Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 34
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States

      Too Much Horse Power?

      Ok, so I am getting ready to buy my aluminum Small block. I have two options, 550 horse power or 650 horse power. I personally think that 650 h.p. is too much for my car and that I really dont need that much. I honestly think that I would be faster around a road course with 550 h.p.. Does this make sense to anybody else?


      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Walla Walla, WA
      Posts
      1,512
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Gitter Dun View Post
      Ok, so I am getting ready to buy my aluminum Small block. I have two options, 550 horse power or 650 horse power. I personally think that 650 h.p. is too much for my car and that I really dont need that much. I honestly think that I would be faster around a road course with 550 h.p.. Does this make sense to anybody else?
      Well, if you're going to start talking about real world practicality, I'm not sure what we'll do.

      FWIW, I agree with where you may be going, it takes an incredibly skilled driver to use all that power effectively - very few of us are that good, and probably most of us would do better learning how to drive a lower power car rather than struggling to manage a beast on the track. A good driver can make anything go fast.
      Mike Kelcy - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
      Well, if you're going to start talking about real world practicality, I'm not sure what we'll do.

      FWIW, I agree with where you may be going, it takes an incredibly skilled driver to use all that power effectively - very few of us are that good, and probably most of us would do better learning how to drive a lower power car rather than struggling to manage a beast on the track. A good driver can make anything go fast.
      I'm thinking you need a longer wheel base than 110" to effectively use that kind of power

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      I personally think the 500s are where it's at. I'm right at 500/500 at the crank, and it is both manageably civil and gobsmackingly quick.

      You can always add more later!

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by formula View Post
      I personally think the 500s are where it's at. I'm right at 500/500 at the crank, and it is both manageably civil and gobsmackingly quick.

      You can always add more later!
      I am currently running 400/400 to the rear wheels and am very comfortale with it and know I can handle more, how much hosepower at the crank would equate to 500 to the rear wheels?

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Posts
      352
      auto or stick? if auto what kind?

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 2ndgenhunter View Post
      auto or stick? if auto what kind?
      4 speed manual

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      Rule of thumb is to assume 15% drivetrain losses... Not perfect but it'll ballpark ya.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by formula View Post
      Rule of thumb is to assume 15% drivetrain losses... Not perfect but it'll ballpark ya.
      550 hp minus 15% gets me 467.5 to the rear wheels, and I have heard that each lb you lose is worth 1 hp, and the aluminum block will knock 100 lbs off the front end, hmmmm....., leaning towards 550 hp for now.

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      Quote Originally Posted by Gitter Dun View Post
      550 hp minus 15% gets me 467.5 to the rear wheels, and I have heard that each lb you lose is worth 1 hp, and the aluminum block will knock 100 lbs off the front end, hmmmm....., leaning towards 550 hp for now.
      Isn't it each ten pounds lost is approximately equal to a horsepower gained? Otherwise, every time you had a couple buddies in the car with you, your car would turn into a geo metro.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      Springfield, MO
      Posts
      4,470
      Country Flag: United States
      A 650 hp small block is powerful, but you gotta remmber tq. There prolly won't be tons down low, meaning that you will have to wind it to get there. Which would make it a bit "less" down low in normal driving than the smaller one IMO.
      Me? 650 without question if the price was doable. When you get a tq monster engine, that's when it gets crazy IMO.
      Jimmy

      69 Camaro Twin Turbo'd
      58 Nomad 348 Baby Rat

      http://www.fquick.com/shmoov69


    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      It's not easy to hook 650 hp. But torque is the more important number.

      I ran in the 550 range and only after my car was set to the point of being able to handle that power did I move (am moving) to the 650 range.

      A well set up car with 550 will consitently beat an un-setup car with 650.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      oshawa ontario
      Posts
      1,607
      Country Flag: Canada
      what alum engine combo's were you thinking about.....????
      Nascar 69 Chevelle project, 1999 Hutch Pagan Nascar chassis, 69 Chevelle body,700hp, Penske's, slicks, roadrace track day https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...le-Cup-project
      89 Iroc 406 Fitech 5 spd
      01 chevy 2500HD 4x4 8.1 Allison
      31 Scarab 2 x 454

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm at 465RWHP (approx 530@crank) and the same torque. It's plenty. The car is a lot faster than my driving ability.

      As Mike stated, it is a lot easier to learn to drive a well-mannered car than a high-strung thoroughbred.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      Location
      New Jersey
      Posts
      536
      Country Flag: United States
      This thread makes me laugh and I'm very pleased to see some thoughtful mature responses. Its so easy to say there is no such thing as "too much". That statement always make me chuckle. I'm guilty of building motors to make impressive numbers without a car to back it up. My primarily drag 05 Vette made a de-tuned 763 at the wheels and could get smacked by set up cars with much less power. That motor was just to say I "could".

      Road course is no different and I applaud some of the comments made. I've found that 450 rwhp has always been very fun in a lighter sports car and very managable. More than that and you need to be on your game, as if you aren't already on a track lol, and you really need the car to be ready for it.

      Also agree on the torque comments. I've been up against cars with more HP and torque, but when my torque was early and flat I would always walk big number cars. Depending on your track the motor may rarely see its big HP numbers.
      RJ Cilurso
      67 Camaro with a few things bolted to it
      12 Camaro with a few things bolted to it
      50 Chevy 5 window p/u with a few things unbolted
      USAF

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for your help guys, The price for the 550 hp and 650 hp motors is the same, but driveability on the road course is a huge concern to me. The tracks I will be running at are Infineon and Thunderhill. Although 650 hp would be nice at Thunderhill, I think it would be to much at infineon. Need to keep in mind that tires and weight are going to play a huge part in this equation. Target weight is 2800 lbs not counting my weight. I spoke to my engine builder this morning and after a few considerations I am thinking to go with 570 hp, minus 20% should put me at 456 hp to the rear wheels.

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      oshawa ontario
      Posts
      1,607
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by Gitter Dun View Post
      I'm thinking you need a longer wheel base than 110" to effectively use that kind of power
      just.....FWIW - a Sprint Cup car wieghs 3400lbs, has a 110" wb, puts out about 850hp through a 10" slick on a roadcourse.
      Nascar 69 Chevelle project, 1999 Hutch Pagan Nascar chassis, 69 Chevelle body,700hp, Penske's, slicks, roadrace track day https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...le-Cup-project
      89 Iroc 406 Fitech 5 spd
      01 chevy 2500HD 4x4 8.1 Allison
      31 Scarab 2 x 454

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Feb 2003
      Location
      St. Louis, Missouri
      Posts
      988
      Country Flag: United States
      Just because your car has 650hp doesn't mean you need to use it. If you've got the cash now, build it now. You'll end up getting better and better and will eventually gain the experience to manage it.

      Rick Butterfield

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by shortrack View Post
      just.....FWIW - a Sprint Cup car wieghs 3400lbs, has a 110" wb, puts out about 850hp through a 10" slick on a roadcourse.
      Hmmm.... thats true......

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Happyfunballs View Post
      Just because your car has 650hp doesn't mean you need to use it. If you've got the cash now, build it now. You'll end up getting better and better and will eventually gain the experience to manage it.
      Good point, although I would probably lose bottom end power and reliability, I do need to make this motor last

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com