Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2008
      Location
      Elkhart, Indiana
      Posts
      64

      Honest Opinions on LRCAs

      I am looking to build my own set of lower rear control arms on my 1967 Cutlass. There is alot of them out there to choose from and alot of prices to go along with them. I am planning on building my own with some DOM tubing I have laying around. I am thinking of using the adjustible Currie Johnny Joints on one end and a solid poly bushed opposing end. I was thinking of using a greasable bolt for the solid end to keep the bushing from squeaking, or should I just put a grease zert on the outside and that should work pretty good. I am not saying that I don't like their Currie lower rear control arm, I just think I can build one that I prefer for cheaper. Any opinions would be great.
      This is the end I am thinking of using

      but with the GM ball center.
      Stephan

      1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass
      468 BB Olds
      Future plans dual throttle-body injection
      Pro-touring suspension
      Nice stock looking interior



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      west michigan
      Posts
      514
      Country Flag: United States
      I am looking for something similar. I have been thinking about those too.
      Chad Read

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2008
      Location
      Elkhart, Indiana
      Posts
      64
      I just couldn't find anything that hit me right without heim joints. So idecided to build my own.

      Stephan
      1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass
      468 BB Olds
      Future plans dual throttle-body injection
      Pro-touring suspension
      Nice stock looking interior


    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Central Illinois
      Posts
      152
      I've had a set of Global West lower on my '68 for years. They're the ones with the spherical front bearing and del-alum rear bearing. No problems. Have you looked at these, or is it just a cost issue?
      '68 442 convertible
      5 SPEED - EFI

      '66 442 Hardtop
      in process

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      use afco swedged steel tube, they have all lengths in 1" increments. Each side is threaded with LH and RH, makes for easy on car adjustments. Next order some chrome moly rodends with teflon liner (30,000lb load raitng). This will be a cheaper upgrade. $30 a rodend and $15-20 for the tube. the only thing to fab would be the spacers for the chassis and axle mounts,and thats just cuting an aluminum spacer to length.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2008
      Location
      Elkhart, Indiana
      Posts
      64
      Quote Originally Posted by CHILI442 View Post
      I've had a set of Global West lower on my '68 for years. They're the ones with the spherical front bearing and del-alum rear bearing. No problems. Have you looked at these, or is it just a cost issue?
      I guess it is more of the cost issue. And since I have the resources to be able to create what I have in my head I guess I would rather do it that way. Plus I like to say that I did and fabricate all or most the parts on my car.

      Stephan
      1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass
      468 BB Olds
      Future plans dual throttle-body injection
      Pro-touring suspension
      Nice stock looking interior


    7. #7
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Location
      Lehigh Valley Pa
      Posts
      1,269
      1996 Federal Cadillac hearse
      1988 Eureka Chevy hearse

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      west michigan
      Posts
      514
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by The Stickman View Post

      great link
      Chad Read

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2008
      Location
      Elkhart, Indiana
      Posts
      64
      Quote Originally Posted by The Stickman View Post
      I agree nice write-up. I like those better than my original idea. I am going to change my direction now.

      Thanks Stephan
      1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass
      468 BB Olds
      Future plans dual throttle-body injection
      Pro-touring suspension
      Nice stock looking interior


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Loganville, GA
      Posts
      931
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by falcon65 View Post
      use afco swedged steel tube, they have all lengths in 1" increments. Each side is threaded with LH and RH, makes for easy on car adjustments. Next order some chrome moly rodends with teflon liner (30,000lb load raitng). This will be a cheaper upgrade. $30 a rodend and $15-20 for the tube. the only thing to fab would be the spacers for the chassis and axle mounts,and thats just cuting an aluminum spacer to length.
      You can use the old sleeves out of the stock bushings. They fit perfectly into 3/4" helm joints. You can add side spacers if so desired, but mine haven't moved in the year they have been on my car, in both street use and autocross.
      2018 Cruze LT Hatchback
      2003 Suburban 2500 8.1L
      1975 MGB Roadster
      2003 GSX750F Katana

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Chicago
      Posts
      295
      Quote Originally Posted by The Stickman View Post
      Cool link!

      I think the aluminum is going to be good with the rod ends... his numbers check out for a theoretical buckling failure in compression.

      However, bending loads go up any time you have binding (aka when using rubber), and then you have a whole other loading scenario. I wouldn't run the aluminum with rubber or poly bushings. Just my .02... I didn't bother running a bending calculation...
      Luke
      '63 Chevy II wagon - project

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      Aluminum seams like a good idea; however, dont forget that aluminum (Al) can work harden. This will happen when Al is used in suspension. Because Al is much more elastic than steel it needs to be made heavier to regain the stiffness. Also, the ultimate loads on the Al tube is fine but do a comparison to the deflection of the Al and steel tube. After the Al is stiff enough to minimize deflections the weight saving is minimal when compared to swedged steel tubes.

      This is the reason i went with steel on my custom front suspension.

      Now carbon fiber would be trick. Stiffer and stronger than steel but has the catasrophic failure issue.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      state of confusion
      Posts
      1,499
      Country Flag: United States
      Last I knew, Jon Aadland was running a rod end and a hard rubber bushing rod end replacement in each LCA. FWIW, Jon is an engineer at Boeing, and a pretty sharp one from what I've seen on various other forums over the years.

      I've never run a bending analysis of LCAs either, though I suspect that as long as you aren't trying to run something really hard like cylindrical Delrin bushings in both LCA ends or use them for spring perches a la the Fox/SN95 Mustangs that Aluminum will be OK. His LCAs did survive a crash that bent the axle . . .

      True, the weight savings isn't going to be huge, at least not in any street-driven front engine V8 RWD car. But it is do-able.


      Norm
      '08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
      '19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
      Gone but not forgotten dep't:
      '01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      PA.
      Posts
      935
      Country Flag: United States
      It`s hard to find ends with greasable polygraphite bushings in them. Most,if not all are non greasable straight poly. I don`t care much for them due to squeaking/binding issues. If you`re making your own why not just use Johnny Joints on both ends? It`s only a couple bucks more to do it right. The Johnny joints will outlast heims at least 3:1,which makes them a lot cheaper in the long run. All he time they`ll have much better NVH isolation and the exact same range of motion. If you ever wear a set out (you won`t) you can adj. the lash and keep running them or even rebuild them for cheap instead of replacing them. Mark SC&C




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com