Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      McKinney, TX
      Posts
      899
      Country Flag: United States

      Engine/Trans angle?

      I have been trying to find an answer on this, but there isn't really a whole lot of info (that I have found) on lining up the driveline at the correct angle. I have found tons of info on Pinion Angle, but not so much on Trans/Engine angle...

      Here is the best summary I have read about Pinion Angle:
      Ladder-Bar Suspension 1/2 degree of pinion angle
      4-link 1-2.5 degrees of pinion angle
      leafs 6-7 degrees of pinion angle


      So, that brings me back to the transmission. If I am fabbing my own transmount, What angle do I want the engine/Trans to aim?
      The pic below is an exaggerated image to help illustrate my point. It is entirely possible that it is not important, so long as the pinion angle is set according to the specs above...but I would like to know what the suspension pros have to say about it before I go fabbing up my crossmember!


      And if there is some importance to setting the angle, where do I take the measurement from?
      Thanks!

      Confucius says, "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life"

      My build Beast


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Pensacola, FL
      Posts
      1,265
      Country Flag: United States
      I have been thru this many times in the last year. I still have not grasped it totally. The consensus seems to be- if the driveline is down X degrees, the pinion should be up X degrees. Basically if you were to draw a line thru the pinion angle & the driveline agle, they should be parallel. There should be some angle (either + or -) or the U joint will have a slight bind. Most research I have done suggests 2.5-3 degrees down on the trans is about as much angle that you should have. Lastly, the driveshaft should not slope upward from the trans to the rear end. I am no expert, as I am still working on my setup. Seems everyone has a different view on the subject. I'm sure other with more experience than I will chime in. Scott

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2010
      Location
      Corvallis Montana
      Posts
      597
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm at the same step in my build i need to make my trans mount for my 1969 camaro i have a l92 with a 6l80e and i cant find a mount anywhere so it looks like i will be fibbing it up so if anyone else can help with the angle of the rear tail shaft it would help out!!! good thread!

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,048
      Country Flag: United States
      The angles should be parallel as already stated, sometimes I setup pinion angle slightly down from parallel, it depends on the suspension.

      The 3 degree "standard" driveline angle comes from most carb intake being manufactured with 3 degrees built in. So with a 3 degree angle (tailshaft down) the carb ends up level. With fuel injection it's not as
      big a deal, put it where it fits best and adjust pinion to match...that's how I do it anyways, your mileage may vary...

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      McKinney, TX
      Posts
      899
      Country Flag: United States
      Been looking around online and found this pic that seems to illustrate the parrallel that has been mentioned:



      So, could I use an empty slip yoke in the tail of the trans and a magnetic angle finder to figure this out?
      Confucius says, "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life"

      My build Beast

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,048
      Country Flag: United States
      You don't even need the trans yoke. Square against the tailshaft would work, we have used the engine oil rail, too. They are parallel to the crank centerline. That picture is cool, worth a thousand words

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      state of confusion
      Posts
      1,499
      Country Flag: United States
      Just that perfectly in line is not a perfect situation. You need a tiny bit of angle at each joint so that the needle bearings in the cups will actually roll around a little.

      How much driveline angle is right for my application?

      Thats a loaded question. The best answer is....the least amount of driveline or u-joint angle is the best amount of angle. Try to achieve the least amount of u-joint angle but don't make it less than 1 degree. A little known fact about u-joints is that they require about 1 degree of operating angle to get the needle bearings rotating. If they do not rotate they will fail.
      http://www.dennysdriveshaft.com/freq...questions.html


      Norm
      '08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
      '19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
      Gone but not forgotten dep't:
      '01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States

      I found this a while back...

      Stole these pics off someone's site...don't remember where though.

      Name:  pinionangle1.jpg
Views: 2035
Size:  11.5 KBName:  pinionangle2.jpg
Views: 2298
Size:  24.1 KBName:  pinionangle3.jpg
Views: 2475
Size:  23.3 KB
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Dec 2011
      Posts
      5
      Country Flag: United States
      How about starting at the engine. Put a level on the intake where the carb bolts to and make sure it's level.. Use an angle finder on the oil pan rail, starter pad, or back of crankshaft. Once you bolt the transmission to the engine it should be the same angle. Fab a mount to hold this angle. Set the pinion angle up the same angle as the engine & transmission downward angle.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2009
      Location
      New Derry, PA
      Posts
      1,265
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by absintheisfun View Post


      The real key to all of this is that the yokes are parallel (or in line) UNDER LOAD. That is why you will see different pinion angles recommended for different suspensions. Each design allows a certain amount of "pinion climb", with leaf springs being the highest. Most OEM or "street" oil pans, trans pans, and carb intakes are designed to work at 2-3deg down angle to the rear. Do NOT set up a pinion (at rest) pointing UP to match this angle on anything other than a torque arm or truck arm suspension.

      Some of the pinion angles listed above come from the racing world, and assume the engine is mounted level in the chassis. Note that many racing oil pans and manifolds are parallel to crank centerline. If you are running EFI and a custom oil pan, I would recommend lowering the engine in the chassis as much as practical (until level), and setting up the pinion angle accordingly.

      Ray Kaufman - Wyotech Chassis Fab and High Performance Instructor. Words of Wisdom from an old master... at Asylum Custom Interiors website

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2012
      Posts
      11
      Country Flag: United States
      I can't comment on your settup, or why you want your tailshaft to sit at that angle. But all manufacuters from the factory have the driveshaft slightly angled to the passenger side, in other words the rearend is offset to the passenger side and the driveshaft sits at an angle sideways, not alot, but just alittle. They do this so the needle bearings in the u-joints will spin and cool the u-joint to keep the u-joints from failure because of heat. If the driveshaft is at an extreme angle, all types of problems will occur sooner or later. At an angle like that you're practically spinnig the u-joints like a hoola hoop.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      Location
      New Jersey
      Posts
      536
      Country Flag: United States
      Well, just be glad you aint me. I'm sorta stuck with the "best I can get" in my build. The 4 link and my floor leaves little room to put the pinion anywhere other then where its at. Luckily its all pretty close. I guess the point of my post is to set the car up at ride height and see where you are in the back while you figure out the front. There was a dramatic difference between "normal" stance and "full kill" stance that I was not expecting. (At least in my 1st gen). Like most of us, I drive around in full kill so that had to be accounted for. Had I set the motor up first, then tried to compensate with the 4 link I would have run out of real estate.
      RJ Cilurso
      67 Camaro with a few things bolted to it
      12 Camaro with a few things bolted to it
      50 Chevy 5 window p/u with a few things unbolted
      USAF




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com