Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 13 of 13
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2012
      Posts
      4
      Country Flag: United States

      Body Mount Bushings-Poly or Solid?

      Hey guys I am a young car builder and new to this site. I recently started working on my 68' Camaro project car. I am really trying to build my Camaro with the Pro-Touring style and ability in mind. I am looking into what body mount bushings are best for a Camaro that will be used for Autocross racing and for extended driving as well! If anyone could give me their opinion on polyurethane vs solid aluminum bushings, it would be greatly appreciated!



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Location
      Golden, CO
      Posts
      85
      I put solids in my 1968 F-body 20 years ago and it made an improvement in handling with no real downside. Go solid bushing like Global West or the other type of interlocking rather than the cheaper Comp Engineering bushing that is just a spacer. The interlocking type maintain the body relative to frame better. Poly vs solid is a long time controversy, but less so in the subframe bushings. The subframe should not move at all. Make it like a full frame car. All the stuff about making the ride harsh, Hooey! Low profile tires, stiff springs and shocks - that makes a ride harsh.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2012
      Posts
      4
      Country Flag: United States
      Thats great advice! I have a package of Energy Suspension Polyurethane Body Mount Bushings right now, that I will most likely use. I am just really curious about how different the aluminum body mounts would be from them? have you heard of anyone liking/disliking using Energy Suspension products?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      beaverton oregon
      Posts
      392
      Country Flag: United States
      none! bolt it right to the floor. just loosen the lower steering column mount and tighten back up once it is tight to floor. make sure it is square. helps incorporate alot more of the floor pan as support rather than just 4 little contact circles.
      Scott R. (vinny)

      misha widebody SL55 highly modded
      -67 camaro ttls/viper t56, 350z irs, full frame, in the works
      -porsche cayenne turbo 175hp added over stock
      -other crap that just hauls me around!

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      San Diego
      Posts
      128
      Poly bushings will start to make noise if you don't treat them every now and then, older cars have a lot of body flex under hard cornering and solid ones will help with that. I would get solid ones if I were you, you'll want some later.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Milwaukee, WI USA
      Posts
      440
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by formula350 View Post
      Poly bushings will start to make noise if you don't treat them every now and then....
      I completely disagree with that statement. There should be no movement at all at the body mount bushings, therefore they cannot make any noise...
      poly bushings at points that move(like control arms, sway bars, etc) are a different story.

      I would highly recommend solid aluminum bushings. I've had both poly and solids on the same car, but never felt any difference between them.
      As said previously, they do not cause a harsh ride.
      The main reason I went with solid bushings was that I welded in subframes connectors, so the bushings would no longer be excessible.
      1969 Camaro SS, 350(NOM), M21, 12 Bolt Posi, 01B (Jan 69) LOS Build

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      East, Tennessee
      Posts
      574
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by First Bird View Post
      the other type of interlocking rather than the cheaper Comp Engineering bushing that is just a spacer. The interlocking type maintain the body relative to frame better.
      Is there a link to these Interlocking bushings? Can they be used on a full frame car like a 1986-87 Buick Regal? If anyone knows a place that sells this type can you please post up the links?

      Thank You in advance!
      1986 Buick T-Type

      RideTech, DSE, BAER Brakes, Forgeline Wheels, LED lighting, More!

      * Get your Top of the line GPS Theft recovery devices Here!
      www.GNSperformance.com

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      savannah,ga
      Posts
      862
      Country Flag: United States
      SPEED TECH, DETROIT SPEED, GULDSTRAND, they all have solid bushings. You can have them fabbed at a machine shop, too. Dont forget about AFCO RACING as well.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      San Diego
      Posts
      128

      p

      look up Torsional rigidity in suspension. I'm pretty sure their is a sticky on it. their is a "flex" not a movement. That's why they made the solid ones to have a stronger bond to the floor pans to eliminate the flex. Same with subframe connectors. I had poly ones on my car old camaro with no other upgrades at the time and they made noise. Just my experiance with them

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Milwaukee, WI USA
      Posts
      440
      Country Flag: United States
      Global West has the interlocking solid bushings http://www.globalwest.net/
      and they come with ALL new hardware; bolts, washers, etc. Those are the ones that I bought.
      1969 Camaro SS, 350(NOM), M21, 12 Bolt Posi, 01B (Jan 69) LOS Build

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,316
      Country Flag: United States
      imo solid ones like from global west or DSE AND subframe connectors are a must on any f-body. Poly ones offer some albeit not much flex, which you install SFCs to guard against, so I dont see poly & SFCs being a good match.

      i'd only use half height or none if i was building an all out car. not worth the hassels of sheet metal clearances, etc. in a car primarily built for the street

      my car has solid bushings and SFCs. Rubber trans & motor mounts. no NVH issues at all
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Fredericksburg, VA.
      Posts
      3,164
      Country Flag: United States
      IMO, I think the biggest determining factor in deciding which body mount to use is what sfc you plan to use. A bolt in sfc can work with a poly mount, a weld in sfc is more rigid and would be better with a solid mount.
      Steve Hayes
      "Dust Off"
      68 Camaro

      Support the RPM Act
      https://www.sema.org/rpm-faq.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Morristown, NJ
      Posts
      154
      Go with solid mounts and subframe connectors. I had solid and poly mounts and solids are better with less flex.
      1973 Camaro Type LT/RS
      http://www.apiem.com/camaro




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com