Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 23
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States

      Question about Engine Masters Challange....

      According to this guy on eBay...this engine has won the Challange the last 2 years. I haven't been paying much attention but has there been LS and L-series engines even involved in this contest? I don't remember reading about any. Unless he's talking about a different contest, but I read Engine Masters Challange as the one hosted by JEGS that PHR has been reporting on.

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/370ci...spagenameZWDVW
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Posts
      268
      i don't really follow EM, but i reckon he's talking about the engine builder, not the engine.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      He's saying that BES, who built the engine he is selling, has won Engine Masters.

      He is not saying that the engine he is selling won Engine Masters.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      Ahh, I see. Has anyone done an LS engine for that contest yet?
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      No, but with the Warhawk block out, ad since they do the Engine Master Dyno runs at World Products, I would look for one this year

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      No LSx engines are allowed in the EMC.. maybe in the future, but not now or in the past.
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      With the kind of power you can get out of these things, it's a wonder we haven't seen any yet.
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
      No LSx engines are allowed in the EMC.. maybe in the future, but not now or in the past.
      Whats with that crap?
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      For one, roller cams are no longer allowed.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      No LSX engines are allowed?

      That's classic.

      What the hell are they so afraid of? LOL!!!
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Coronado, CA
      Posts
      1,688
      Country Flag: United States
      Kind of like the Hemi being banned by NASCAR for being way too dominant. What gives?
      Johnny C.
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      70 'cuda, Pro-Charged 408 stroker, Tremec 5 speed, Strange S-60, Alter-k-tion, Tri 4, Hydroboost and Wilwoods

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      If Lsx was allowed they'd want to put a carb on it anyway.

      --JMarsa



    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Batesville, IN
      Posts
      908
      Country Flag: United States
      Not that it matters, but BES is about 2 miles from my house.

      OK - I'm out. Thanks for letting plop that useless piece of info out there - back to LSX engine discussion. I really didn't know that BES did much work on the LSX engines. Nice to know.

      Later,

      Brandon
      Brandon Wiedeman
      1972 Suburban
      1967 Chevy II - Project not yet started

      I have about 3 lifetimes worth of projects planned out in my head!
      Wiedo's

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Belle Plaine, MN
      Posts
      1,221
      Country Flag: United States
      When I originally wrote the rules, carbs and distributors were mandatory. So, LS engines could not be run.

      Simple.

      (When you're changing engines on the dyno every 30 minutes, simple is key. Have you ever been able to get an EFI engine hooked up to a dyno in less than 30 minutes?)

      ~SP~
      Scott Parkhurst


      2011 Car Craft Real Street Eliminator Winner

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      Nothing wrong with the KISS rule.

      If you had a requirement (read: standard) for sensors, fuel system (ex. returnless) and computer I don't see why it wouldn't be possible.

      --JMarsa

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Scott Parkhurst
      When I originally wrote the rules, carbs and distributors were mandatory. So, LS engines could not be run.

      Simple.

      (When you're changing engines on the dyno every 30 minutes, simple is key. Have you ever been able to get an EFI engine hooked up to a dyno in less than 30 minutes?)

      ~SP~
      Well now that you can run a Gen III with a carb, I don't see the need to disallow them any longer. Hopefully this rule will be changed in light of this. No Gen III engines is probably why I don't pay attention to Engine Masters Challange.
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Belle Plaine, MN
      Posts
      1,221
      Country Flag: United States
      The rules have been changed (at least a little) every year the Challenge has been run. I've got nothing to do with it anymore, but I'm confident those who are running it would love to have it open to more engine families. Variety is what makes it so interesting. The LS market is much more evolved than it was 5 yrs ago, and they hold the EMC at a new location.

      I'm sure that if they can do it, they will do it.

      If they can't do it yet, it won't be long before they can.

      It's not "fear" of LS engines, it's simply a matter of getting things connected and disconnected quickly.
      Scott Parkhurst


      2011 Car Craft Real Street Eliminator Winner

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      Ahh, I see. Thanks Scott.

      Wasn't this held one year at Impastato Racing in Michigan?
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Belle Plaine, MN
      Posts
      1,221
      Country Flag: United States
      Now it's all run at one facility. We used to have three regional "Qualifiers" and the top engines from each qualifying site would be shipped to a common location for the "Finals". It was a logistical headache. Vince Impastato's place was one of the Regional Qualifying locations one year (2003 I think). I was 'refereeing' at Vinces that year. He was great to work with and his facility was outstanding, which is why it was chosen in the first place.

      Once we located and secured a facility with three identical DTS dyno cells and enough room to host all of the entrants, we went with a single location for all the entrants. It was a big improvement. Still - running 40 or so engines in two days is a challenge, and then re-running the top few finalists again on the last day makes for a busy week- especially when the inevitable rules questions surface or there's anything out of the ordinary placed before you. Developing this series was, without question, some of the most difficult and rewarding work I've ever done. I'm proud of the results to this day, and whether people realize it or not, it is having a solid influence on the automotive aftermarket today. The EMC rocks.

      ~SP~
      Scott Parkhurst


      2011 Car Craft Real Street Eliminator Winner

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      Vince's shop is about a mile from my house here in Chesterfield. I've been up there to talk to him a few times. His place IS nice.
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com