Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      Cedar Rapids, IA
      Posts
      999

      Wide front tires on 1st Gen Fbody

      What is the limiting factor for a wider front tire on the 67-69 F-bodies? I know with the aftermarket frames you can run a 9inch rim and I have seen some A-arms that also help acomidate a larger wheel also. I was just wondering if there were any modifications that could be made to an exsisting frame like doing some notching to make a larger wheel fit.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Arvada, Co
      Posts
      2,119
      Country Flag: United States
      The frame and the back of the wheelhouse are the factors. CarlC was able to get 9.5 with a 275 on the front of his 68 using the stock frame and tubular uppers. He had to use steering stops. DSE was able to get 275s on the Twister with custom control arms and a one off spindle. If I were to invest the time and money, the way DSE did it would be the I would. You would also get the benifit of reduced scrub radius if you tuck the spindle further inside the wheel.

      Brian

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Suwanee, GA 30024
      Posts
      52
      Brent Jackon used s 18x9 wheel (5" back) on the front with a 265/35-18 tire. He also had a Steilow spindle with stock arms. I sure squeezing a 275 would not be a problem. That's what I will be running on my 69's when i get to that point.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      OKC, OK
      Posts
      3,739
      Country Flag: United States
      It is much easier to put wide tires on a 69 than a 67 or 68. There is another inch or two between the fender wells.

      Mike
      Mike Redpath
      Musclerodz & Customz
      405-288-0189
      pro-touring parts specialists
      Musclerodz.com

      facebook page
      http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Mus...73054649402015
      instagram
      Musclerodz

    5. #5
      Join Date
      May 2000
      Posts
      4,151
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by baz67
      The frame and the back of the wheelhouse are the factors. CarlC was able to get 9.5 with a 275 on the front of his 68 using the stock frame and tubular uppers. He had to use steering stops. DSE was able to get 275s on the Twister with custom control arms and a one off spindle. If I were to invest the time and money, the way DSE did it would be the I would. You would also get the benifit of reduced scrub radius if you tuck the spindle further inside the wheel.

      Brian
      Also, from what I remember reading about the Twister. Kyle moved the inner fender, upwards, to give the tire more clearance.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      Cedar Rapids, IA
      Posts
      999
      I'm not sure what is resonable. In my grand scheme of things I was thinking of a 17x9 with a 255 equivalant tire. 2-3inches lowered mini tubed in back with the 335mm tire on my 68 bird. I'm not concerned about the back since that has been done numerous times but it seem to be more of trick to get the front the way I would like it.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Posts
      186

      Notched front Subs

      Has anyone out there notched and reinforced the front subframe to allow clearance for wider tires?

      The 2 issues I can think of are:
      1) Needing a custom front sway bar with narrowed pivot points.
      2) Depending on how thick your reinforcements are to the inside of the subframe... possibly the the steering gear box and idler arm would be pushed inward... So, switch to a rack and pinion perhaps.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States

      notch

      I have in the past, its not really a notch, its more like lypo suction. Depending on the size tire you gonna run, it doesn't require more than an inch. Remember the only room you realistickly need is to do a hard u turn, turning it to lock sitting in you drive way is way past whats required. this also depends on your driving style.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Netherlands
      Posts
      1,012
      Quote Originally Posted by rohrt
      I'm not sure what is resonable. In my grand scheme of things I was thinking of a 17x9 with a 255 equivalant tire. 2-3inches lowered mini tubed in back with the 335mm tire on my 68 bird. I'm not concerned about the back since that has been done numerous times but it seem to be more of trick to get the front the way I would like it.
      ..........................rohrt im building a 68 bird as wel with the help of my mecanic who is "heavely" into trak raceing, he drives a 68 camaro against mercedes porche bmw and Rice burners as wel, and hes pretty competitife . a 2 inch overall drop with 17 x 8 x265 is as big as you whant to go infrond and 17x11x315 in the rear , anything bigger (rims and tire size) will only slow you douwn to mutch. 18 and 19 inch rims with 335/345 tires looks to be the BISENNIS , but when raceing and ore on the track is not practicel , . chek out some pictures on prodject updates (full metal jacket)

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      Cedar Rapids, IA
      Posts
      999
      David is yours the new green one added in Febuary?

      I wan't everything functional so your tip on 315 for the back is appreciated and it sounds like I should be good for a 17x8 with a 255 in the front.

      Hy mrQuick do you have any pictures of that notched front subframe?




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com