Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 7 of 7
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      548

      Dry sump engine height drop

      Hello all, I looked at the instalation of dry sumped engines but didnt find any mention about what Im thinking. If you install a dry sumped LS7 or something like it, can the engine be dropped a lot more than a wet sumped engine? Are there special mounts to do this for say a second gen Camaro?

      Manuel Scettri
      ------------------------------------------------
      1973 Firebird - Pontiac 455
      1990 2 Door 4Runner - byebye
      1990 2 Door 4Runner - byebye
      2016 KIA Sportage diesel - The Daily Driver


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      2,670
      Country Flag: United States
      I might be out in left field, but I don't think the dry sump pan will give any more clearance to lower the engine. The sump part of a wet sump pan is either behind or in front of the crossmember. The shallowist part of the pan opposite the sump sits above the crossmember. I think a dry sump pan will need the same amount of clearance over the crossmember that a wet sump pan would need.
      Herb

      1966 El Camino LS408/T56Magnum
      1966 Chevelle 509/T56Magnum
      1963 C10 454/4L80

      PHR CHP CHP youtube


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      548
      Interesting. I thought of this but somehow thought the center section of the wet sump would be thicker due to the oil being in there as well as in the sump area, where the dry sump pan has all the oil in the tank.
      Manuel Scettri
      ------------------------------------------------
      1973 Firebird - Pontiac 455
      1990 2 Door 4Runner - byebye
      1990 2 Door 4Runner - byebye
      2016 KIA Sportage diesel - The Daily Driver

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Posts
      1,027
      no, generally the engine has to sit higher with a dry sump pan on ls engines. the pan ends up being thicker in the front then a wet sump. ls pans are very thin(3/4 of an inch) in the front 1/2.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      San Antonio, Tx
      Posts
      1,193
      also just because you could have more clearance with a dry sump pan doesn't mean you'll have more clearance with the bell housing.

      i could have lowered my engine another 3" to get it closer to the sub frame but then my bell housing would have been the lowest part of the car by a good 3" below the frame rails.
      Instagram: CamaroAJ

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Carlsbad, CA
      Posts
      744
      Country Flag: United States
      From first hand experience - I agree with everything posted. Drysump pan is taller at front than stock f-body pan. Plus depends a little on the sub-frame you are running. With my Art Morrison sub, the dry sump pan barely clears the steering rack. Not an issue but the point being, you won't get the engine to sit any lower with a different pan. Plus what was said above about the remaining drivetrain anyway. Hope that helps. (By the way, I made similar assumptions until I had it all together and could see the different components and clearances).

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      548
      Thanks guys! Great info to keep in the data bank!
      Manuel Scettri
      ------------------------------------------------
      1973 Firebird - Pontiac 455
      1990 2 Door 4Runner - byebye
      1990 2 Door 4Runner - byebye
      2016 KIA Sportage diesel - The Daily Driver




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com