Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 9 of 9
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Henderson, NV
      Posts
      218

      Suspension Geometry Suggestions

      Below is the initial design of the front suspension for WSS. The fixed components are the spindle and the tire. It is a typical upper a-arm with a strut lower. I an looking for any input thus far until I can get my hands on something like performance trends to check roll center migration. Let me know what you think since this is my first complete scratch design of this type. I included the camber measurements for three static instances. Thanks



      Shane Wagner
      1970 Chevelle "Cholula"
      2010 Camaro "Proven1"


    2. #2
      dennis68 Guest
      At first glance right away camber gain sticks out as a problem. Less than a degree of gain per inch is pretty weak. It would be interesting to see on an analyzer.

      Tell Tyler to step-up and buy his new engineer some software (even if it is for personal use).

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2004
      Location
      Mid-Michigan
      Posts
      2,764
      Country Flag: United States
      Just looking at dimensions isn't going to prove out your design. You need to get P-T's Analyzer program and plug all of the numbers into it. You can get it as a 9 day trial. That's how I designed the suspension for BAD AST with a ton of help from Salt Racer. I finally broke down and bought the program a couple of weeks ago just so I can rerun my numbers and double check everything AGAIN...
      Bumpsteer, Roll, Anti-dive, Caster & Camber gain, even shock placement and inclination angles are all part of the design. You have a start but drawing it 2D is just the tip of the 'burg. I redesigned my entire suspension in 3D 5 times before I was happy with it. I also have the ability to cycle the components through Jounce and Rebound and Full Left/Right steer to check component clearances. Lots of things to think about when you're designing a complete suspension from scratch... Scrub Radius, Ackerman, Roll Center Migration, etc., etc.
      Just keep it fun.
      Mark
      Mark:
      "Bad Ast" Astro Van. Just because I did it... Doesn't mean it's possible...
      This my Bad Ast thread...
      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...roject-Faze-II
      This is my Fotki album...
      http://astroracer.fotki.com/

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Henderson, NV
      Posts
      218
      Thanks guys thats what I thought, but I was just excited that I got a start on it. I thought the camber curve was a little weak too, but I did get -.89 at 1" and another -1.12 at 2" with the static set at -1*. Just thought I'd share what I got so far in case something looked really wack out of place. Mark, I planned on doing the same thing in modeling the entire frame and suspension with motor, etc. to check clearances. I already pretty much have a lot of the frame done. Now its come down to getting the P-T software. So the initial RCH and SVSA look pretty typical? How about the scrub? I could get less, but I decided against running an excessive backspace and I'm kinda stuck with the 8* KPI. Other than that, back to the drawing board for more fun. These numbers where the very first I tried so I have a lot of experimenting to do. What's a good approach for setting anti-dive? I think I have a good handle on the bumpsteer and shock placement, but I'll post that later. Thanks again for your input.
      Shane Wagner
      1970 Chevelle "Cholula"
      2010 Camaro "Proven1"

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      CA
      Posts
      452
      Like others have said, have Tyler gets you the software as soon as possible.

      Camber curve is fine. You have to look at the overall picture. Shortening FVSA is not the only way to gain camber while cornering. Don't forget you'll lose traction under braking as you increase camber gain via altering FVSA. I will let you figure out how to go around this. You will have to design suspension for ATS sooner or later - trying to figure out how suspension works in your own head will make you a better engineer in the end.

      Reduce scrub radius to less than 0.75". With 13" wide tires, you'll hate yourself otherwise.

      Unless you're widening the fenders, 75" won't give you much steering angle at the ride height you're shooting for. Don't assume anything - mock up the car at the height you want, then measure until you're totally comfortable.
      The first step of becoming a better driver is to attend a track event, time yourself, and realize the fact you really suck.

      Signed,
      A driver who laps Big Willow at 1:42.6 in a 134hp BMW - and I am still considered mediocre.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Alta Loma,SoCal
      Posts
      396
      Could I get a suggestion on a book to learn more about all the different terms and characteristics about suspensions. From suggestions abouve, i bought PT Analyzer to design my sandrail suspension. Since i am looking at over 20" of wheel travel, there is alot to be concerned with. I know the basics(bump steer, camber curves, etc) but need to learn more about instant center migration, caster changes, anti dive, etc.
      Thanks.
      Phil
      1965 Buick Skylark

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Alta Loma,SoCal
      Posts
      396
      Quote Originally Posted by TurboLark
      Could I get a suggestion on a book to learn more about all the different terms and characteristics about suspensions. From suggestions abouve, i bought PT Analyzer to design my sandrail suspension. Since i am looking at over 20" of wheel travel, there is alot to be concerned with. I know the basics(bump steer, camber curves, etc) but need to learn more about instant center migration, caster changes, anti dive, etc.
      Thanks.
      Phil
      Noone with info?
      1965 Buick Skylark

    8. #8
      dennis68 Guest
      Herb Adams or Steve Smith. They are both good, easy to read authors. There are several others once you have a grasp on the basics. Fred Puhn and Miliken are very good but very technical reads.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Mar 2004
      Location
      Mid-Michigan
      Posts
      2,764
      Country Flag: United States
      Mark:
      "Bad Ast" Astro Van. Just because I did it... Doesn't mean it's possible...
      This my Bad Ast thread...
      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...roject-Faze-II
      This is my Fotki album...
      http://astroracer.fotki.com/




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com