Results 21 to 38 of 38
Thread: Varishock installation
Threaded View
-
09-06-2011 #30
Thanks and not taking it as wiseass, but there was a reason I didn't go with the coilover. Suspension travel. There is measurably less suspension travel with the coilovers than with the coil/shock combination. Not picking on the Varishocks in any way - and am not saying that there is anything wrong with them (the coilover bolt-in model) whatsoever. Just that when you look at effective shock travel I decided (after talking QUITE a while with Marcus) that since my spring rate was where I wanted it, my height was where I wanted it, and the only thing I wanted to change was damping and rebound, the bolt in double adjustable was optimal for my use. BTW, I'm saying this in reference ONLY to the "bolt in" Varishocks for the 1st Gen A-body compared to the traditional coil/double adjustable varishock, and NOT comparing coilovers in general. IF I were running an Alston, Schwartz or Roadster shop chassis rather than an actual A-Body frame, I'd have coilovers.
Hope this makes sense.
'66 GTO Vert Project "Red Ink", 462ci of stroked pontiac power, TKO600, SC&C Stg II+, Tubular lowers, Currectrac Rear suspension, Moser 12bolt w/Truetrack, Wilwood Master and discs all around, too much fun for words...
-






Reply With Quote



