Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 16 of 16

    Thread: '08 Vette

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      2,670
      Country Flag: United States

      '08 Vette

      Can anyone tell me if the '08 Vettes require 93 octane or can they safely run on 87? Thanks.

      Herb

      1966 El Camino LS408/T56Magnum
      1966 Chevelle 509/T56Magnum
      1963 C10 454/4L80

      PHR CHP CHP youtube



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      599
      If you're referring to the LS3, then yes they can run on 87 octane just like the LS2's. I don't run 87 in mine, but I do know quite a few people that do without any knocking. The computer makes the appropriate corrections. If you had to run 93 most people in CA would be in trouble...hard to find something over 91 out here.
      Last edited by Boesch; 04-15-2008 at 02:52 PM.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      599
      From the 08 Owners Manual located here:
      https://www.mygmlink.com/pdf/go2cont...08corvette.pdf

      Gasoline Octane
      If your vehicle has the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code W),
      use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted
      octane rating of 91 or higher. You can also use regular
      unleaded gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, but
      your vehicle’s acceleration could be slightly reduced,
      and you might notice a slight audible knocking
      noise, commonly referred to as spark knock. If the
      octane is less than 87, you might notice a heavy
      knocking noise when you drive. If this occurs, use a
      gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as
      possible. Otherwise, you could damage the engine. If
      you are using gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher and
      you hear heavy knocking, the engine needs service.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2007
      Location
      Houston, Tx
      Posts
      2,200
      Country Flag: United States
      if possible, on a car like that, go with the highest octan rating you can, it will be worth it if you keep the car for a while
      Colin Russ

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      San Diego, CA
      Posts
      599
      Quote Originally Posted by Young Gun
      if possible, on a car like that, go with the highest octan rating you can, it will be worth it if you keep the car for a while
      Strongly agreed.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2003
      Location
      Houston, TX
      Posts
      3,446
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm not really seeing the logic of spending $40K+ on a new Corvette and then trying to save $0.30 a gallon on gas. lol
      Co-Founder, LS1TECH.com


      Forged Wheel Dealer, Contact me for a quote!
      www.DV8Motoring.com

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      Atlanta, GA
      Posts
      227
      Agreed - dont be cheap and screw up your vette. Do the right thing.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      2,670
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for the info... btw, I don't own one, I was just curious.
      Herb

      1966 El Camino LS408/T56Magnum
      1966 Chevelle 509/T56Magnum
      1963 C10 454/4L80

      PHR CHP CHP youtube


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      north central Iowa
      Posts
      503
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Nine Ball
      I'm not really seeing the logic of spending $40K+ on a new Corvette and then trying to save $0.30 a gallon on gas. lol
      exactly, at the BMW dealer I work at we constantly have people coming in with their 80K 7's and 5's with the v8 and complain of a rough idle wich is caused by an excessive buildup of carbon on the valves and pistons due to running 87 octane gas and then they get mad when we try to sell them a top engine decarb service. even though it says premium 91 octane fuel is required.

      to put into perspective on a 25 gallon tank at 30 cents a gallon savings that is $7.50
      72 Nova SS, on the back burner for now.


      current cruiser: "The green machine"

      '70 Impala 4drht, 26K original miles, 2" drop springs and large swaybars, drives pretty good for a land yahct in the middle of an ls1 swap, but thinking about changing directions to a duramax diesel swap.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Macon, Ga.
      Posts
      8,085
      Country Flag: United States
      I run premium in mine. Not worth the risk to me to use regular.
      Bill

      Trailers are for BOATS!

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      How do you correlate carbon buildup to low octane fuel?

      Quote Originally Posted by justanova
      exactly, at the BMW dealer I work at we constantly have people coming in with their 80K 7's and 5's with the v8 and complain of a rough idle wich is caused by an excessive buildup of carbon on the valves and pistons due to running 87 octane gas and then they get mad when we try to sell them a top engine decarb service. even though it says premium 91 octane fuel is required.

      to put into perspective on a 25 gallon tank at 30 cents a gallon savings that is $7.50

    12. #12
      Join Date
      May 2007
      Location
      Houston, Tx
      Posts
      2,200
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Fuelie Fan
      How do you correlate carbon buildup to low octane fuel?
      Im assuming hes talking about the fact that with 87 octane there is not as complete a combustion as 91 or 93 octane. Since gas is a hydrocarbon, when the reaction does not go as far to completetion with a lower octane gas, the hydrogen bonds break thus leaving unbonded carbon molecules which over time build up. We arent talking about whole chunks of coal, but when a residue builds up, your engine will get jacked up badddd. But again, this is me just throwing assumptions around.
      Colin Russ

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      north central Iowa
      Posts
      503
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Young Gun
      Im assuming hes talking about the fact that with 87 octane there is not as complete a combustion as 91 or 93 octane. Since gas is a hydrocarbon, when the reaction does not go as far to completetion with a lower octane gas, the hydrogen bonds break thus leaving unbonded carbon molecules which over time build up. We arent talking about whole chunks of coal, but when a residue builds up, your engine will get jacked up badddd. But again, this is me just throwing assumptions around.
      Sounds like a pretty good explanation to me, I am no engineer or anything but when our v8's that use "Valvetronic" (variable valve lift to control engine (not a throttle body) speed, any carbon buildup causes the engine to surge at idle, like a rolling idle. The fix that was devised by the bmw engineers to fix this idle problem has been using the top engine decarb (the stuff we use is re-labeled GM stuff) and surprisingly it works. We do on occasion get cars that the owners actually run the premium fuel that will do it but not usually with the "top tier" rated gasoline from QT,Chevron etc.... The cars we most commonly see with this problem are when the customer admits to using low grade 87 gas. sometimes if we catch it soon enough we tell the customers to switch to 91 gas from QT/Chevron and it will clear up without using the decarb procedure.

      on another note, I have had some of these engines with enough carbon buildup on top of the piston that it was actually hitting the head causing the piston to rock in the bore and put the cyl. out-of-round and a bad knockin/piston slap was noticed at idle under load. needless to say that car got the engine replaced.
      72 Nova SS, on the back burner for now.


      current cruiser: "The green machine"

      '70 Impala 4drht, 26K original miles, 2" drop springs and large swaybars, drives pretty good for a land yahct in the middle of an ls1 swap, but thinking about changing directions to a duramax diesel swap.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      I strongly question your use of the word "fact" in that statement

      Quote Originally Posted by Young Gun
      Im assuming hes talking about the fact that with 87 octane there is not as complete a combustion as 91 or 93 octane. Since gas is a hydrocarbon, when the reaction does not go as far to completetion with a lower octane gas, the hydrogen bonds break thus leaving unbonded carbon molecules which over time build up. We arent talking about whole chunks of coal, but when a residue builds up, your engine will get jacked up badddd. But again, this is me just throwing assumptions around.

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      Quick searching found as many people postulating exactly the opposite: that high octane produced more carbon. I think the bigger problem is the cheap gas, and octane rating is not the culprit at all. The cheaper brands don't usually have as many additives as the higher brands, additives that perform such functions as preventing carbon buildup. Now, the same people shopping for cheap gas may ALSO be shopping low octane, and for the same reason (save money). But, chevron or mobil 87 may in fact produce less carbon buildup than say Valero's 91.

      Here's a good read if you want to gain an understanding of (relatively, I think this article may be up to 10 years old) modern fuel formulations

      http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part1/



      Quote Originally Posted by justanova
      Sounds like a pretty good explanation to me, I am no engineer or anything but when our v8's that use "Valvetronic" (variable valve lift to control engine (not a throttle body) speed, any carbon buildup causes the engine to surge at idle, like a rolling idle. The fix that was devised by the bmw engineers to fix this idle problem has been using the top engine decarb (the stuff we use is re-labeled GM stuff) and surprisingly it works. We do on occasion get cars that the owners actually run the premium fuel that will do it but not usually with the "top tier" rated gasoline from QT,Chevron etc.... The cars we most commonly see with this problem are when the customer admits to using low grade 87 gas. sometimes if we catch it soon enough we tell the customers to switch to 91 gas from QT/Chevron and it will clear up without using the decarb procedure.

      on another note, I have had some of these engines with enough carbon buildup on top of the piston that it was actually hitting the head causing the piston to rock in the bore and put the cyl. out-of-round and a bad knockin/piston slap was noticed at idle under load. needless to say that car got the engine replaced.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Chicago
      Posts
      355
      Country Flag: United States
      Octane ratings are a rating of the fuels traits not qualities. If you were to compare 87 octane and 91 octane from the same company, say Mobil for example, the 87 octane is NOT a crappy counterpart. The 87 octane fuel has a lower resistance to heat and pressure without a source of ignition. Cylinder heat and pressure are the only things that dictate your needed octane rating. Using 87 octane on an engine with 13:1 compression will cause the fuel to ignite long before the spark plug fires because the pressure and heat will cause it to ignite much like a diesel. This is where a higher octane fuel is needed to withstand the cylinder pressure. An engine with 9:1 compression can happily run on quality 87 it's entire life. The higher the octane number the more heat and pressure a fuel can withstand before bursting.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com