Results 21 to 28 of 28
Thread: early ford handling
-
09-11-2011 #21
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 709
Mac struts blow, both on mountain bikes and cars. When the design came on a super-cheap Volkswagen Beetle update, it's not a real compliment to a performance application that was not originally insulted with the design. It's a packaging design to make things cheaper, with fewer parts, rather than a performance upgrade. As for TCP, under the heaps of compliments on their pretty blue paint, there are some realities behind the true application of their parts under real stresses. There are more than a few reasons why track guys still go with gusseted stock-style control arms... That said, many people are happy parking their TCP components at cruise-ins.
-
09-11-2011 #22
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 709
I'm in agreement on the Mac strut idea--they're just cheap and pointless, although RRS's stuff is quite attractive. As for the coilover, I believe some of the TCP designs land the lower coilover mount on the upper control arm, hence the roller spring perch thought (although the perch is obviously done away with). When combining this with the relocated mounting point at the tower (instead of drilling/relocating), you essentially have a really expensive solution to not wanting to deal with UCA shims and a drill.
Drill = 25 bucks
Shims = 2.5 bucks
TCP stuff = way freakin' more
You may want to throw in another 20 for the angle grinder to cut some standard coil springs...
Experience of being a cheapskate, bleeding your knuckles, and getting dirty on 1960s tech that still works = priceless.
-
09-11-2011 #23
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 709
04-04-2012 #24
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 717
bump
dont think i'll be going with the DSE mustang front setup as it sounds like it'll replace my new fancy roadrace belly bar made by toporanger from the maverick.to forum
how does the globalwest setup compare to the tcp? is it better the negative control version vs the tcp coilover72 buick skylark
twin-turbo fuel injected buick 350..perhaps stroked to 370 in the works!
04-05-2012 #25Another option you might take a look at is the new Tru-Turn setup from ridetech. They now have a Mustang setup that looks pretty good if you are wanting to keep your shock towers. Its hard comparing one company to another without seeing some hard numbers. TCP is more of a direct replacement in tubular form with better components and adjustability. Reading over ridetech and Globalwest info, it appears they have actually engineered the components to provided the desired suspension geometry.
ChrisTotal Cost Involved - Ridetech - Fatman - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - MaverickMan Carbon
04-05-2012 #26



Reply With Quote
