Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 30
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Posts
      10

      Six piston or Four piston Wilwoods?

      Hi everyone, I'm over from Team Camaro.

      You guys are the experts. I ordered the 12.2" Dynalites 4 piston front/rear. Now after reading 100's of posts and my head about ready to explode, I'm having second thoughts.

      Should I go with the 6 piston Superlite on the 12.2 for the front for an additional $400? (Funny the reason I went with Wilwood over Baer was because of $$$$)

      Is it that big a difference? I will be street driving this car, but maybe some day Ill take it to a track, for fun, a couple times.

      Thx for your imput. Chad



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      I think the (6) piston 12.2" set up is the coolest thing to hit the brake market in a while. No 17" wheel clearance issues, and all the bling and increased stopping power.

      We can upgrade the calipers. If it were me I would.

      Also, I am buying a bulk of those calipers and will be doing a special on the (6) piston upgrade in a couple days.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      I'd do it. $400 isn't too bad, and if you are going to splurge on something, do it on brakes. You just can't go wrong.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Evansville, IN
      Posts
      106
      Another option: you could put you a DIY style Hydroboost on there and get all the stopping power you need. Unless you just "want" 6 pistons. You don't have to buy the high dollar kit if you don't mind doing a little fab work to the bracket. I put Hydroboost on my ride for about $135 or so. $75 for the J/Y unit, $40 for new lines from a 81 Toronado Diesel, free PS pump with late model O-ring style pressure outlet, plus some incidentals. I also added a late model steering box with O-ring connections (quick ratio).

      I don't know Wilwood's line in and out, but I would verify that total piston area actually increases with the 6 piston over the 4. If not, then I don't think it would be worth it to upgrade for the extra $ involved.
      68 Camaro, 406, T-56, Hydroboost, IROC box, SC&C Stage1+, Hotchkis front springs and bar, Speedway Engr. rear bar, Varishocks all 4's, Vintage WW V48's
      48 Ford F-1 pickup, 355, 700R4

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Oregon
      Posts
      1,773
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by hotrodf1
      ...I don't know Wilwood's line in and out, but I would verify that total piston area actually increases with the 6 piston over the 4. If not, then I don't think it would be worth it to upgrade for the extra $ involved.
      FYI, most big-brake kits increase the number of pistons and reduce the piston area to improve driver feedback through better force distribution across a larger pad...hence the multiple pistons. Aside from shrouding a larger portion of the rotor (especially in a 12.2" application), the larger pad volume will take more punishment and last longer than a comparable setup with smaller pads.

      If you don't upgrade to the 6-pistons now, you'll probably regret it later...otherwise you wouldn't be asking the question. I'd take Frank up on his deal when it becomes available.

      Tobin
      KORE3
      It's what I does.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Posts
      10
      Talked to Mike at Wilwood. He didnt think the 6 piston would necessarily stop any better then the 4 piston, it will stop the same for longer. (Hard aggressive driving and ocasional lap or 2 around a track)

      He was very helpful and honest. Wasnt trying to upsale. Wasnt saying these are track brakes for 1/2 hour runs, just that they would be fine for more than pure street driving.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      I agree, but they look cool! The Dynalite (4) piston caliper is plenty capable of the job.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Ok...this is one area that unfortunately I spent way too much time in.

      You would think the SL6 6 piston calipers have more piston area. Not true with this caliper. The SL4 caliper is the same casting and same pad as the SL6 except 2 less and bigger pistons. (SL6 8.05 piston area vs SL4 10.36)One reason Wilwood went to this 6 piston is to reduce pad taper. (why they used less piston area is beyond me. needs a lot of pressure to make them work) space avail issues?
      I found this out the hard way.

      If you are using the hydroboost system then I doubt it will be an issue. With straight manual master cylinders, I needed to run 3/4" and an 8:1 pedal ratio to make it work. (1200+ psi) Don't try to stop fast with cold BP20's. Need to heat them up first. (3600# car) Will push 100#'s on the pedal easy and will not lock-up wheels. Once hot (500+ degs) not as much pedal pressure is required. ~50-75#'s to lock-up wheels.

      I will be selling my SL6's here very soon and jumping up to the GNIII's 6 piston. 1 1/4" longer pad with a lot more piston area. (10.90) mega clamping force. Used in road race application. Not a whole lot more then SL4's but gives more pad area which I like. I will also still use my 3/4" MC set-up and hopefully get back to a reasonable 6:1 pedal ratio as well as trying the BP-10 pads instead. They have a little better low temp friction then the BP20's. I'll step up to the 'E' Pads for the track. I like to go thru the windshield when I hit the brakes.

      Lesson learned: SL4 is better then the SL6 with stopping power (clamping force with the same inlet pressure). They can trash the SL6's for all I'm concerned..Sorry Wilwood
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Evansville, IN
      Posts
      106
      Quote Originally Posted by ronracer
      Ok...this is one area that unfortunately I spent way too much time in.

      You would think the SL6 6 piston calipers have more piston area. Not true with this caliper. The SL4 caliper is the same casting and same pad as the SL6 except 2 less and bigger pistons. (SL6 8.05 piston area vs SL4 10.36)One reason Wilwood went to this 6 piston is to reduce pad taper. (why they used less piston area is beyond me. needs a lot of pressure to make them work) space avail issues?
      I found this out the hard way.

      If you are using the hydroboost system then I doubt it will be an issue. With straight manual master cylinders, I needed to run 3/4" and an 8:1 pedal ratio to make it work. (1200+ psi) Don't try to stop fast with cold BP20's. Need to heat them up first. (3600# car) Will push 100#'s on the pedal easy and will not lock-up wheels. Once hot (500+ degs) not as much pedal pressure is required. ~50-75#'s to lock-up wheels.

      I will be selling my SL6's here very soon and jumping up to the GNIII's 6 piston. 1 1/4" longer pad with a lot more piston area. (10.90) mega clamping force. Used in road race application. Not a whole lot more then SL4's but gives more pad area which I like. I will also still use my 3/4" MC set-up and hopefully get back to a reasonable 6:1 pedal ratio as well as trying the BP-10 pads instead. They have a little better low temp friction then the BP20's. I'll step up to the 'E' Pads for the track. I like to go thru the windshield when I hit the brakes.

      Lesson learned: SL4 is better then the SL6 with stopping power (clamping force with the same inlet pressure). They can trash the SL6's for all I'm concerned..Sorry Wilwood
      You confirmed my suspicion. . . .
      68 Camaro, 406, T-56, Hydroboost, IROC box, SC&C Stage1+, Hotchkis front springs and bar, Speedway Engr. rear bar, Varishocks all 4's, Vintage WW V48's
      48 Ford F-1 pickup, 355, 700R4

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Ron, my experience has been different. My car is equipped with Wilwoods SL6 on a 14" rotor up front and SL4s with 13" rotors in back. BP20's all around, just like yours.

      I'm also using Wilwood's balance bar system, which has a 6.25:1 pedal ratio. For the masters, I'm using 3/4" for the fronts and 13/16" for the rear. Overall balance of the car is near 50/50 and 3400lbs with driver and full fluids.

      While I wish the pedal ratio was closer to 7:1, brake feel, force, and modulation is excellent. I can hold the brakes VERY close to lockup conditions. But I do agree with the heat aspect, which is why I'm going to switch to a lower temp pad later, and possibly, a smaller rotor.

      But I do like a stiffer pedal in most cases. Just my opinion I suppose.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Corona, CA
      Posts
      681
      Im lost! I am getting ready to order brakes for my 69 and every time I read a post and change my mind on what set up to run. My issue is that I have never really heard anything all the great about the Wilwood 12.2" 4 pistons setup except it cheaper than Baer, it looks nice, and looks good on a stat sheet for a car. Now by the time you upgrade the Wilwood kits to include the 6 piston caliper and 13" drilled/slotted rotor the cost is up and you still need to worry about the performance. Am I missing something here?

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      If your brake system is assisted, you shouldn't have any problems with whatever kit you buy. Manual brakes is where opinions differ.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Corona, CA
      Posts
      681
      By assisted, are you referring to a hydro-boost setup or will these perform well with a normal brake booster/master set up.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      Quote Originally Posted by JButlr
      Now by the time you upgrade the Wilwood kits to include the 6 piston caliper and 13" drilled/slotted rotor the cost is up and you still need to worry about the performance. Am I missing something here?
      Now I am confused? What performance concerns are there with 13" (6) piston stuff? Tire and suspension performance are more of a concern, because there is cetainly enough brake there to challenge the tires / suspension.

      For that matter, on a street car, the 12.2" set up is more then enough brake. We probably have more experiance with these brakes then anyone here except possibly Matt = Art Morrison, and performance concerns have never been a issue.

      I do not think you can buy a 13" / 12" PBR Baer track kit in a Total Car type package for the same price as a our 13" / 12.2" (6) piston / (4) piston Total Car Brake Package (about $3000). And there both great brakes. But bling for the buck, Wilwood wins big! And also, the internal e brake system on Wilwood is far supieror to the caliper e brake on Baer and does not have the Clearance issues Baer has in mini tub applications.

      I personally think our Total Car Brake Package with the 12.2" / 12.2", (6) piston / (4) piston, in a Total Car Brake package for $2050 is super hard to beat in both braking and bling.

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by silver69camaro
      For the masters, I'm using 3/4" for the fronts and 13/16" for the rear. Overall balance of the car is near 50/50 and 3400lbs with driver and full fluids.

      While I wish the pedal ratio was closer to 7:1, brake feel, force, and modulation is excellent. I can hold the brakes VERY close to lockup conditions. But I do agree with the heat aspect, which is why I'm going to switch to a lower temp pad later, and possibly, a smaller rotor.

      But I do like a stiffer pedal in most cases. Just my opinion I suppose.
      I ran the clamping force numbers and the SL6's with the 3/4" MC is very close to the SL4's with the 13/16" MC. It probably works well with the 50/50 wieght dist you have. If you want more up front, change over to the SL4's. Or for all around, go up in the pedal ratio. I would like to keep the pedal ratio lower personally.
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms
      Now I am confused? What performance concerns are there with 13" (6) piston stuff? Tire and suspension performance are more of a concern, because there is cetainly enough brake there to challenge the tires / suspension.

      For that matter, on a street car, the 12.2" set up is more then enough brake. We probably have more experiance with these brakes then anyone here except possibly Matt = Art Morrison, and performance concerns have never been a issue.

      I do not think you can buy a 13" / 12" PBR Baer track kit in a Total Car type package for the same price as a our 13" / 12.2" (6) piston / (4) piston Total Car Brake Package (about $3000). And there both great brakes. But bling for the buck, Wilwood wins big! And also, the internal e brake system on Wilwood is far supieror to the caliper e brake on Baer and does not have the Clearance issues Baer has in mini tub applications.

      I personally think our Total Car Brake Package with the 12.2" / 12.2", (6) piston / (4) piston, in a Total Car Brake package for $2050 is super hard to beat in both braking and bling.
      I'm running 18x10's in the front with 275's. Lesser size wheels will most likely slip sooner.

      I live right next to Wilwood and took a visited. I had practically everybody in the parking lot. From the main man to the engineers. I did everything they said and still the same outcome. I finally took matters into my own hands and started a major investigation. My findings are as I write.

      I'm not saying Wilwoods shuff is bad, but I think people are getting the wrong impression that the SL6 being better. In my opinion, if you want a true 6 piston from Wilwood, step up to the GNII.
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Posts
      10
      Thx for everyone's imput...I know Baer vs Wilwood is a touchy subject.

      ronracer, I thx you for the explanation on 6 vs 4 in your experience. I think Mike at Wilwood was upfront about this. Just difference in opinion on if 6 will hold up longer, it appears. I dont think Ill ever have the type of car you do or the track time (sweet car by the way).

      Im looking for a good upgrade from my manual 4 wheel drums with 14x5 wheels. I bought 17x8 F/ 17x9 R and now looking for brakes that wont cost me $3000 (buying trans, rearend, engine, etc. I cant do the $1000-$2000 upgrade on every thing I get:(), but still work to my expectations.

      It appears some say 6 piston wont be better, others say it is worth the $400. I know there wont be 100% agreement on brakes from reading tons of "Which is better brake" posts.

      Ill let you know what I do and repost when I try them out.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,360
      Quote Originally Posted by ronracer

      I'm not saying Wilwoods shuff is bad, but I think people are getting the wrong impression that the SL6 being better.
      I agree, and I think that's the key here. But, Wilwood (to my knowledge) does not market the SL6 caliper as a true race caliper - they have others that fill that need. Does it work well? Sure it does, but it's more for a bling factor.

      I'd love to try the W6 calipers. Lots of piston area and uses 6617 pads.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by silver69camaro
      I agree, and I think that's the key here. But, Wilwood (to my knowledge) does not market the SL6 caliper as a true race caliper - they have others that fill that need. Does it work well? Sure it does, but it's more for a bling factor.

      I'd love to try the W6 calipers. Lots of piston area and uses 6617 pads.
      Yes I agree..the SL's are more a high end street caliper. If I were able to go back in time, I would have gotten the SL4's instead. That's why I think the SL6's should be dropped from the line-up. Go to one of the better 6 pistons. The W6 only shows 2 pads? (BP10 & BP20's). would still be better then the SL6's as long as you get the 1.75/1.38/1.38. The 1.62/1.12/1.12 is the same as the SL6 except with more pad area. If your going there..Get it all! and throw the 1.62's on the back...(in a 50/50 dist of course)

      I'm going to the GNIII's because its a direct bolt on to my 3.5" mounted SL6's. Same piston area as the W6. It also has all the Pads. Not as purdy however
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by cgrady
      Thx for everyone's imput...I know Baer vs Wilwood is a touchy subject.

      ronracer, I thx you for the explanation on 6 vs 4 in your experience. I think Mike at Wilwood was upfront about this. Just difference in opinion on if 6 will hold up longer, it appears. I dont think Ill ever have the type of car you do or the track time (sweet car by the way).

      Im looking for a good upgrade from my manual 4 wheel drums with 14x5 wheels. I bought 17x8 F/ 17x9 R and now looking for brakes that wont cost me $3000 (buying trans, rearend, engine, etc. I cant do the $1000-$2000 upgrade on every thing I get:(), but still work to my expectations.

      It appears some say 6 piston wont be better, others say it is worth the $400. I know there wont be 100% agreement on brakes from reading tons of "Which is better brake" posts.

      Ill let you know what I do and repost when I try them out.
      I think the SL4's would be the better upgrade for your ride. If you are bent on the SL6's. I would be more then happy to sell you mine for half the price of new ones. Comes with Q pads, Bp20's and E pads.

      Let me know if your intrested.
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com