Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
    Results 21 to 36 of 36

    Thread: Unusual 305

    1. #21
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Quote Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
      what's the bore on the mighty 5.7 liter LS1? i know it's somewhat less than 4", and they make good power and are more efficient compared to the older stuff with 4" bores.
      The 5.7L LS engines do have a smaller bore, but the heads flow as much as big block heads - that's where the power comes from.

      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises


    2. #22
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Cumberland, Maryland
      Posts
      552
      Country Flag: United States
      One more time for clarification sake. It's not the bore size thats the problem by itself. It's the fact that the bore size limits the heads(valve size, valve shrouding, valve to bore clearance) in the case of the 305.

    3. #23
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      correct. The bores of Ferraris and the like are small and yet they scream. It's all in the head design. If someone really wanted to make a head/intake combo to properly feed a 305, it would work fine.
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    4. #24
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Posts
      59
      or you could be like some of the people i went to school with

      "put some 350 heads on it and it will be a 350"

      lol

    5. #25
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      213
      I see my post got a little side tracked...anyone answer my questions lol?

    6. #26
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      The problem I see with a TT Maverick is, lack of engine room, and lack of room for wide tires. You can overcome the problems with engineering and money but it will cost more money, a lot more.

      I got into a deal long ago with a V8 Vega, when we were done adding 12bolt rear and upgrading every component including a Camaro gas tank to replace the tiny Vega one during the 1978 gas shortage, the car weighed 3000 lbs and we still were fighting the small wheel sizes we were limited to. We could have done a Camaro and added some lightweight components to get the weight down and been far better off. If you want to save money go with a Camaro, Firebird, or Mustang.
      David
      Last edited by David Pozzi; 01-09-2009 at 10:54 AM.
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.

    7. #27
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Staten Island, New York
      Posts
      367
      Country Flag: United States
      any pictures and casting numbers ....... yet ..

    8. #28
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      213
      I just got a 93 gt thats in mint condition and its only got 21000 miles on it...I was going to sell it to further fund w/e project I got myself into...should I just dump what money I have into that? The guy that had it before me set it up for drag racing, it has over 10,000 in just suspension and tranny alone he through in the torque converter and supercharger headers (dont know if that what they are called he told me they were but I've never actually heard them called that)so really the only thing i need is a motor for it Im selling my 64 1/2 stang which ill prolly post on here soon but my budget for the motor is looking like 6g's and I'll scoop up some nice rims and tires along the way. I'll get some pics of it up tomorrow, it also has the t-rex fuel pump msd ignition and high torque starter like I said all i need is a motor

    9. #29
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      213
      302 or 351 i cant decide...does one have an advantage over the other?

    10. #30
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Southern Indiana
      Posts
      4,709
      Country Flag: United States
      351 has taller deck, gives better rod to stroke ratio. Heads are much better on 351 and besides nothing beats cubic inches and the 351 can be stroked very easy. http://www.ohiocrank.com/ford_rotate.html

    11. #31
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      Lake Ontario, NY
      Posts
      1,500
      Unless you'd want to save weight wherever possible, I'd agree on the 351.

      By the way, where are you located?
      Skip

    12. #32
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Posts
      213
      New Jersey...the only reason I was stuck on the 302 is because I have these 1200$ headers he gave me that were for the 331 he previously built I wasnt sure if theyd match up to 351 heads...and yea I have the casting numbers on the block I just gotta find the 3x5 card I put it on lol and as soon as the block comes back from the machine shop Ill get pics up

    13. #33
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      middle Georgia
      Posts
      325
      cant you drill and tap any two bolt main block to make it a 4 bolt?
      -Gibson-

    14. #34
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      Lake Ontario, NY
      Posts
      1,500
      Quote Originally Posted by Steeevooo View Post
      New Jersey...the only reason I was stuck on the 302 is because I have these 1200$ headers he gave me that were for the 331 he previously built I wasnt sure if theyd match up to 351 heads...and yea I have the casting numbers on the block I just gotta find the 3x5 card I put it on lol and as soon as the block comes back from the machine shop Ill get pics up
      Those headers should fit fine.
      Skip

    15. #35
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      Out of the Burbs of Detroit to SoCal, then onto my ancestral homeland, the woods of Cascadia
      Posts
      1,753
      Country Flag: United States
      Be careful about saying that. The deck is taller on a 351, and may drive the header tubes into the bellhousing
      Greg Fast
      (yes, the last name is spelled correctly)

      1970 Camaro RS Clone
      1984 el Camino
      1973 MGB vintage E/Prod race car
      (Soon to be an SCCA H/Prod limited prep)

    16. #36
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      Lake Ontario, NY
      Posts
      1,500
      Quote Originally Posted by Steeevooo View Post
      ...the only reason I was stuck on the 302 is because I have these 1200$ headers he gave me that were for the 331 he previously built I wasnt sure if theyd match up to 351 heads...
      I answered his question, they will match up with the heads he puts on the proposed 351 since he could use the same style head that were on the 331 that came out of the GT he purchased. Of course we don't know if the header diameter is appropriate for the 351 he might get. Only Steeevooo and/or the engine builder can determine that obviously.

      I agree of course there is no way of telling if they will fit in his car, or not fit his car, if he goes to the taller 351 until he mocks it up.
      Skip

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com