Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States

      Brand new question: Delrin bushing clearance

      I'm making my own Delrin bushings for my swaybar, and I wondered if anybody had any thoughts on clearance between the bushing and the swaybar. I made it about .005", but I'm starting to think that might be too loose. It's got a grease fitting, so grease can take up some of the clearance.

      Thoughts?

      jp

      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      Did you make it in two halves?...I'm guessing that you did.

      I don't think 5 thou is alot of play in a sway bar bushing...that is got to be better than the softer bushings that would squish a lot more than than.....and like you stated, the grease will eat up some of that clearance.

      Will you be mass producing these or is this just for your personal ride?
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      No... just one piece. I couldn't come up with an easy way to keep the bushing from walking out out of housing, so I made 'em one piece with a shoulder. That and a shaft retainer on the sway bar will keep them where they are supposed to be.

      These are custom pieces for II Much. I'm replacing the original bearings that had poor clearances and that I forgot to grease, so they had gotten real squeaky.

      jp
      Last edited by parsonsj; 03-07-2008 at 05:35 AM.
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj
      No... just one piece. I couldn't come up with an easy way to keep the bushing from walking out out of housing, so I made 'em one piece with a shoulder. That and a shaft retainer on the sway bar will keep them where they are supposed to be.
      Short dowels? to keep the two halves interlocked as one piece?...just a wild thought
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      Is the housing design such that it will crush the bushing at all? Is the diameter of the bar consistent across the load zone?

      You may also want to consider putting is either a spiral or raidal bore groove to act as a grease reservoir.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      The housing is a .002 interference fit with the bushing. It presses together by hand (6" vise). I did put a grease reservoir in. Spiral grooves are out of the question for my li'l workshop.

      But you guys think .005 clearance is OK, eh?

      jp
      Last edited by parsonsj; 03-07-2008 at 08:03 AM.
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Five would be OK since you are using grease to keep it lubed, and that will take up some slop. I'd shoot for .003 to .005.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Dec 2002
      Location
      Lost Wages, Nevada
      Posts
      2,683
      Country Flag: United States
      First of all... which composition of POM are we talking about ??

      0.002" might be enough... and, it might not be enough. It depends on the required surface work hardness that you are looking for. I played around with some staybar frame bushings a few years ago and found that even a 0.001" change made a big difference. When it was too loose... it actually deformed the surface of the bar... and when it was within its window of happiness, both the bushing and the bar showed zero deformation. From there it was just making sure that it didnt get too hot so that creep and relaxation were not the next issue.

      Here is a link that you may find helpful when selecting a product for specific mechanical properties: http://plastics.dupont.com/plastics/...in/230323c.pdf

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      So here's the tech sheet from McMaster-Carr:

      Material Acetal
      Acetal Material Delrin
      Backing Plain Back
      Opaque Black
      Operating Temperature Range -40° to +185° F
      Performance Characteristic High Tensile Strength
      Tensile Strength 10,000 psi
      Impact Strength 2.3 ft.-lbs./in.
      Tolerance Standard
      Hardness Rockwell M: 94
      UL Rating UL 94HB

      I'll have a read at the link... thanks!

      jp
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      It seems I'm using Delrin 100, 500, or 900.

      Anyway, everything's put back together. Gone are the original squeaky (and rusty) bearings. The greased Delrin bushings feel awesome when actuating the sway bar by hand. The one downside is that the bushing housing alignment is crucial (the old bearings were spherical, so alignment wasn't that important). Good thing they are adjustable.

      I need to re-scale the car since I was also messing with the end link lengths.

      I'm looking forward to a squeak-free ride now!

      jp
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      I just took the car for a long drive.

      What a difference! The old squeak is gone, and the suspension response is so much smoother and quieter.

      I should have done this a year ago.

      jp
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj
      What a difference! .....
      I should have done this a year ago.

      jp
      Cool!...Sounds like a successful project!
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com