Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    View Poll Results: New RSX Engine

    Voters
    97. You may not vote on this poll
    • Keep the Ford 302, I would buy it for $80K (PM your info..LOL)

      9 9.28%
    • Alum SBC 302 w/Turbo system (700+hp) Keep the strip even if it looks Ford’ish!

      30 30.93%
    • LS w/Turbo System (750+hp) Ditch the stripe!

      58 59.79%
    Results 1 to 20 of 85

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      Kansas City, MO
      Posts
      173
      Quote Originally Posted by Kenova View Post
      If you go looking for a new home for the Ford engine, take a look at the Maverick.
      If you are looking to build a smaller than usual LS engine, you could always stuff a 4.8 Crank in a 6.0 block with longer aftermarket rods. Just keep in mind that the crank would be the weak link, but with the shorter stroke it just might be stronger than most would give it credit for. This would give you in the neighborhood of 327 ci. That would be a small enough increase that your current turbo system could probably still keep up.

      Ken
      That's an awful lot of work to build a 5.3.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      2,314
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by SimplyKC View Post
      That's an awful lot of work to build a 5.3.
      I like to think of it as the better way to build a 5.3. The bigger bore improves breathing and the longer rods combined with the shorter stroke reduces the acceleration and deceleration forces the piston/rods see, along with a decrease in the side loads that are seen by the cylinder walls.

      Ken
      If there is a hard way to do something, I'll find it!
      My other car is a Vega.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Posts
      59
      I really like what you have now, super creative, original, and rips on the track.

      What about taking what you have and making it more badass, I think that would be the best bang for the buck.

      You could probably get that motor out of there, drop some poundage, change the internals around and add another 250hp, and easy to put it back in. I think it would be awesome to have that motor turn 8500 rpm and make 950+ hp.

      Coil over plug setup
      New heads
      Longer rods
      220 - 221, whatever it takes

      Oh yea, keep the sticker. Nothing better than some guy looking at you shaking his head and then you blow him away.
      Last edited by steinepstein; 06-28-2010 at 07:09 PM. Reason: grammar

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by Kenova View Post
      I like to think of it as the better way to build a 5.3. The bigger bore improves breathing and the longer rods combined with the shorter stroke reduces the acceleration and deceleration forces the piston/rods see, along with a decrease in the side loads that are seen by the cylinder walls.

      Ken
      I love "Big Bores" shorter stroke engines. They are so to run.

      I was entertaining a normally aspirated all Aluminum Big Block.. 4.500 x 3.760 (478ci) until the cash hit me...I would still dig it!
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      2,314
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by RSX302 View Post
      I love "Big Bores" shorter stroke engines. They are so to run.

      I was entertaining a normally aspirated all Aluminum Big Block.. 4.500 x 3.760 (478ci) until the cash hit me...I would still dig it!
      OH YEAH!! That would make you pitch a tent!

      Ken
      If there is a hard way to do something, I'll find it!
      My other car is a Vega.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com