Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 29

    Thread: Rubbing Issues

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      australia
      Posts
      64

      Rubbing Issues

      Guys , i got my new rushforths on, 18x10 with 5.75 b/s.... i got big problems...the tires are sitting hard on the 'hump' just above the lip??? I have heaps of room on the inside where i coulda had a better b/s???????. The lip is trimmed up to miss the tire , but then above that it rubs hard on the hump up and in there...
      diff is moser 12 bolt /drum brakes. Pretty dissapointing...
      Gav



      Gav

      69 camaro rs/ss clone.


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Location
      Jacksonville NC
      Posts
      400
      Country Flag: United States
      A buddy had that problem and he was able to have his rim trimmed on the inside, it worked for him but not forsure if I would have do that.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Posts
      827
      Gavin, That backspace should clear all day long and is what we always do for 69 Camaros so it should definitely fit in there. Are you running 275/40s?

      These are 40+ year old cars where all kinds of things happen to them along the way, let alone somebody on the assembly line on Friday in a hurry to get to happy hour but that wheel should fit in there. Could your Moser be on the wide side?
      Jason

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Oregon
      Posts
      1,773
      Country Flag: United States
      Like Jay said, what's your WMS-WMS measurement on your axle housing? Typically disc conversions in the rear will move the wheels out another 1/16" to3/16" or so depending on the kit, so be sure to factor that into the solution...whatever that ends up being.

      Fitment issues aside, your car looks damn nice with the new shoes IMHO. Good luck tracking down the source of the problem and finding the best solution.

      Tobin
      KORE3
      It's what I does.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Monterey Peninsula
      Posts
      2,150
      Agree with Jay & Tobin,that b/s should fit all day long....gotta be the rearend.
      I run the same 18x10 Superspokes you have with 5.625" b/s and I have no issues,standard GM 12-bolt.I could actually run 1/4" spacers (sometimes I do) to pull them out a bit further.
      '67 Buick Skylark GS400 funny car "Ingenue" 8/10 HRM / Gasoline (Swedish) cover & feature 2/12
      World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car!
      Used to be known as musclecarjohn

      www.buickfunnycar.com
      http://www.facebook.com/ingenuebuickfunnycar

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      Jason Rushforth and I was discussing this the other day. We always do 6.0 BS. 5.5 on a 9.5 puts the other profile of the tire at the maximum , only extra room with a 10 is to the inside. The outer wheels house hum is more of a interference that the lip on orginal quarters.

      If safe mat, anyone doing any rim size can deduct 4" from the rim size (not the overall width), but the actual rim size, and get the correct B as you always have to protect the outer wheel profile with the panel.

      So if doing a
      8" Wheel, 4" BS
      9" Wheel, 5" BS
      9.5" Wheel, 5.5" BS
      10" Wheel, 6" BS
      Last edited by ProdigyCustoms; 01-06-2010 at 04:40 PM.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      IS that a new rear? is it 60.5?

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      australia
      Posts
      64
      thanx guys for the advice... the rear is one of moser 'crate' rears they list..complete with brakes etc. are these diffs the same width? i thought they were .

      todays update is - i tried to beat that damn hump under there and cracked the paint on the guard well and good. so now i will get a new rear quarter fitted and 'tweak' it while its off if thats at all possible. It did need doing down the track , but circumstances have changed

      I love the wheels Jason by the way ,, its the cars variables that have beat me.. being so low dont help me none either

      Gav
      Gav

      69 camaro rs/ss clone.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Monterey Peninsula
      Posts
      2,150
      bummer to hear about the paint Gavin...
      '67 Buick Skylark GS400 funny car "Ingenue" 8/10 HRM / Gasoline (Swedish) cover & feature 2/12
      World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car!
      Used to be known as musclecarjohn

      www.buickfunnycar.com
      http://www.facebook.com/ingenuebuickfunnycar

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      That wheel looks killer on there....great choice in wheels...sorry that the BS didn't work and the paint deal is a bummer too.
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    11. #11
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Corona, CA
      Posts
      1,948
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by JayR View Post
      Gavin, That backspace should clear all day long and is what we always do for 69 Camaros so it should definitely fit in there. Are you running 275/40s?

      These are 40+ year old cars where all kinds of things happen to them along the way, let alone somebody on the assembly line on Friday in a hurry to get to happy hour but that wheel should fit in there. Could your Moser be on the wide side?
      I completely agree with Jason's statement here. We run that 5.75" backspace all day long, and have not had any issues with that fitment, with a 275.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      111
      Gav, this is like one of my nightmares coming true. I can sympathize. We're compelled to piece together so many random parts for these old cars, who knows where it all ends up in the end.

      Hope you're able to resolve.
      car blog... updated sporadically. http://regans66.blogspot.com/

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      australia
      Posts
      64
      Do you think if i replace the rear quarter and outer wheelhouse it can be tweaked to tuck the tire better?. By some kinda modification? This is where im at.. I think because its had a bingle and repair previosly in that quarter its maybe not to factory spec and not in original position...thats my guess.

      Gav
      Gav

      69 camaro rs/ss clone.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      You need to measure that rear and see how much more you can go inboard. You said you have lots of room. As well you should. The extra 1/4" would make a real difference.

      Wat size are the tires?

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Sep 2009
      Posts
      29
      I would have to say im kinda freaking out because I just got my 10" rushforths in with a 285 but the car is on my rotissory atm and I just finished painting my stock rearend which is 60" and with all the research I have put in I shouldn't have a problem as long as the lips are folded as I did. So i would say your new rearend is probably 60.5 like it was previously posted. as for modifying your quarter and outer wheel well gl I just replaced both my inner and outer and full quarters so If you try adding a spacer between the inner and outer like a 1/2" to push out the quarter, the quarter might not line up at the bottom at the rocker but Im sure you could do a little metal work and filler to make it work out. Well gl buddy I just got the same wheels in a few weeks ago I love them they are beautiful I cant wait to get them on the car. Could I trouble you in taking a few full lenght car pictures with them on Oh did you do a 3" drop from hotckis? Anyways GL

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      australia
      Posts
      64
      Thanx Nick, heres a cupla other shots of my car... my wheel sizes are 18 x 10 with 275/40/18 nitto on rear. 5.75 b/s. ..Gav



      Gav

      69 camaro rs/ss clone.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Feb 2003
      Location
      Houston, TX
      Posts
      3,446
      Country Flag: United States
      Another option is to find a local machine shop with a mill. Remove the tires from the wheels, and have them mill off some more on the backside of that mounting pad. That is, if you have enough meat back there to allow the conical seats still have some material left under them. Post a pic of the backside of the lug pad, looking into a lug hole. We could look and see if it could be machined further.

      Also note your brake caliper clearance before doing any machining. As you mill that pad, the caliper gets closer to the spokes.
      Co-Founder, LS1TECH.com


      Forged Wheel Dealer, Contact me for a quote!
      www.DV8Motoring.com

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      Quote Originally Posted by Nicks69Camaro View Post
      I would have to say im kinda freaking out because I just got my 10" rushforths in with a 285 but the car is on my rotissory atm and I just finished painting my stock rearend which is 60" and with all the research I have put in I shouldn't have a problem as long as the lips are folded as I did. So i would say your new rearend is probably 60.5
      60.5 WITH brake drum. 60: flange to flange.

      My bet it the rear is right.

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      australia
      Posts
      64
      Quote Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
      Another option is to find a local machine shop with a mill. Remove the tires from the wheels, and have them mill off some more on the backside of that mounting pad. That is, if you have enough meat back there to allow the conical seats still have some material left under them. Post a pic of the backside of the lug pad, looking into a lug hole. We could look and see if it could be machined further.

      Also note your brake caliper clearance before doing any machining. As you mill that pad, the caliper gets closer to the spokes.
      thanx Nineball, i got drums back there... I did have a look at this yesterday and i probably could get away with a little off the back pad. I will fix the rear quarter first and see if i can get things back to square 1 ..I think it all comes from a repair from previous owner ..The panel was not pushed out to the factory position ..I can see hammer marks up in wheel house area.
      Gav
      Gav

      69 camaro rs/ss clone.

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Burnaby, BC, Canada
      Posts
      1,388
      Gav your car looks killer with the new wheels. Sorry about the 1/4 panel and wheel fitment problem.
      1969 CAMARO RS

      2002 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 452 rwhp, 425 rwtq
      Project pics of my '69
      Lateral-G Feature Page
      Camaro Performers Magazine Feature

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com