Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 31
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States

      GM's LSA crate engine...

      What do you guys think? Seems Lingenfelter was able to get 630/630 out of it with just a pulley change, some tuning and a cold air kit... I would imagine that would bump up quite a bit with some long tubes and a ported heads, not to mention a cam swap.

      One thing I can't find is info on the intercooler. I know it's different from the LS9, but is it still water based? If so I was thinging one could (if not running a heater) hardline from the unused waterpump ports to the intercooler.

      Also, is there any reason why standard LS2 headers wouldn't mate up to the heads? They are just slightly modified LS3 heads right?
      Looks like it might be promising for a swap and it's a ton cheaper than the LS9.

      Also, I'm trying to find out if the alternator (low mount) sits equal to or higher than an f-body alternator. thoughts?

      Lastly I'm trying to find this shot but without the plastic cover. Anyone?



      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      The intercooler is a seperate water-based heat exchanger system. Using the radiator coolant would be counter productive.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
      What do you guys think? Seems Lingenfelter was able to get 630/630 out of it with just a pulley change, some tuning and a cold air kit... I would imagine that would bump up quite a bit with some long tubes and a ported heads, not to mention a cam swap.

      One thing I can't find is info on the intercooler. I know it's different from the LS9, but is it still water based? If so I was thinging one could (if not running a heater) hardline from the unused waterpump ports to the intercooler. Should be. I don't know of any factory roots style supercharger system that wasn't water to air. I also don't see how it could be anything other than water based. I've never thought about the heater line trick. However, the engine coolant gets much hotter than the intercooler coolant. The water pump for the intercooler is electric, light weight, and quiet. I'd just run that.

      Also, is there any reason why standard LS2 headers wouldn't mate up to the heads? They are just slightly modified LS3 heads right?
      Looks like it might be promising for a swap and it's a ton cheaper than the LS9. Should be able to just run 1-7/8" primary headers, yes.

      Also, I'm trying to find out if the alternator (low mount) sits equal to or higher than an f-body alternator. thoughts? Looks more forward than anythign else. Looks lower to me. It is definitely not higher.

      Lastly I'm trying to find this shot but without the plastic cover. Anyone? Would love to see this myself as I think the plastic cover is crappy looking. Why cover up a gorgeous supercharger?
      I think it would be a great choice over the LS9. Much like I think a stroker LS2/3 is a better choice than an LS7.
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Tallahassee
      Posts
      295
      Not sure of any technical stuff....but I can't help but stare directly at the picture!

      Getting on the fringe of the ZR1/LS9 performance potential on the cheap there for sure though.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
      The intercooler is a seperate water-based heat exchanger system. Using the radiator coolant would be counter productive.

      I sort of thought that.. so you would need a small pump to an seperate radiator. Hmmm... That's a packaging challenge.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Carlsbad, Ca
      Posts
      1,213
      Country Flag: United States
      how much cheaper than the ls9?
      Tim

      The WidowMaker: Garage Built 70 Chevelle

      Special Thanks To: Rushforth Wheels, MuscleRodz, Kore3 & SC&C

      Build Thread Link

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Wa
      Posts
      567
      I think around 8k cheaper. For that extra scratch you get a bigger blower, forged pistons, titanium rods and intake valves among other things.
      Bob

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Location
      new braunfels, tx
      Posts
      545
      Country Flag: United States
      dunno if either of these will help.

      http://blog.niot.net/blog-images/det...ay-display.jpg

      http://caddyinfo.com/wordpress/?p=551

      when you get a chance, reply to those PMs i sent to you if you could.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
      I think around 8k cheaper. For that extra scratch you get a bigger blower, forged pistons, titanium rods and intake valves among other things.
      Actually it's more like 10-12k cheaper.. that's a LOT of cash..
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Wa
      Posts
      567
      I thought the LSA is 15k and the LS9 is about 22
      Bob

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      So Cal
      Posts
      263
      Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
      I thought the LSA is 15k and the LS9 is about 22
      LSA = http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...&ProdID=249801 is $14,295.00

      LS9 = http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...&ProdID=248897 is $20,995.00

      I am guessing special engine management system? don't know for sure but I would think yes.....
      Tom
      1969 Chevelle

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Location
      Crofton, MD
      Posts
      161
      Personally, I wouldn't do either one of those...

      LS forged low compression shortblock (427, 440 or even use an LSX 454), a good set of heads (Trickflow 235's), a Magnuson supercharger, and meth injection... scrounge around for the covers/accessories... and you will have an easy 850 horsepower on pump gas for about what you are talking for the LSA.

      And could easily be tuned with a factory computer by a good tuner...

      GM EFI Tuner
      1980 Z28 Pro-touring project - sold
      2002 Trans Am 9.41 at 143mph on pump gas and drag radials - sold

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Eastern Virginia
      Posts
      3,963
      Country Flag: United States
      This is a cool shot:

      Scot
      86 Monte SS


    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by tom_a View Post
      LSA = http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...&ProdID=249801 is $14,295.00

      LS9 = http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...&ProdID=248897 is $20,995.00

      I am guessing special engine management system? don't know for sure but I would think yes.....

      Wasn't the LS9 about 28k when it first came out? I imagin the LSA will drop as well once it's bee out for awhile. $7k isn't as big of a price difference as I thought (although it's still a lot of $$$)

      And this is all just theoretical talk since GMPP was talking with me yesterday about selling LSA crate engines.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Waco, TX
      Posts
      22
      So what's the hunk-of-something off on the drivers' side of the oil pan - oil cooler?
      1979 Z28 - Project BubbaZ, receiving LS2/6-speed/APS Twin Turbo setup
      1994 Z28 Vert - 383'd, cowl'd, spoil'd, slam'd fun

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Camaroholic View Post
      So what's the hunk-of-something off on the drivers' side of the oil pan - oil cooler?
      Yep, all GM's hipo stuff has that cooler now, even the 2010 Camaro.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      So Cal
      Posts
      263
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
      Wasn't the LS9 about 28k when it first came out? I imagin the LSA will drop as well once it's bee out for awhile. $7k isn't as big of a price difference as I thought (although it's still a lot of $$$)

      And this is all just theoretical talk since GMPP was talking with me yesterday about selling LSA crate engines.
      I think you are right as I recall it was a high number like 28K. I think Street and Perf was selling around 23-25K. One of the guys there told me they had sold (14) LS9's so I am sure we will see more popping up in projects. I am not sure if the Pace numbers are valid so I was only going by their web content.
      Tom
      1969 Chevelle

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      If I can fit the pump and intercooler ltr (low temperature radiator) in mine, it for sure will fit in yours.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
      If I can fit the pump and intercooler ltr (low temperature radiator) in mine, it for sure will fit in yours.
      Well, this isn't for Penny.. too complicated and like to keep that car simple.

      But we are looking at putting on in the American Hereos car this year.

      Since I KNOW they will ask me to write it I'm just studying up.

      Although it is tempting since GMPP would shoot me over one for Penny.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      There's a boatload of room in that car. It would take some fabrication to get the LTR in front of everything, but it should be pretty straight forward.

      The accessory drive on that engine is super nice and would be fairly simple to adapt to the chassis. Doing a good cold air system would be the hardest thing. I smell a custom cowl induction system.......
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com