Results 41 to 44 of 44
Thread: Fatman Spindles
-
03-04-2008 #41
New to Pro-Touring
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 8
Way to go CCrs! It's refreshing to see the good stuff spreading "out there".
-
03-04-2008 #42
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- St George Utah
- Posts
- 1,243
HUMMMMMMM i'm just going to sit here and read.
03-04-2008 #43
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts
- 450
Ok, so, I am running these spindles on my 69 nova and they work great, save for the limited wheel backspace. Being ignorant of geometry issues, I got a set for my 1969 chevelle as well, so I am up a creek now. Would it be possible to redesign the steering arm or is it how it mounts to the spindle that creats the geometry issue?
03-04-2008 #44
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Northern California
- Posts
- 10,716
Yes, it is how it is mounted to the spindle.
Originally Posted by carguy502
On a rear steer F/X body spindle, the tie rod has to go down the correct the bumpsteer issue inherent to the design.
On an A/B/G body or front steer application it is the opposite. In this the drop arm mount would not help decrease bumpsteer. So the the need for a special steering arm was required. ATS does sell the required arm. So all is not lost.MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε
Reply With Quote
