Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 4 of 4
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Newark DE
      Posts
      238
      Country Flag: United States

      Another Watt's question

      I have found a few variations in the mounting of the bellcrank and the links but can't find anything regarding the affects. I know the most common setup is to have the bellcrank plumb and the links level at ride height but in my application it would be easier to mount it like the pic below. It is a frame mounted bellcrank. Is there anything wrong with this setup? Will it have any adverse affects?

      sorry for the big pics



      And since I'm here some pics of the bellcrank I fabbed up....







    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      194
      It just changes the bias between the amount of bump and rebound travel you have before it binds.

      If it was layed out as it's most commonly set up, you would be able to move the suspension up or down an equal amount from normal ride height before the links kept the suspension from moving.

      As it's layed out now, you have a short amount of bump travel and a large amount of rebound travel.
      If you turned the bellcrank 90 degrees clockwise, and adjusted the lengths of the links accordingly, the axle would be able to move up more, at the expense of how far it could move down.

      If the suspension travel is limited before you hit either point, it shouldn't matter.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Posts
      148
      i think you get more moment on the bellcrank but im not sure

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Newark DE
      Posts
      238
      Country Flag: United States
      Looking at the first pic I'm going to mount the bellcrank plumb but would still like to keep the arms as described.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com