Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 7 of 7
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States

      Ford Ranger 4x4?

      I don't want to join a Ranger forum just to ask simple questions so I thought I'd start here. I'm thinking about getting an early 2000's model. Not 100% sure on the year but my price range dictates that range. Are there years I should stay away from? Does anyone have one and how do you like it? I'm wanting a 4wd model so I can go on some trails but nothing serious. I just want to not be that guy that thinks his 2wd truck can go anywhere a 4wd can. Auto or manual? Is the 5speed auto any good? Is lifting a 4wd model difficult or expensive? I'd only want a few inches and nothing hardcore just quality. Like I said, I'd just be taking it on trails really no rock crawling or anything like that. Mainly I want an open bed truck so I can haul my Duc around but also go on trails. How's the fuel economy on the V6 models?



      Thanks
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2010
      Location
      SLC
      Posts
      659
      I currently have an 89 and if I had to buy another one, I would probably get a 97 4.0 5 speed. its the last year they used the TTB front end. I think the majority of the population dislikes that suspension because of tire wear issues, but Ive had pretty good luck with it. Its cheap to lift, and you can get a reasonable amount of travel out of it (probably the most available travel out of any ifs, and on 33" mud tires I can go around 50k miles on a set of mud tires.) mileage is probably going to be 17-20, or 15-17 lifted. if you ger a 4x4 super cab, I doubt you will get much better mileage with the smaller engines. The body styling is a bit bland, but that year would be a cheap reliable very off road capable truck.
      Zach

      1970 Mach 1 build - Half-Breed (pro-touring.com)

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2011
      Location
      Clearwater/FL
      Posts
      512
      Country Flag: United States
      I would be lookin for a 4.0 5 speed, ford automatics suck donkey ba--s unless its a c4 or c6....
      85 monte, drift project- small block t5 and 8.8
      88 Blazer sbc
      05 300c

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      Out of the Burbs of Detroit to SoCal, then onto my ancestral homeland, the woods of Cascadia
      Posts
      1,753
      Country Flag: United States
      Might want to stay away from early year 4.0 SOHC, timing chain issues. The OHV's are not a problem.

      I'm on my third 2wd. Live in Detroit, fly back to Cali every 3-4 years and get a 10-12 YO Explorer. Spend $2500-3500, drive it a couple years, part it out.

      What model Duc? I have an old Cagiva Ala Azurra (built during the two weeks or so in '86 when the Castiglioni's felt it would be good to market a Pantah under the Family name. CA = Castiglioni, GI = Giovani = Dad, VA = Varese, the city of assembly)
      Greg Fast
      (yes, the last name is spelled correctly)

      1970 Camaro RS Clone
      1984 el Camino
      1973 MGB vintage E/Prod race car
      (Soon to be an SCCA H/Prod limited prep)

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks guys. I honestly can't believe I'm even looking at a Ford. I've always been GM. However, the Ranger is a better truck than the S10/Sonoma, and the 98+ extended cabs have four doors which is huge to me. I'm also highly considering the manual trans which GM again doesn't have compared to the number of Rangers with the manual. So it's looking like that's the truck for me. I just have to decide what I want and how much to spend. One thing that does help me feel better is they hold their value even though I'm finding the cost a little high still compared to a full size truck. I just don't want to deal with a full size truck. I like the size of my Trailblazer which this truck would replace and I have no family to haul around.

      Greg, I have an 09 Monster 1100s. So far I love it. I just need to find more time to ride and better locations to ride. SW Kansas is flat!
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2010
      Posts
      497
      Country Flag: North Korea
      My work gives me work trucks/cars do to my job and right now i have a single cab ranger and my only advice is: pick another truck. This ranger is without a doubt the worst vehicle i've ever driven.

      The ride sucks, the power is nonexistant(4cyl), the seats are uncomfortable, and it just barely fits someone over 6ft.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      I'll be getting a V6 extended cab with the higher trim level ie way better than a work truck. How's the build quality?
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com