Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 7 of 7
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314

      Rear suspension kinematics--parallel 4 link vs offset 3 link?

      Hey guys, I'm working on designing an offset 3 link for a friend, and I'm curious how much I can crib from basic parallel 4 link design ideology as I move forward. I've got a pretty good handle on IRS design but am still learning on solid axle stuff, so forgive me if this is silly.

      Also, any good books I should run through for more advice? I've got Milliken's Race Car Vehicle Dynamics on the way....



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      So. Cal.
      Posts
      1,240
      Country Flag: United States
      I dont even know. Ive thought about it some. Like why cant you just drop the forth link, beef up the third link and call it done.

      With a stout housing it should transmit the forces through the one link like it did with two upper links right? And you get the bennys of less bind. If it was a drag car I could see the weak side of the rear end ( the side thats missing the link) raising some (digging in) when it should be pushing up on the frame and keeping that side planted. So for a drag car maybe not the best. But for a twistys car where bind and control are common needs an offset third link shoud preform better.

      Handling or tire planting? Thats the Q. Most parallel 4-links are designed for planting the tires during launch. The handling aspect in the turns comes in second for consideration. And bring on the three link. I like it!! JR
      What I write is opinion, none of it is factual. 2010

      Even though I'm conscious it doesn't mean I'm coherent. 2011

      I'm getting better with age. Best thing about old age is I don't know any better. 2012

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      I've been thinking along the same lines. The car is a BIG MAMMA JAMMA so I'm gonna focus on maximizing handling as we're gonna need all the help we can get to get this thing around a road course. I'm trying to think of it in terms of heim-jointed links to make sure that I'm not relying on bushing bind to control the axle under loads (I won't be using heim joints on the finished product, though--just a thought experiment). I guess it's time to just dig into solidworks, build a 4 link, and then yank a link and see what the results are.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States


      Not working today huh? lol
      JC Scott


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      Side view calculations are the same. A/S and IC.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      2,413
      basicly how I worked out mine. copy popular 4 link side view and find a good spot for 3rd in plan view,.
      Nothing says "I built this" better than tool marks and dykem blue..

      Follow my 3 link build. https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=61592

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      LOWBUCK! YES! I'd forgotten all about your awesome work. That'll be a huge resource!

      And yes I'm working today--I'm just multitasking, haha.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com