Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      457

      theoretical: what's a blower got that high compression ain't got?

      I understand a lot of the basics of forced induction but this kind of stumped me.


      If the whole point of forced induction is to squeeze the A/F mixture harder before blowing it, then why not just use compression to do the job and forget the mechanical air pumps?

      Of course the limitation on high compression becomes the octane rating of the gas . . . but that's also a limitation when you do super/turbocharging. What does S/Tcharging have that makes it better?



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Patterson, NY
      Posts
      784
      Forced induction squeezes MORE air into the cylinders, it doesn't just increase the pressure in the cylinder.
      Jason Scheer

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Keller, Texas
      Posts
      250
      and more compression plus more boost equals even more horsepower, again assuming you have the correct fuel to keep from igniting until it is time.
      Greg
      1970 challenger convert-in process
      1970 barracuda-driver

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      457
      Thanks for the replies, but I still don't get it.



      What about this:

      If an OEM wants to squeeze some more power out of an existing motor, they might put a blower onto it. If they do this they will probably only boost it a few PSI over atmospheric, so as not to outrun the capabilities of pump gas.

      Now, in this scenario, why not just raise the compression instead of going to all the trouble of using that blower?

      Isn't the ultimate limit on the usable cylinder pressure gonna be the gasoline's octane rating either way? Regardless of how that XXX pounds of pressure was achieved, mechanical air pump or piston compression?


      ----------

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Sacramento Ca
      Posts
      6,827
      Country Flag: United States
      Because raising the combustion pressure lowers the overall volume of air molecules in the chamber. Boost stuffs MORE in. A LOT more. More molecules, tighter packed. Simply increasing compression doesn't create more molecules in the chamber, the vacuum stays the same, so only pulls in enough to fill the volume of the chamber. See?



      The fuel curve is changed in a supercharged car to deal with this "boost" of air. And more power is created.

      /simplest i can make it.
      Tony Langlois
      1966 Corvair Monza

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Posts
      467
      Plus all the good setups use an intercooler that strips out much of the heat added by the compressor or blower, keeping temps down and allowing pump gas. Much of detonation revolves around the temps seen in the chamber, not the octane of the gas.

      Jim
      Don't take a knife to a gunfight.

      Half-Assed = Half-Fast

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      Tony is correct. It is not a pressure issue it is the volume of air in the cylinders that matters. Your engine is an air pump. It is burning the oxygen in the air. It merely consumes the fuel. Dumping in more fuel doesn't make more power. Dumping in more air does. Having the appropriate amount of fuel ensures that the metal parts in the engine are not consumed by the burning oxygen. That's why going too lean destroys the metal pistons and metal spark plugs.

      N2O works because when it burns it creates more oxygen in the cylinder because again, it is the oxygen in the air that is creating power. Spraying N2O is closer to boosting an engine instead of raising compression.

      The simple answer to your question of what a blower has that high compression doesn't is more air(oxygen).
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      Springfield, MO
      Posts
      4,470
      Country Flag: United States
      Higher compression still relies on volumetric effency of the engine (since I can't spell, VE!). Boost throws VE out the window by cramming in more air/fuel than what can naturally be "sucked" in.
      That is the easy way it was explained to me years ago.
      Jimmy

      69 Camaro Twin Turbo'd
      58 Nomad 348 Baby Rat

      http://www.fquick.com/shmoov69


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      457
      AAAHHH!

      Okay, got it.

      I was thinking too much about the pressure alone creating power, and forgetting that the raw "displacement" of the motor was being artificially increased by the blower method too. Makes sense to me now.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by mikedc View Post
      AAAHHH!

      Okay, got it.

      I was thinking too much about the pressure alone creating power, and forgetting that the raw "displacement" of the motor was being artificially increased by the blower method too. Makes sense to me now.
      Not necessarily. Roots blowers are positive displacement blowers and I think screw blowers are too. A centrifugal blower(I believe Prochargers are called this) are not positive displacement blowers. A turbo is not positive displacement either. The difference can be easily felt when driving/riding in a car that has the different types of blowers on them. A Procharger is like a turbo, it must have RPMs in order to produce boost. A roots blower does not. It produces full boost from the get go. However, they all do the same thing and that's cram more air into the cylinders than can be achieved naturally. That's how they make the engine produce more power.
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com