Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
    Results 21 to 36 of 36
    1. #21
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      292
      I was on the fence about it for a long long time, and finally when it came time for me to redo my rear suspension, I went for it. While I still have not actually gotten my car on the road yet, and I will not be able to afford bigger tires for a little while, I still honestly think that mini tubbing and 4 linking my car are my two favorite things done to it so far. nothing gives the car as much attitude as a low stance with huge tires.



    2. #22
      Join Date
      Feb 2003
      Location
      Houston, TX
      Posts
      3,446
      Country Flag: United States
      Minitubs are purely cosmetic for 99% of the cars they are installed on, on this site. Wide rear tires look cool, that is the reason most guys install the minitubs. You can get the same deep dish look if you just narrow the rear axle and reduce the backspacing on your custom wheels when you order them. Outward visuals would appear identical, only the rear shot would be a little different due to tire width.

      Here is a pic of my previous '69, it had a stock width axle and 17x10 wheels with a 5.5 backspace (Intro wheels). 275 wide tires. Most people asked me if it was minitubbed, it wasn't.



      It also didn't need them to get the job done, just a tire swap:



      You just need to ask yourself if the added expensive of the minitubs is worth it to you. Performance-wise, you can make a car handle damn good on the right 275 wide tires. Wider front tires would be more useful than having 345 wide rears. Not many people do mods to increase that front tire width beyond a 245 wide.
      Co-Founder, LS1TECH.com


      Forged Wheel Dealer, Contact me for a quote!
      www.DV8Motoring.com

    3. #23
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Northern Indiana
      Posts
      737


      It also didn't need them to get the job done, just a tire swap:




      Tony,
      Excellent points!
      That baby was the Swiss Army knife of the 1st gens.
      One of my favorites..
      Scott
      G Force Designs Concepts #004
      "Quicksilver"
      1965 Mustang Fastback
      347/450hp FRPP crate engine,G Force T5
      SSBC 4wdb,Budnik M5's etc...
      SOLD

      2011 GT500
      Ingot Silver Metallic
      Stripe delete
      SVTPP/Elec. Pkg.
      Stock for now
      SOLD

      70 Pro Touring Nova
      572/620ho crate
      TKO 600
      DSE suspension upgrades

      SOLD

    4. #24
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Lake Tillery NC
      Posts
      841
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for all of the advice. I have owned the car 23 years so resale value dosen't matter. The car will have to be pried out of my posession. I have built the car 3 times since my aquiring it in 85. Each time money and lack of a place to work on it kept me from what I call being happy with the end result. I have the killer garage and the funds, to acomplish my goal this time. I will do all the work myself. So I made up my mind to go all out. I have a 68 Camaro that I can at least drive, although it is rough it still turns heads. I will keep everybody posted on the progress. I knew the pro-touring group would cheer me on.

      Mike
      Michael Tucker
      Project "Trouble" 1969 Camaro DSE subframe, quadrilink, 13" wilwood brakes, Rated X Rushforths, LS2/T56
      1968 Camaro

    5. #25
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Calgary, Canada
      Posts
      662


      Cool Shot!! I would have guessed at first glance it was tubbed.
      Dave
      FUeL 69 Camaro RS BuilD by G-Force Design & Concept
      68 Corvair coupe
      65 Impala SS
      64 Corvair Rampside
      62 Corvair Greenbrier
      Asst. daily drivers

      http://www.sourceboards.com/

    6. #26
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      Massachusetts
      Posts
      220
      I mini tubbed for the first time....LOVE THE LOOK.....DSE kit was well worth the money for the factory look.
      Just go slow...double check before cutting...very simple
      I even watched the $25 dvd several times....Not as informative as you would hope, but good for the templates needed for the frame cut-outs
      CAN YOU BUILD PROTOUR ON A BUDGET?! NOT!
      Time isn't something you have!
      It's something you make!

    7. #27
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Santa Barbara, Ca
      Posts
      1,174
      Tony,
      Just makes me wonder what that '69 would have been capable of with a few more inches of rubber in back. Couldn't have hurt, that's for sure.

      I also agree that you need to get a decent size tire in front to match. I'm looking to do a 275 in the front to compliment the 335s that are going in the back. Although I do have an Art Morrison C5 sub that frees up room in the front.

      I still think the mini-tub is one of the coolest thing about my car, and with 600+ hp and a 6 speed it helps on the street.

      Andy

    8. #28
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      El Dorado Hills, CA
      Posts
      789
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by MrQuick
      If I only had a dollar for every time I heard "man, I should have tubbed it"...wait, I think I do. LOL

      That's me right there!!! I wish I would have mini-tubbed mine before paint.
      Brad
      68 Camaro - Procharged LQ4 coming - Currie 9" narrowed, bagged, lays frame, BMW projector HID's LED tails, 18"s, lexus center console, seat warmers, A/C... Mini-tubbing in progress!!

      07 BMW 750li -loaded

    9. #29
      Join Date
      Feb 2003
      Location
      Houston, TX
      Posts
      3,446
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by streetk14
      Tony,
      Just makes me wonder what that '69 would have been capable of with a few more inches of rubber in back. Couldn't have hurt, that's for sure.
      For drag racing, you only want as much tire size as you can use. If you can hook on smaller tires, your car will run quicker than it would on bigger tires. Bigger tires weigh more, and slow you down on the top end. Looking at that pic above, I wasn't having any traction issues with the 28x10.5 drag slick. What the car could have used was some 4.10 gears instead of 3.73s, that would have been better suited for the 1/4. I was finishing the run in the middle of 4th gear, my trap speeds suffered. But, I built that car to do the Power Tour in, so the 3.73s were nicer on the highway.
      Co-Founder, LS1TECH.com


      Forged Wheel Dealer, Contact me for a quote!
      www.DV8Motoring.com

    10. #30
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      SouthTX
      Posts
      1,233
      Country Flag: United States
      I would have mini tubbed my car if I could have fit a 275 or 285 tire up front. Since I have a stock subframe, I personally didn't go for it since I want the fronts to look larger than 245 to match the wide rear look a mini tub allows you to fit. 295 rears are good enough for me.

    11. #31
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Burnaby, BC, Canada
      Posts
      1,388
      Personally I would do it 100% if I were doing my project over again. (back then the DSE tub kit was not available) I think if you have your car torn down and are doing metal work, and are planning to replace or purchase a new rear-end, gas tank and suspension. Then I would do it in a heartbeat. It just looks so damn killer with some steamrollers out back. BTW I think SW's black '69 has 8" fronts with 245 tires. And his car looks freakin SICK!!
      1969 CAMARO RS

      2002 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 452 rwhp, 425 rwtq
      Project pics of my '69
      Lateral-G Feature Page
      Camaro Performers Magazine Feature

    12. #32
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Lake Tillery NC
      Posts
      841
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Rybar
      Personally I would do it 100% if I were doing my project over again. (back then the DSE tub kit was not available) I think if you have your car torn down and are doing metal work, and are planning to replace or purchase a new rear-end, gas tank and suspension. Then I would do it in a heartbeat. It just looks so damn killer with some steamrollers out back. BTW I think SW's black '69 has 8" fronts with 245 tires. And his car looks freakin SICK!!
      Your car looks so SIC without the tubs. I have my 69 torn almost completly apart. I just installed 4 new floorpans, DSE Firewall block off plate. I plan on installing DSE subframe connectors. The rest of the body is in good shape. I totaled it twice since I have owned it. The only original piece's is the top and tail panel and inner doors.

      Mike
      Michael Tucker
      Project "Trouble" 1969 Camaro DSE subframe, quadrilink, 13" wilwood brakes, Rated X Rushforths, LS2/T56
      1968 Camaro

    13. #33
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Burnaby, BC, Canada
      Posts
      1,388
      Thanks man, I still think if you have it torn down that far and are planing to buy a new tank and rear-end then tubbing is a no brainer. Trust me, you'll keep wanting or thinking of doing it if you don't. For me it's just too much to tear my whole car apart to gain that extra bit.
      1969 CAMARO RS

      2002 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 452 rwhp, 425 rwtq
      Project pics of my '69
      Lateral-G Feature Page
      Camaro Performers Magazine Feature

    14. #34
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Oregon
      Posts
      1,387
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by bretcopsey
      you could save some cash by going the route many did before the deep tubs were available, by splitting the factory tubs and welding in a strip of sheetmetal.
      This is what I had to do since I did mine long before the Deep Tubs were available. It doubles the man hours...but saves some cash. If I was to do it again today and had the cash I would just buy the DSE DT's.

      After seeing the first mock-up pic of The Mule I knew I was going to buy a welder and go for it!!
      Tony

    15. #35
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Springfield, Mo.
      Posts
      443
      I am in the "no tub club" at the moment, not because i dont like them, just because of the cost involved. I knew that if i was going to get my car on the road in under a decade i would have to make certain compromises for now, the tubs were one.... but i honestly dont feel too bad about it since i know that with a little bit of work a 275 (or even 285 according to some) can fit in stock tubs and with a good tire you should have good traction.

      As for the future, once the car is completed there will be several things that i re-visit and mini-tubs may be one.
      Wayne
      1967 Camaro - Done!
      1968 Camaro - Underway

    16. #36
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      King George VA
      Posts
      99

      Keep it up

      Quote Originally Posted by Tucks69
      Thanks for all of the advice. I have owned the car 23 years so resale value dosen't matter. The car will have to be pried out of my posession. I have built the car 3 times since my aquiring it in 85. Each time money and lack of a place to work on it kept me from what I call being happy with the end result. I have the killer garage and the funds, to acomplish my goal this time. I will do all the work myself. So I made up my mind to go all out. I have a 68 Camaro that I can at least drive, although it is rough it still turns heads. I will keep everybody posted on the progress. I knew the pro-touring group would cheer me on.

      Mike
      Keep it up I got mine in 1989 and have built it a couple of times myself. I have always just did to the car that I thought looked good. Half the people here will say they like something the other will say nicely that it sucks.

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com