Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
    Results 21 to 28 of 28
    1. #21
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Olathe, KS
      Posts
      1,158
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by chevy42083 View Post
      The pinion angle change was addressed with the adjustable links... interesting... but just a band-aid. Although, the longer the arm, the less the pinion changes. Depending on how far back the motor sits, and how long those links are, it may not be too bad. Don't most truck arm/2link setups just mount like a leaf spring and use shims to adjust pinion angle? While more of a pain... it would be must cleaner looking. Though this setup probably looks awesomely high tech and ingenious to the average joe.


      The A/C compressor converted to an engine driver compressor for bags is gaining popularity. No noise, plenty of air, one less electrical draw, and one less "thing" to pack somewhere.
      It's probably a matter of semantics; but for clarification, the pinion angle change through the suspension's arc can not be addressed with a static link. Regardless of it's adjustability. You can correct it for ride height, but you'll still have the same change with travel. You're absolutely right that a longer arm would help with the angular change. I have a similar setup on the front of my TJ. Long arms mounting on a belly skid to the bottom of the axle, then smaller arms mounted between the upper mount and lower link for controlling pinion angle.



    2. #22
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Location
      Houston, TX
      Posts
      31
      Yeah... I wasn't very clear. I just meant it could be adjusted after being put on the road to get the best out of the setup.... not that it would change or anything. A perfect design before hand would negate the need completely.. but would be "set" at proper at a given ride height.
      1994 S-10 LT1/700r4

    3. #23
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      343
      that suspention was built to gain alot of lift. thus the bags on the bars to clear the massive wheels and the low fenders. not but its diffently not a good racing suspention but for low and slow crusing to town driving it would be fine. is there a better option. well yea but its not bad

    4. #24
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Posts
      134
      With the bags and shocks at the front of the arms it will have a very soft ride with poor control.

      The front balljoint is way beyond the proper angle. Complete with torched a-arm.

      If those rear links would self adjust pinion angle as the suspension rose then he'd really have something neat.

    5. #25
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      4,210
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by terryr View Post
      With the bags and shocks at the front of the arms it will have a very soft ride with poor control.

      The front balljoint is way beyond the proper angle. Complete with torched a-arm.

      If those rear links would self adjust pinion angle as the suspension rose then he'd really have something neat.
      Great minds think alike. I was thinking all of what you wrote. That front control arm and ball joint are scary. I've seen a lot of similar wheels on pickups and SUV's.

      The owner should install some limiting straps. Those shocks look like they are maxed out and holding up the rear axle. Last time I checked, that's not good for shocks or airbags.
      Last edited by TonyHuntimer; 05-21-2009 at 07:31 PM.
      @Camaro.Family Camaros
      1967 #QuickChangeCamaro - SpeedTech Suspension LS1/T56
      1967 #CFBee - SpeedTech Suspension SuperCharged LS3/T56
      1969 #TaxReturnCamaro Art Morrison Suspension 496/T56
      1986 #IROCdaily - Stock IROC

    6. #26
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    7. #27
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Posts
      186
      Quote Originally Posted by Lowend View Post
      LOL... I like the look of the car and would drive it if Kitty could ride shotgun!
      Frank

    8. #28
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      ahhh come on...Toonces would roll dat!


      vince
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com