing, but my friend knew better (he's a GM tech). As he predicted, it just needed a new oil pump, but he popped the pan and heads to check it out anyway. The cylinder walls still had the crosshatch- if it was an old style motor, the thing probably would have been bored and hones twice already....lol

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      bowling green,ky
      Posts
      845
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm running a carbd 5.3 in my 69 camaro. Has milled 243 z06 heads and a custom grind comp cam. Runs very good.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      St Louis
      Posts
      453
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm running a 50k 05 5.3 in my 72 Olds I use as a DD. Leave it alone. Keep the fuel injection especially if you got the harness with it. It will probably cost more to get the carb running on it vs keeping EFI.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      302
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by garys 68 View Post
      I'm running a 50k 05 5.3 in my 72 Olds I use as a DD. Leave it alone. Keep the fuel injection especially if you got the harness with it. It will probably cost more to get the carb running on it vs keeping EFI.
      I agree if you got the whole motor and the intake manifold carb will probably cost you more. Changing intakes and getting the ignition controller. Just get an aftermarket fuel tank and covette fuel filter/regulator. BTW i was getting 26mpg hwy with an 05 5.3l L33. It was making 275rwhp/329rwtq at the time.
      http://www.youtube.com/user/cutlassrkt?feature=mhee
      69 cutlass - 5.3l L33, Jakes stage 3 4L80e, 275/40/17 proxes tq

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Idaho Falls, Id
      Posts
      1,342
      My truck's 5.3 has almost 200k on it, and my 01 TA has about 170k. Both run great. What use to be considered high mileage is nothing to these engines. I did have to reseal the rear cover on the LS1 that went into my 89. It only had 55k. If there are no signs of leaks I would leave it alone. If it looks like the rear main or rear cover are leaking, better to reseal those while it's out than have to pull your trans later
      Traven

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Posts
      115
      Quote Originally Posted by T_Raven View Post
      My truck's 5.3 has almost 200k on it, and my 01 TA has about 170k. Both run great. What use to be considered high mileage is nothing to these engines. I did have to reseal the rear cover on the LS1 that went into my 89. It only had 55k. If there are no signs of leaks I would leave it alone. If it looks like the rear main or rear cover are leaking, better to reseal those while it's out than have to pull your trans later
      Cool. Thnx for the replies...




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com