Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
06-16-2009 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 457
theoretical: what's a blower got that high compression ain't got?
I understand a lot of the basics of forced induction but this kind of stumped me.
If the whole point of forced induction is to squeeze the A/F mixture harder before blowing it, then why not just use compression to do the job and forget the mechanical air pumps?
Of course the limitation on high compression becomes the octane rating of the gas . . . but that's also a limitation when you do super/turbocharging. What does S/Tcharging have that makes it better?
-
06-16-2009 #2Forced induction squeezes MORE air into the cylinders, it doesn't just increase the pressure in the cylinder.
Jason Scheer
06-16-2009 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Keller, Texas
- Posts
- 250
and more compression plus more boost equals even more horsepower, again assuming you have the correct fuel to keep from igniting until it is time.
Greg
1970 challenger convert-in process
1970 barracuda-driver
06-16-2009 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 457
Thanks for the replies, but I still don't get it.
What about this:
If an OEM wants to squeeze some more power out of an existing motor, they might put a blower onto it. If they do this they will probably only boost it a few PSI over atmospheric, so as not to outrun the capabilities of pump gas.
Now, in this scenario, why not just raise the compression instead of going to all the trouble of using that blower?
Isn't the ultimate limit on the usable cylinder pressure gonna be the gasoline's octane rating either way? Regardless of how that XXX pounds of pressure was achieved, mechanical air pump or piston compression?
----------
06-16-2009 #5



Reply With Quote