Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14

    Threaded View

    1. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      state of confusion
      Posts
      1,499
      Country Flag: United States
      Usually, the c/d ratio (using your nomenclature) is within a couple percent of 1.00 with the chassis at its static ride height. After squaring for wheel rate purposes, it's still only 'off' by 5% or so. That's for a car with reasonably stock-ish geometry and wheel offset.

      Note also that the FVIC component of motion ratio is slightly variable in both ride and roll modes as the FVSA lengths vary. A rather complicated formula could be written to cover this variability in "c" and "d", but nobody would ever use it outside of developing a spreadsheet or other computerized analysis.



      I suspect that most people figure that keeping the theoretical numbers within 5% is close enough most of the time. Then again, I've seen the spring angle correction factor not being squared (it should be), so I hope I'm not assuming too much.

      Just for comparison, the 5658, 5660, 5662, and 5664 Moog springs are in approximately 10% rate steps.

      Norm
      '08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
      '19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
      Gone but not forgotten dep't:
      '01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com