Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 19 of 19
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Austin,Tx,
      Posts
      154

      Would you guys trade an Audi for a Range Rover?

      I've got an 98 Audi A6 that's my daily driver, and I recently drove a 98 Range Rover. I was pretty impressed the the Range Rover, has all sorts of bells and whistles. It got me thinking of getting rid of the Audi for the Range Rover but I don't know how reliable or expensive to maintain it will be. Do any of you guys have any input on the Range Rover's? And would you rather have it over an A6? Thanks



      Paul
      1969 RS Camaro
      1985 Buick GN
      2005 F-250


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
      Posts
      1,364
      Country Flag: Canada
      I like the looks of it. My uncle has an 03 and loves it.


      What my uncles looks like.


      Does the 98 have the lowering and raising feature(thinger)? Theres some that raise 5 inches+ for when you get high centered. Pretty trick!

      -Matt
      Matt
      72 Chevelle 370ci, 76mm single turbo, TKX, Speedtech Track Time, Millerbuilt Strange full floater 9", Brembo brakes, BC Forged 18x11s with 315s square
      Instagram: Cst_koon

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      North Jersey
      Posts
      983
      Paul, I think they are probably one of the most expensive vehicles to fix/maintain if something goes wrong. There's a shop near my house that used to have (no lie) 4 or 5 Range Rovers outside that have had engine fires. Seems like an awful lot, if you ask me! JMO of course, but I think you should stick with the Audi.
      Steve Ragusa - North Jersey
      2006 Infiniti G35x
      Former Build - 1988 Monte Carlo SS - ZZ4-cammed TPI 355, F-body serpentine conversion, World-Class 5-speed, Eibachs/Bilsteins, Howe tall LBJs, 34mm hollow front swaybar, 3/4" straight rear bar, 17" Coys C55s, 12" front discs, and more. Sold on 2/28/11.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Austin,Tx,
      Posts
      154
      Yeah the 98's have the adjustable suspension. That is a cool toy. Like I said, they have all sorts of bells and whistle's, it'll almost wipe your butt for you. But are they expensive to maintain and are they reliable? I also wonder how much gas they go through cause they feel really heavy and the one I drove felt sluggish even with the 4.6.

      Tpi Monte SS

      Thanks for the reply, I'm gonna have to look into that. That would suck if i got rid of a perfect car and bought one that is likely to burn itself down to the ground.
      1969 RS Camaro
      1985 Buick GN
      2005 F-250

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      Anaheim Hills, CA
      Posts
      11,967
      Country Flag: United States
      Arn't they british?

      There is an old joke that goes like this...

      Why don't the british make computers?

      Answer: Because they couldn't figure out how to make them leak oil...

      ;)

      As for the 98 I would research with JD Powers and Consumer Reports to see how thier owners rate them..
      "A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

      1968 Track Rat Camaro:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s

      1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Bayonne, NJ
      Posts
      10
      hey guys, here is my 2 cents, Range Rovers look cool, ride pretty good, have lots of toys. I finance cars for one of the largest auto finance companys in the country and we absolutly do not like giving loans for them, for 2 reasons. Repo rate is high because everytime the break, its $1500 to fix it and people don't pay the monthly payments. Another reason is think of this. New they are 50k. After 3 years you can get them at auction for $18 to $20k. the decrease of value is tremendous. My advise is stay away. I know a ton of people in the business and even the Land Rover dealers say they are a good car to lease for 3 years and give it back!! Just my 2 cents.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Southeastern WI
      Posts
      1,489
      Country Flag: United States

      Rover

      Trade the Audi for a Rover and I will recommend a good shrink for you to see. Transmissions as well as the suspensions are weak links. Get used to probably 12-14 mpg.

      I can substantiate Jay's statement about resale values, (I work for an auction company) although the product got better when BMW took them over, now they are owned by Jaguar (Ford), so time will tell. There are a lot of unknowns regarding long term quality. IMO you are better off with the A6.

      My $.02.

      Jeff
      Jeff

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Mar 2002
      Location
      Redwood City, CA
      Posts
      1,895,413,640
      Country Flag: United States
      Here's another one for keeping the A6. You've got a good car there. If you want a sport utility vehicle, go for the Lexus. It's a lot better than the Range Rover.
      Allen Ortega
      Meanstreets Performance Fabrication

      ---------------------------------------

      Vegetarians are the reason for global warming

    9. #9
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      A6 all the way...i'd rather have a 2002 S4 tho
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
      Posts
      1,364
      Country Flag: Canada
      I think the Land Rover is more for the person that digs them. You have to like them enough to put money into them. Just like guys that ride Harleys. You see Harleys with overheated or blown engines on the side of the road quite often in the hot mountains(I see them every year on the way to BC) Why do guys still ride them? Because they love the company enough to keep on putting money into them. Just like Land Rovers.

      Now before anyone jumps on me. Harley was just an easy example. We all know Chevy painted their engines orange to hide all the RTV Silicone. LOL

      -Matt
      Matt
      72 Chevelle 370ci, 76mm single turbo, TKX, Speedtech Track Time, Millerbuilt Strange full floater 9", Brembo brakes, BC Forged 18x11s with 315s square
      Instagram: Cst_koon

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Albuquerque, New Mexico
      Posts
      609
      Range rovers are awesome....

      ....if you like depreciation, and having to tear apart half the engine back to fix a part you invariably have to part with a kidney to pay for. Audi's at least have a strong enough aftermarket to keep that in check. Unless you are gonna trudge through mountainous regions, don't do it man.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The Netherlands
      Posts
      1,509
      Country Flag: Netherlands
      A6...nuff said
      1st 2nd
      Pro-Touring outside the USA !
      Martin's Camaro Page

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Austin,Tx,
      Posts
      154
      Thanks for all the input, I guess I'm gonna stick with the Audi. It's really comfortable but like Mr. Quick said I wish it was an S4. Thanks again
      1969 RS Camaro
      1985 Buick GN
      2005 F-250

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Albuquerque, New Mexico
      Posts
      609
      Which motor is in your a6? IIRC they came with a 2.8, which was really the same thing as the 2.7 in the s4. Since audis do have a wicked aftermarket, and that motor is really the same thing as the v6 a4 as well. So you can find a bunch of stuff about it. I'm also not sure what the difference is between the VW vr6 and the 2.8l in the a6, but I expect it to be relatively minor, and people are making good power on vr6 with a turbo setup.

      I don't know anything about the other motor, I think it was a v8, that was offered as well.

      Check out www.audiworld.com. They'll help you out, but you aren't without options.

      -Matt

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Atlanta, Ga.
      Posts
      108
      A-6 great little Hot Rod.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Austin,Tx,
      Posts
      154
      Yeah it has the 2.8 in it, I think it's rated at like 190hp. Pretty underpowered for that car I think but I can't complain about the ride comfort or reliability so far. I saw that some one makes a supercharger for them that adds about 95hp but it's like 5 grand. I rather sell it and buy an S4.
      1969 RS Camaro
      1985 Buick GN
      2005 F-250

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Albuquerque, New Mexico
      Posts
      609
      That's another option, s4's a great cars, lots of fun to drive. The seats suck for distances though, wickedly hard. Toys for S4's are ungodly expensive too.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jan 2002
      Location
      Italy
      Posts
      746
      Italy says: Trade A-6 for an RS-6 if you really want to trade.
      Hey there isnt much more crude oil out there, dont waste the rest driving a british car, let them make gas until the last drop of it.

      André

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Austin,Tx,
      Posts
      154
      Hey Andre, If you get me in with the Italian Mafia I might be able to get enough cash to get the RS6 I just went to Italy about 2 months ago, Awesome country! so much to see and do.
      1969 RS Camaro
      1985 Buick GN
      2005 F-250




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com