Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 9 of 9
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Location
      Chandler, Az (from west NE)
      Posts
      240
      Country Flag: United States

      PT Cruiser Watts Link

      Happened to notice a conventional watts link under a PT Cruiser the other day. Left before I got a chance to really examine it. Has anyone gotten a chance to check it out, yet? Thanks.

      Ric

      Ric

      2002 s10, DD and AutoX.
      1966 Malibu owned since 1971. Drag car converting to track toy!


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Newark DE
      Posts
      238
      Country Flag: United States
      Here is a pic of one on ebay for 79.99 plus shipping. One thing I do not like is it is single sheer and uses tierod ends.



      Quote from auction. (google search shows they are a dealership)
      This is a very common problem among the PT Cruiser, if you hear a rattle coming from your rear suspension, this link is most likely the problem.
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/PT-Cr...ILFQ3aBEQ3a105

      I built my own for about $35 and and hour or so of time.

      Attached Images Attached Images  

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Location
      Chandler, Az (from west NE)
      Posts
      240
      Country Flag: United States
      Interesting. What do you use for bearings, and how do you retain them in the sleeve? Thanks
      Ric

      2002 s10, DD and AutoX.
      1966 Malibu owned since 1971. Drag car converting to track toy!

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Newark DE
      Posts
      238
      Country Flag: United States
      I used sealed ball bearings, 0.750 ID x 1.750 OD x 0.500 wide. Can't find the load specs at moment. This should answer any other questions.
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...72&postcount=5

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Location
      Chandler, Az (from west NE)
      Posts
      240
      Country Flag: United States
      That is great! Thanks for sharing. Looked at Fays2's site, also. Very informative.
      Ric

      2002 s10, DD and AutoX.
      1966 Malibu owned since 1971. Drag car converting to track toy!

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jun 2003
      Posts
      370
      Country Flag: United States
      You might also want to take a look at the durango setup.



      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=55215

      Though it is still a single sheer linkage in the middle.
      Paul
      1955 Chevrolet 210 Delray 2 Door Sedan
      1965 Impala Two Door Hardtop
      1968 Pontiac Firebird


    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Location
      Chandler, Az (from west NE)
      Posts
      240
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks, Paul. I actualy got to see one of the Durango's on the shop yesterday, and while it's a little more HD than the PT,. I like the one that Eric showed above in his thumbnail and I think the idea of a frame mounted wishbone will work better for a beginner who doesn't have a lot of time for multiple trials and adjustments. I'm sure those that work with thses all the time would know better. I suppose the Durango one could be used for a R&D piece, Ya think the rear cover could be made to fit an 8.5???lol
      Last edited by rixtrix1; 09-16-2009 at 06:14 PM. Reason: spelling
      Ric

      2002 s10, DD and AutoX.
      1966 Malibu owned since 1971. Drag car converting to track toy!

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      PA.
      Posts
      935
      Country Flag: United States
      I`ve looked at the PT Cruiser, Durango and Crown Vic watts links and they`re all made of very flimsy stuff. Typical OE. IMO you`re a lot better off with a frame mounted bellcrank/propeller anyway. It lets you add an additional crossmember which contributes to better chassis stiffness. It eliminates the need for custom diff covers and such and best of all it couples the RC to the CG, keeping the moment arm between them exactly the same at all times which is a huge contributor to linear and predictable suspension behavior.
      Even knowing the benefits of a watts on paper I was honestly stunned by the improvement in our test car when I added a Fays2 watts link. It made a car whos rear suspension, by OE design had always been somewhat quirky, very smooth and linear. It`s really easy to push the car right up to it`s maximum limits now and there`s no penalty in ride quality. I`ve become a big believer in watts links since so I`m glad to see them getting the attention they deserve. Mark SC&C
      Last edited by Marcus SC&C; 09-18-2009 at 08:46 AM.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Single shear isn't a bad thing as long as the safety factor is high enough. I wouldn't discount that type of design, the loads aren't astronomically high there anyway.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com