Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 19 of 19
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      34

      home brewed suspension advice

      i plan on building this road course car that i have had up my sleeve and need advice on building my front susp. i plan on doing my own work but need a basis. i would like to use the mustang 2 for the simple means of getting parts. on the other hand u have the viper and corvette front end. i am trying to stick with the budget theme to an extent. i know viper parts are expensive but i have read that it works like know other. the vette has plenty of parts everywhere. i really just need to know if the you can make the mustang 2 handle the extreme.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Olathe, KS
      Posts
      1,158
      Country Flag: United States
      the C5/6 components have been proven on here time and time again. On the other end of the spectrum you'll find the Mustang II.
      Doing a quick search of the forum will give you gobs of reasons as to why it's not as good of an idea as it seems.

      Even with the best parts, it requires the best planning and execution to make it work. A well thought out stock type setup will run circles around an improperly set up C5. If you're serious about building a suspension, plan on spending quite a bit of time reading. I remember seeing a thread not long ago about everyone's favorite books.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      What type of car?
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      +1 it's kinda hard to advise without knowing the platform
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      34
      dont laugh but its a 1980 dodge aspen. the entire front end is junk. (your probably telling yourself that the whole car is junk) it has the weirdest torsion that i have ever seen and its coming off. none of the componets from a abody will work. however i did just find out that magnum force builds a front end for it so we will have to see.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      IL/TN
      Posts
      908
      Country Flag: United States
      Mustamg II was not designed for heavyer cars, plus it's nearly impossible to design a good geometry with those parts on larger cars, as far as using Viper or Corvette parts that will not automaticly make it handle like either, you need to design the suspension and get the geometry designed correctly and see what control arms and spindles will accomplish your goal
      https://www.protouringf-body.com "doing what they say can't be done"

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      I think you are probably biting off a project you won't be happy with...
      But the stuff you need is here
      http://www.stockcarproducts.com/ftsusp.htm
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      34
      THANKS lowened. i have seen that site once before but couldnt remember it. i need it for parts for the dirt track cars i will be building for a friend as well as my race car. and i understand were your coming from about using this car as a project. but it will be a race car only. all go no show. the aspen was used in nascar in the 80s. chrysler even sold a richard petty kit car. (it was still ugly as sin). but the car that catches my attention is the imsa/roadrace kit car.


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      ... that does look pretty cool
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      IL/TN
      Posts
      908
      Country Flag: United States
      now that's cool looking..
      https://www.protouringf-body.com "doing what they say can't be done"

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      [/quote]
      Is that your car?

      BTW, I dig these cars, I'm working on a 4th gen Nova, they were used in NASCAR too.

      --JMarsa

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      34
      i wish it was my car.
      i got to start from the beginning. but you got to start somewhere right.
      i picked a grandma owned 80 model aspen for 400 bucks. (i think i bought it cause it was so cheap with no idea what i was going to do with it.) then i put it in my barn. i came across a few pictures of this car and came to a conclusion. i think it will make a good race car.(maybe street car) it will take a while since i have a harley and dakota i am building along with my 67 coronet.

      back to the suspension, i think i will make most of my own stuff. things like the spindles and ball joints i will buy even though i could probably make the spindles i will leave it to the pros. that has to be pretty precise. most will be gm componets since parts are readily available. (it would probably be a good idea to document every part for the future breaks and repairs.) the spindles i will go with will have adjustable kingpin angles. which is what i have been looking for. i will build my own A-arms. i guess the ideas are a start right.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      Depending on your budget I would look hard at designing you're own using off the shelf circle track parts. They are a good bang for your buck. You just need to have a good design and the ability to build it. Another choice would be if there's any circle track shops in the area you might be able to get a road course stub built for 1/4-1/2 of what the subframes are going for from the big shops. Since you will have a full cage you can make it modular.

      --JMarsa

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Years back we used the Mustang II spindle but our own geometry. We've set records with that system, and is still to this day one of the best aftermarket suspensions out there. It can be done for sure.

      The Wilwood spindle is probably your best bet. It's similar to the Mustang II but is 1/2" taller, which works wonders for reducing roll center migration while still keeping a great camber gain. Something to thank about, anyway.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      34
      i do think i need to go with as many off the shelf parts as possible. it is a race car and it will probably get crashed. and if it does i dont want to have to worry about building a arms and stuff like that. it just make sense. you need to be able to put it back together as quickly as possible. i think i will buy the left and right side assemblies and just build my subframe. i am going to use a bunch of circle track parts since it is cheap. uhh cheaper. my only deal is that i want as much adjustment as possible. which is what everybody looks for i guess. i do agree that the mustang 2 can hold up. ive seen the the M2 fronts go through alot of abuse on dirt ovals. besides that they are used to often and have proven themselves to be worthy.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Olathe, KS
      Posts
      1,158
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by mayhem148 View Post
      i do think i need to go with as many off the shelf parts as possible. it is a race car and it will probably get crashed. and if it does i dont want to have to worry about building a arms and stuff like that. it just make sense. you need to be able to put it back together as quickly as possible. i think i will buy the left and right side assemblies and just build my subframe. i am going to use a bunch of circle track parts since it is cheap. uhh cheaper. my only deal is that i want as much adjustment as possible. which is what everybody looks for i guess. i do agree that the mustang 2 can hold up. ive seen the the M2 fronts go through alot of abuse on dirt ovals. besides that they are used to often and have proven themselves to be worthy.
      While I agree that the components have proven themselves, I would disagree that you should make wholesale use of the mustang II front.
      As was stated earlier, the geometry can be drastically improved upon.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Chesapeake, VA
      Posts
      679
      Silver69camaro "Years back we used the Mustang II spindle but our own geometry. We've set records with that system, and is still to this day one of the best aftermarket suspensions out there. It can be done for sure."

      And I notice that your weld in crossmember hub to hub package is within about $400 or less down to practically identical in price as compared to the "street rod" vendors. That's an absolute bargain for the engineering required for the results you get. For so little difference in price I'd feel stupid if I went to the large dude for my ifs.
      Cars are meant to be driven.

      John B

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      34
      i never thought about that JB. it is lighter. and in my book lighter is faster. i think i can piece part the stuff i need together. im sure i will be on hear again in the future to get more help.
      yeah the factory componets of a mustang 2 could use better geometry, but i am sure someone out there makes the solution. i will just have to do some shopping. or just get on here and ask everybody where to buy parts.

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Location
      New Jersey
      Posts
      72
      I built my front and rear suspension from scratch using the factory frame that I modified to accept the new suspension. Take it from me it takes a long time to do this. I am very happy with the results the car handles beyond my expectations. If you are looking for a quick and easy solution they do sell complete Nascar front clips that you might be able to connect it to the rest of the chassis/body. Someone mentioned earlier designing a car to handle is a lot more involved than just bolting on parts that work on other cars and hope they will work on your. He is absolutely correct and I wish it was just that easy. The length and placement of control arms between the mounting locations and pivot points play a very crucial role on your caster/camber curve. Your shock and spring location has to be determine to get a good spring/wheel rate. Spindles also help in the suspension design that will tie in the height of you upper ball joints which once you start connecting all the lines that will determine your front roll center. In the past I have used some basic computer software programs that you can lay out and test your suspension before you weld everything up. I wish you Good Luck it is great that you are doing something different I did and look how it turned out. I love it when people say it can not be done and you prove them wrong. Most people can not look outside the box, a true car guy not only looks outside the box but he puts wheels on it and make it go faster.lol


      Don Stellhorn
      www.gtoroadracer.com
      1964 GTO Road Race car
      (Top 10 Hot Rod Magazine 2006)
      Featured in December 2006 HotRod and
      June 2008 High Performance Pontiac




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com