Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 25

    Thread: suspension help

    1. #1
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11

      suspension help

      Hi, i am looking for some suggestions on suspension systems for my 68 mustang. I have been looking at the AJE kit and the various MII kits. I was wondering if anyone would have any feed back on to which would be better. My 68 is my daily driver, so overall handling is important. The engine that i am building is a 427 stroker with a single 76mm turbo. If you plan to give me some feedback please list the reasons why you would choose a system.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      Check out TCI's Mustang/Cougar IFS kit. It is what I decided to use on my Falcon, not a driver yet so no impressions on the feel/handling, but it is a high quality option. Depending on how you run the manifold for the turbo it might be nice to have the extra room of removed shock towers to pipe it all up.
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      i have looked at theirs, why did you decide on that one compared to the other MII kits out there. also looked at rod&customs. Yes i will need the room, but the AJE kit allows you to trim the shock towers also.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      Because the TCI kit is not a mustang II kit, it is a scratch design that uses new geometry. They actually make a MSII kit for the Falcon, yet I went the road less traveled (ie never before traveled) and modified thier Mustang/Cougar IFS to fit my Falcon. Give Jason at TCI a call and tell him I sent you, he can explain the technical aspecs of the difference between the TCI IFS and a Mustnag II set-up. The R&C is a good kit but does not use corrected geometry and thus will still handle like a MSII, I am not dogging it, I just figured for the same investment I would go with upgraded specs and engineering.

      If you want to keep the towers Bryce (who I am sure will chime in shortly) put together a pretty sweet custom set-up on his Stang and Falcon. I would go this route before the AJE.
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    5. #5
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      I did not realize that. by the way nice build , just checked out your thread. I like the rims you were test fitting with. I am over the TT II's also. looking at running a mesh style. i also am in the process of fitting 18x13 in rims on the rear. I like the rear suspension by TCI, but already have rod&customs 4 link on the rear. Have you decided on brakes yet? I went with wilwood 6 pistons up front and a dual res brake master cyl.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      Also went with the 6 piston Wilwoods up front, undecided on what to bolt to the rear (in my avatar). I am in the process of placing the order for my wheels. The ones in the pictures were from my Subaru for mock-up. They looked good but not exactly the look I was going for. Originally I wanted to run a 335 tire out back but it requires too much cutting on the humble Falcon, so I toned it down to 315's on 18x11's.
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      yes, the 335's do require some cutting. for moc up i have a set of used 345 mt drag radials. have already notched the rear frame rails, next a new plate to locate my lower control arm 1 in inwards, then mimi tubs, i really need toget a spare car.. why not run the wilwoods on the rear, maybe a 4 piston caliper with the same size rotor as the front.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      335's on a falcon require new frame rails moved in about 2", thus why I decided against it. Mustangs, especially 68+ have more room to start with. The 335's should look great on your car, plus you will need all 335mm to hold the power from a 427 & turbo. Most likely I will get the 4 pistons on the rear, no rush to decide since the 8.8 I am using already has disks so upgrading can happen whenever.
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      I built my own HAHA! I did that because I wanted to limit the compromises.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by LowFast View Post
      If you want to keep the towers Bryce (who I am sure will chime in shortly) put together a pretty sweet custom set-up on his Stang and Falcon. I would go this route before the AJE.
      Told Ya!
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    11. #11
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      you should check out this months modified mustang and ford magazine. they have a TCI suspension going into a falcon. the only thing i dont like about there suspension is that it uses chrysler ball joints. but o well

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      I designed my suspension around a screw chrysler ball joint? Popular style in circle track racing. What dont you like about that ball joint?

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      Roanoke (FortWorth) Texas
      Posts
      786
      My Total Control Products front suspension also uses the Chrysler ball joint.
      Chris

      Total Cost Involved - Ridetech - Fatman - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - MaverickMan Carbon

    14. #14
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      did not mean to rub anyone the wrong way, but i work in the general automotive field and during my 6 years I have replaced more chrysler balljoints than any other make. all with less than 80,000 miles on them. I live in north florida where the roads a good. i have even had several total blowouts get towed into my shop. So longevity is important, because i drive my car everyday 50 miles 5 days a week. I am sure they will be fine withe the lighter weight of my car, but still a concern. my globalwest uppers use a chevy balljoint and after 110,000 miles and 8 years of use they are tight. i have also been told that they fail do to bad geometry and the joint is good. i am still going to order the kit or the new heidts kit, that also uses the same balljoint. has anyone seen there new frontend kit?

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      Just an FYI, the bolljoints on my ford truck barely made it 20k before they crapped out. Switched to Spicer (Now owned by Raybestos) and have had no issues since. I recomend to anyone replacing ball joints to go with Raybestos Professional Grade (formerly Spicer) if available for your application, the things are built like a tank.
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    16. #16
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      what year and type of ford truck

    17. #17
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      another issuse that ford has is the bearings . had an 09 f150 with 45,000 on the clock and the bearing failed and then welded its self to the spindle

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Texan Back in Texas!
      Posts
      676
      Country Flag: United States
      2003 F150 Supercrew
      1965 Falcon Hardtop

      However long you think your project will take, double it and you might be halfway right.

      Build Thread: https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...847#post798847

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      FWIW, The chrysler style ball joints I am using are manufactured by AFCO racing. I am not concerned about quality. My next front suspension build will be using spherical bearings instead of ball joints.

    20. #20
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Posts
      11
      those are nice trucks. sorry the joints failed, you should have gotten atleast 130,000 out of them. they usually fail becuase of the boot being torn and no grease fitting to add clean grease. just did the upper and lowers on my 02 explorer and the tranny at 133,000. still pissed about the tranny, why would you put a jag tranny in my truck 5r55w.

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com