Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 4 of 4
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2009
      Location
      Garland, Tx
      Posts
      533
      Country Flag: United States

      Chevelle upper rear control arm frame mount holes

      I've searched but haven't found my answer.

      While cleaning my frame before painting ('66 El Camino), I noticed that the upper control arm mounts have two sets of holes. Mine appears to have used the lower pair originally.

      What was the reason for the second set? Which set is better for handling purposes or does it make a difference?



      Thanks in advance.


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      St George Utah
      Posts
      1,243
      Country Flag: United States
      if there are 2 sets of holes the lower ones will be the better ones as far as the instant center goes. with GM who know why they are there.
      Blake Foster
      www.speedtechperformance.com
      435-628-4300
      St. George Utah.
      it's always sunny here.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2009
      Location
      Garland, Tx
      Posts
      533
      Country Flag: United States
      That's kinda what I thought, thanks for the reply.

      The distance between the holes center to center using my eyeball measuring tape is about an inch. I'm wondering since the car will be lowered at least that much, if the upper holes would be in a better spot for the factory intended geometry. Then again, it might help like you say to keep them in the bottom.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Actually makes it better lowered....you should adjust the lower control arm hole at the axle to level the arm.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com