Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 34
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58

      New springs higher than stock

      Just looking for some anwers to what may be going on here... I just installed a Hotchkis TVS Extreme kit on my 67 Chevelle and it now is sitting like a top fuel drag car. From the top of the rear fender opening to the ground measures 29 inches. I was told that it should be more like 27 inches. What could be the cause of this????? The front is right where it should be for my pref. The problem is the back.

      Thanks for the info.
      Nick



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      They will settle a bit, all springs do. I'd say drive it a few hundred miles and remeasure.
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by jknight16 View Post
      They will settle a bit, all springs do. I'd say drive it a few hundred miles and remeasure.
      Yep... they will settle.

      If it is still bad, it could be binding. Explain how you installed the springs please....
      JC Scott


    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Posts
      352
      Can you post pics please? I want to see a 67 with just a tvs kit.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58
      You all say they will settle, that is fine I am expecting that but 2 inches? I have been told it is only half an inch to an inch that they settle. And the suspention travells I pushed on the bumper to see if it was binding. I have Frank from Prodigy Customs looking into it from a manufacturing point of view.


      And I appologize for the horrible pic but it is from my cell phone. I am about 50% in my resto, so I can't pull the car out and take decent photo's.
      Attached Images Attached Images  

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Quote Originally Posted by bergsvette View Post
      I am about 50% in my resto,
      Is the car at the final weight yet?
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States
      Yea, something doesn't look right..... I would hope that Hotchkis doesn't design any of their kits to look like that...
      JC Scott


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Central California
      Posts
      2,050
      Country Flag: United States
      On the Camaro, the front coils must be seated and "clocked." While I've never gotten hands-on familiar with the A-bodies, I'm guessing this is the same for the Chevelle fronts and rears. If the end of the spring isn't in the pocket, the car will sit higher as a result. With the TVS Extreme, there also may be components that have a final torque when the vehicle wheels are on the ground (or on blocks). If this torque is done unloaded, that will definitely cause a higher ride height.

      Did you compare the old and new springs side-by-side?

      My friend also has a '67 Chevelle with the TVS and it sits perfect. Handles great, too.

      Good luck,
      Mary Pozzi
      Last edited by mpozzi; 12-07-2009 at 11:21 AM.
      mpozzi . . . '73 Camaro RS, '69 Camaro SCCA/Trans-Am vintage racer, and a 1989 R7U 1LE Players Challenge car.

      "STICK, you B*TCH!!!!!!"

      "It's not a horse. You can't train it!! "


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58
      Quote Originally Posted by mpozzi View Post
      On the Camaro, the front coils must be seated and "clocked." While I've never gotten hands-on familiar with the A-bodies, I'm guessing this is the same for the Chevelle fronts and rears. If the end of the spring isn't in the pocket, the car will sit higher as a result. With the TVS Extreme, there also may be components that have a final torque when the vehicle wheels are on the ground (or on blocks). If this torque is done unloaded, that will definitely cause a higher ride height.

      Did you compare the old and new springs side-by-side?

      My friend also has a '67 Chevelle with the TVS and it sits perfect. Handles great, too.

      Good luck,
      Mary Pozzi
      Both sides on the rear are pig tailed and flat. So even I can't screw that up.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Location
      Austin Texas
      Posts
      641
      Looks like there is no interior.....

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58
      Correct... No interior and no glass. But that alone won't make up the two inches either.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by mpozzi View Post
      With the TVS Extreme, there also may be components that have a final torque when the vehicle wheels are on the ground (or on blocks). If this torque is done unloaded, that will definitely cause a higher ride height.
      That would have been my suggestion too...make sure none of the rear control arm bushings were torqued while the suspension was hanging. I'd loosen them up and bounce the car by hand a few times without the shocks hooked up.
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      Quote Originally Posted by bergsvette View Post
      Correct... No interior and no glass. But that alone won't make up the two inches either.
      Right, that alone will not make up two inches. But that combined with some spring settling, fuel load, etc. might get you more than you think.
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58
      Quote Originally Posted by jknight16 View Post
      Right, that alone will not make up two inches. But that combined with some spring settling, fuel load, etc. might get you more than you think.
      Ehhhh, good point!

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States
      Did you tighten down the rear springs when the car was up in the air?
      JC Scott


    16. #16
      Join Date
      Oct 2008
      Location
      Santa Fe Springs, CA
      Posts
      625
      Quote Originally Posted by bergsvette View Post
      Just looking for some anwers to what may be going on here... I just installed a Hotchkis TVS Extreme kit on my 67 Chevelle and it now is sitting like a top fuel drag car. From the top of the rear fender opening to the ground measures 29 inches. I was told that it should be more like 27 inches. What could be the cause of this????? The front is right where it should be for my pref. The problem is the back.

      Thanks for the info.
      Nick
      Nick, I see some other posters have asked you this, but most often when someone calls us with a car sitting like this, it's because they tightened everything up with the car in the air and the wheels hanging, causing bind when they drop it back down.

      Another thing to think about is that the combined weight of glass, interior, fuel, etc will make a difference, as will the settling of the springs during initial use.

      If you check the bind and weight and you are still having a problem, please call us and we'll help you figure out what's going on.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58
      Quote Originally Posted by Hotchkis View Post
      Nick, I see some other posters have asked you this, but most often when someone calls us with a car sitting like this, it's because they tightened everything up with the car in the air and the wheels hanging, causing bind when they drop it back down.

      Another thing to think about is that the combined weight of glass, interior, fuel, etc will make a difference, as will the settling of the springs during initial use.

      If you check the bind and weight and you are still having a problem, please call us and we'll help you figure out what's going on.

      I tightedned the entire kit with the jackstands under the rearend and under the lower control arms. So i could loosen and re tighten everything but I am not entirly sure that is it.

      And I did call you guys today. I told the tech. that I just installed your system and it was setting about 2 to 3 inches too high. I then asked about cutting the springs and he turned me away from that. He then informed me I would need to buy new springs and that you guys didn't carry anything like that. He told me to try OPG and that is where the conversation ended.

      My hang up is, I can't believe that the interior, to include the glass, will compress the springs 2 to 3 inches. Now like I said I will do my best to get under the car and loosen everything just to re tighten it.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States
      Just the interior and glass won't. The interior, glass, torquing everything at ride hight, and the springs settling will get you a lot closer, though.
      JC Scott


    19. #19
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      USA
      Posts
      4,462
      Country Flag: United States
      It will settle a couple of inches after you get it fully assembled and drive it.
      Also , you need to tighten the suspension bolts with the complete weight of the car on the tires , not on jackstands .
      It does make a difference.
      Use a drive-on lift if you can borrow one..
      Jeff Tate
      U.S.A.
      "The best thing about participating in these events is that you get to hang out with a group of intelligent like minded people who live to achieve things in their lives. You won't find a lazy, mean, or dumb bone in their bodies." Bret Voelkel, RideTech

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Sunbury, PA
      Posts
      58
      Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTATE View Post
      It will settle a couple of inches after you get it fully assembled and drive it.
      Also , you need to tighten the suspension bolts with the complete weight of the car on the tires , not on jackstands .
      It does make a difference.
      Use a drive-on lift if you can borrow one..

      Ok you are easing my nerves a little bit but if it will settle that much then I am screwed up front. It is setting correct now, if it droppes a couple of inches I will need to get taller springs..... hahah I am sure all will work out just fine...

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com