Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732

      Caster, Camber, Scrub radius and tire width inter-relationship

      My setup,

      3 1/4 Caster

      1.8* Camber

      1/32" Toe out

      3 3/8" scrub

      275mm width tire ( both 17" and 18" rims same height )

      The above setup runs fine with R compound tires, 17 x 9.5

      When I bolt on my street rims / tires ( 18 x 10 ) the scrub increases to 3 3/4", and I get a vibration ( high frequency ) in the steering wheel above 70 mph. The vibration seems to change with pavement type / condition.

      My question is can more caster dampen this? How much would toe settings help? Would less camber change this? Is the softer tire less inclined to show the vibration or is the extra 3/8" scrub the culprit?

      I'm starting to think the new rims may have a problem with being concentric.

      Matt

      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Posts
      202
      Country Flag: United States
      More castor might help, but it sounds like there is another problem or a significant difference between the wheels or tires. Are both sets of wheels balanced the same way? 18's have more weight at the perimeter. Have you tried adjusting the toe for street tire use to zero or very slightly in? That might help too and it's very easy to go back and forth if you mark the tie rods.

      Good luck
      70 Mach I, dry sump & lots of mods
      70 1/2 Z28 project car

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      San Francisco, CA
      Posts
      808
      Country Flag: United States
      +1 I'd also like to know.

      I have this issue on my daily driver subaru. I've had my wheels balanced multiple times and multiple tire rotations (same size on all 4 corners), but I still get a steering wheel vibration at 65+ that seems to be based upon road surface and other random factors (temperature, uphill/downhill, straight aways no turning).

      My subaru runs 0.0 camber up front and +1.5 caster.
      Steven

      1968 Camaro: Project "TRACKDAY"

      Latest Track Weekend Video

      Build in Progress

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      I did try 0 and slight toe in with no noticeable difference.
      Both wheels are balanced the same way although the 18's are heavier. I jade them rebalanced and they were slightly off. I'm keeping my fingers crossed but doubt it will help.

      Quote Originally Posted by funcars View Post
      More castor might help, but it sounds like there is another problem or a significant difference between the wheels or tires. Are both sets of wheels balanced the same way? 18's have more weight at the perimeter. Have you tried adjusting the toe for street tire use to zero or very slightly in? That might help too and it's very easy to go back and forth if you mark the tie rods.

      Good luck
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Sunny Florida on the Suncoast
      Posts
      1,060
      Country Flag: United States
      Check the wheel bearings for play. The added weight of the 18's might just be enough to bring out the wheel bearings vibration.
      Stay in it till you see God....then lift

      Where patience fails, force prevails

      "When you're born, you get a ticket to the freak show. When you're born in America, you get a front-row seat." G. Carlin

      Stapp's Ironical Paradox...... "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      Quote Originally Posted by 406 Q-ship View Post
      Check the wheel bearings for play. The added weight of the 18's might just be enough to bring out the wheel bearings vibration.
      I did adjust them and there was no difference.
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Location
      crossville,tn
      Posts
      74
      After spending 20 plus years in racing, with more than my fair share of steering wheel holders, we need a definition of your vibration. Underload, the rear steer steering components are compressed, front steer components are being for a lack of a better term are stretched. Anything that increases or decreases that load can cause a kind of vibration as the load fluctuates. Positive Caster in all honesty wants to turn the wheels around, more castor the more load , the more load, the weaker links start to fail. Scrub, can increase the load and cause a load ,unload situation as the driver holds the wheel. Toe-in typically with good components causes a high frequency wobble, some drivers call a vibration, as the parts wear the car looses the vibration and starts to dance off of one wheel to the other or develops a wander. Increasing caster can mask this effect until the parts wear further and the vibration/wobble returns. Too throw another nut into the mix another source of vibration can also come from shock issues, that at the most violent feels like a tire out of round, or at the beginning of failure feels like a rumble in the steering wheel. Many times we baseline our cars, tune , and document, than establish duty cycles of each components based on our build sheets. I have been with teams that go with agressive front end settings, and you would be surprised which components started fail first and what the effects of those wore parts had for the driver.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      AZ
      Posts
      801
      Country Flag: United States
      You do have a lot of static camber and scrub, which should increse road noise, to a degree, but it doesn't sound like this is your issue to me; you are also a little small in the caster department, but if you haven't done the gulstrand mod, you're probably better off. What pre-load are you running on your front bearings?

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      Ok, I need to clarify some things. I'm running a Chassisworks front subframe with upper adjustable " G-arms ". I dont know exactly how much more caster I can add without binding the arms. These arms use a turn-buckle type adjustment.

      I drove the car 1600 miles with this annoying situation, and see no abnormal wear on the new tires. At around 70 - 75 mph the steering wheel gets a shake, rapid back and forth movement varying from about an 1" or less, depending on road surface. You can not feel this in the suspension or body. If I grip the wheel tight it disappears until I loosen my grip. Cornering does not seem to change it. Driving in the rain seems to dampen it. On one road with rain grooves running the direction of movement there was no shake at all. With my 17" rims it is non-existent.

      I have checked all the suspension and made sure everything was tight, and there was no wear. I tightened the front spindle nut one more cotter pin hole so now I have just the slightest bearing play when rocking the brake rotor.

      I'm wondering if the scrub difference combined with the large and heavy front wheel / tire assy, is just to much.

      Or the balancing machine at Discount Tires is just not accurate enough for what I'm asking of the front suspension.

      Both sets of rims were balanced at the same place, the 17" are corvette wheels with 54mm offset and use 1 3/4" spacers to fit my car. The budnik 18" x 10" have a 0 offset ( 5.5" back space ), they are using tape weights split in two rows, just behind the billet center and the inner edge.

      Thoughts?
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      Was the air pressures similar in the two setups? Wondering if the tire is bouncing like a basket ball and the shock isn't keeping that in check from one setup to the other.
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      Quote Originally Posted by John Wright View Post
      Was the air pressures similar in the two setups? Wondering if the tire is bouncing like a basket ball and the shock isn't keeping that in check from one setup to the other.
      Interesting, I doubt it was bouncing as I could stop the effect with some hand pressure. But I will try and let some air out and see what happens. The pressures were within 2 psi of each setup, but the tire construction is completely different.

      One note: I can let go of the wheel and the car tracks perfect at any speed. The only time I notice it is when I am resting my hand on the wheel. With any slight grip pressure I feel nothing in the wheel or the car. It really acts like there is a high speed oscillation being transmitted up the steering shaft. The steering setup is power, mustang 2 style, rack and pinion with two borgeson u-joints and an Ididit tilt column. The joint at the steering column end does have a vibration dampener.
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com