Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 55
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      Mason TN
      Posts
      282

      One dead in Chevelle SS wreck...

      Very Sad for the occupants;
      http://blog.oregonlive.com/breakingn...tion_afte.html


      1986 Monte SS, 427 sbc, Victor E manifold, FAST TB, FAST XFI, T56 6spd, Moser M9 rear 3:70, SC&C G5, Spohn lowers, Pole Position Uppers, Alston Coil Overs, Pirelli all around


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      Hills of Anaheim
      Posts
      273
      Sad indeed.

      Wow! Car completely separated from frame.
      Matt - 1970 Chevelle

      www.street-demons.com

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      The story is over 3 years old, but it still sucks to look at those pics...
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by THE TECH View Post
      Wow! Car completely separated from frame.
      I have disassembled a few 69-71 Chevelles, and if it was the original bolts, yeah, that could easily happen.

      Still can't believe people don't wear seatbelts.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Atlanta, GA
      Posts
      296
      Very sad :( The story was posted up on chevelles.com

      http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=186950
      Lamar
      00 C5 hardtop H&C 436 rwhp with an 04 Z06 Suspension
      70 Chevelle SS396

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      295
      Country Flag: Canada
      Not to make light of a tragic event. But the pictures do prove that contrary to some beliefs newer cars maybe smaller and moer plastic; however they are a lot safer than old "solid steel" car we love.
      Andy Pooni

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      1,635
      I think the bolts failed, or the body mounts ripped out from frame or body.
      I have seen many, many bad wrecks, this is the first I see where the frame separates.
      Once the frame separates from the body, the structures lose most of their rigidity.
      Dave
      84 Monte SS - just a few bolt-ons

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by mc84_zz4 View Post
      I think the bolts failed, or the body mounts ripped out from frame or body.
      I have seen many, many bad wrecks, this is the first I see where the frame separates.
      Once the frame separates from the body, the structures lose most of their rigidity.
      I would bet that had more to do with the aftermarket rigid rear control arms and the direct-hit that it took to the axle than any hardware failure. A stock rear suspension would have folded up and absorbed some of that impact instead of transferring it all to the frame.
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Central FL
      Posts
      1,231
      Oh my God. That's awful. A roll cage just went way up on my to do list.
      Dan
      1968 Camaro v2
      LS6 :: Viper T56 :: C5 Brakes :: Hotchkis Suspension


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Atlanta, GA
      Posts
      296
      Quote Originally Posted by Vicinity View Post
      Oh my God. That's awful. A roll cage just went way up on my to do list.
      Be careful with padding and spacing on the rollbar, so that you don't hit your head in a accident.
      Lamar
      00 C5 hardtop H&C 436 rwhp with an 04 Z06 Suspension
      70 Chevelle SS396

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Posts
      17
      My guess would be a holeshot/burnout that the driver lost control. Story indicated fishtailing and the road appeared dry.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Coronado, CA
      Posts
      1,688
      Country Flag: United States
      No seatbelts? C'mon! I hate wearing seatbelts too but it's something you have to do.
      Johnny C.
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      70 'cuda, Pro-Charged 408 stroker, Tremec 5 speed, Strange S-60, Alter-k-tion, Tri 4, Hydroboost and Wilwoods

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      Where the hosers are.
      Posts
      201
      It's been a long while since I read the details on the story, but I believe it was the body mount bolts failed or were missing, which caused the body to separate from the frame, in that incident.
      1973 Datsun 240 Z
      2.8L Turbocharged and Injected, WIP.

      DIY Fuel injection forums and information

    14. #14
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Posts
      379
      What I think about, when I read a story, like this; is the huge amount of power these cars have.

      It is necessary to treat them, and drive them, with a huge amount of respect for that power. It's too easy to get all squirrelly without trying too hard. A small amount of contamination on the road surface, a large crown in the road, coming out of a turn too fast, etc. can get you sideways in a hurrey.

      Especially when you have passengers, or are in traffic.

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Six_Shooter View Post
      It's been a long while since I read the details on the story, but I believe it was the body mount bolts failed or were missing, which caused the body to separate from the frame, in that incident.
      I remember a lot of speculation about that, but in the pics, the mounts that people were referring to never had any hardware from the factory. There were 4 body "mounts" on a '69 Chevelle that never had a bolt in them. They were the 2 in the center of the side frame rail (right below the middle of the doors) and the 2 above the rear axle. There were only 6 mounts (8 counting the core-support) that ever had any hardware in them.
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    16. #16
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Derek69SS View Post
      I remember a lot of speculation about that, but in the pics, the mounts that people were referring to never had any hardware from the factory. There were 4 body "mounts" on a '69 Chevelle that never had a bolt in them. They were the 2 in the center of the side frame rail (right below the middle of the doors) and the 2 above the rear axle. There were only 6 mounts (8 counting the core-support) that ever had any hardware in them.
      Correct, those additional provisions were for convertibles.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Sunny Florida on the Suncoast
      Posts
      1,060
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Derek69SS View Post
      I remember a lot of speculation about that, but in the pics, the mounts that people were referring to never had any hardware from the factory. There were 4 body "mounts" on a '69 Chevelle that never had a bolt in them. They were the 2 in the center of the side frame rail (right below the middle of the doors) and the 2 above the rear axle. There were only 6 mounts (8 counting the core-support) that ever had any hardware in them.
      All the Chevelles I have owned have eight bolted for just the body. One on each side of the firewall, one the middle of the doors, one each side right next to the front of the lower control arm mounts, and one on the left and right side just rear of the rear axle. Then there are the other four, two at the very rear of the body and the core support bolts. Convertibles have the two in front of the rear axle are bolted, where on the coupes it is just a cushion. I have never seen a body seperate on any Body on Frame cars unless the car was really rusted or the bolts were at fault, I believe that the body was not properly secured to the frame on that Chevelle SS. We have all seen poorly restored cars or just fluff and buff resale cars, so I would not be suprised to find that the bolts were loose, incorrect, or flat not there.
      Stay in it till you see God....then lift

      Where patience fails, force prevails

      "When you're born, you get a ticket to the freak show. When you're born in America, you get a front-row seat." G. Carlin

      Stapp's Ironical Paradox...... "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      You're correct, I forgot about the 2 right behind the axle... on mine, the one at the center of the door was just a cushion, like the one above the axle w/ no hardware in those 2 mounts.

      I think the big difference in this collision was the rear suspension being aftermarket tubular control arms, they did not buckle, so the impact to the wheel was transferred directly to the frame. After all, it's just a ~1" x 1" square nut on the top side of some 18-gauge mild steel, so it's not surprising they'd rip out of the body easily.
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Central FL
      Posts
      1,231
      Quote Originally Posted by Ripped View Post
      What I think about, when I read a story, like this; is the huge amount of power these cars have.

      It is necessary to treat them, and drive them, with a huge amount of respect for that power. It's too easy to get all squirrelly without trying too hard. A small amount of contamination on the road surface, a large crown in the road, coming out of a turn too fast, etc. can get you sideways in a hurrey.

      Especially when you have passengers, or are in traffic.
      I just learned this lesson yesterday. I came around a turn too hard and hit some oil and spun my car around. Luckily there was no one around, but it didn't seem like it was out of control until the last fraction of a second when I spun around.
      Dan
      1968 Camaro v2
      LS6 :: Viper T56 :: C5 Brakes :: Hotchkis Suspension


    20. #20
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Sarasota, Fl
      Posts
      1,717
      Probably the biggest message I get from an accident like this is that these old cars have crapall for safety and crash protection. Just f'ing terrible! I used to be super hardcore about not running a cage or roll bar in a street car, but when I see stuff like this, I start to wonder if the potential dangers of having one are offset by the potential safety and protection they might offer in such a crash. Which would be worse: making hard contact with a door bar or having the entire side of the car fold up like a burrito on you? I don't know...

    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com