Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 8 of 8
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2008
      Posts
      144

      Cable or fly-by-wire?

      Hey team - I'm looking for your opinions on a cable drive or fly-by-wire throttle body and why you think one is better than the other. My LS3 is being shipped without a throttle body, so I get to make the choice and I prefer to make an informed one! Thanks for your input.

      Jimi Day
      FM3 Performance Marketing, Inc.
      http://www.fm3marketing.com

      "The timid hang back. But those with courage will march on." - Walter P. Chrysler


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Posts
      952
      since it can be a safety thing and electronics are not to be fully trusted, i'd vote for a cable operated linkage.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      DBW. Throttle rate can be tuned, cruise control initiated, and a cleaner installation. I'm serioulsly considering upgrading the current PCM to use one.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Chicagoland
      Posts
      957
      Country Flag: United States
      Dbw
      Jeff Schwartz 815-770-0751
      SchwartzPerformance
      Where classic style meets modern performance.
      455 Commanche Circle
      Harvard IL 60033
      SchwartzPerformance.com | Facebook | Twitter


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Topeka KS
      Posts
      103
      Country Flag: United States
      DBW. never heard of a problem with GM vehicles, and cruise control is easy
      68 C-10 5.3L

      97 Chevy 12V cummins powered monster truck

      On the hunt for a chevelle project

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      46
      Never had an issue with the dbw on the LS7. If you just got in the car and drove, you'd never know the difference, IMO.

      I like the capabilities that the stock computers offer, as well. Unfortunately, with the newer computers, it's not possible to get cruise control without having a BCM, at least to my knowledge. With the older 'LS1' generation of computers that had a separate throttle control module, it was very simple to add. To me, the lack of cruise control is the only drawback to it.
      1969 Olds 442 convertible; 455 th400 sable/gold
      2006 Pontiac GTO: cammed LS2 T56 blue/blue
      1968 Chevy Camaro coupe: cammed LS7 T56 C5 subframe DSE 4 link, etc. rallye green/parchment

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      GM DBW may not have been problematic however adapting a system to a vehicle that was not designed to use it is questionable. I'd rather run cable just due to legal implications. Just not worth the trouble imo.

      vince
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      I like the cable setup. Simple and easy.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com