Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 31
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Seattle
      Posts
      35

      Rack and pinion conversion in chevelle

      In my quest to finish the design of my chassis, im trying to nail down the last little details. I want to run a power rack and pinion on my 64 wagon. So far, these are the known factors: ART A-arms w/shockwaves, Wilwood big brake conversion (most likely 12.2 rotors) And I plan on running a TPI 350 out of a late 80's IROC(for power steering pump fitment) Is there a conversion kit out there, (that I wont regret buying)???? lol...

      Tony

      1964 Chevelle 2dr Wagon.. Pro-Touring bound
      1967 Mercury Cougar (PT)


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      2,413
      Not sure why you would "have" to run a late 80s tpi motor just for power steering fitment.. I have a GM type II pump on my 406 circa 1972 motor.

      As for the Rack n pinion steering gear one of our sponcers offers a nice looking unit. http://www.unisteer.com/mm5/merchant...CHEVROLET+CHVL


      Ive seen the machine work involved and I must say its top notch if I dont say so myself/// LOL ...
      Nothing says "I built this" better than tool marks and dykem blue..

      Follow my 3 link build. https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=61592

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Seattle
      Posts
      35
      i dont have to..i just stated that so they new what motor i was running, in case the pumps on the kits were specific to engine type. I never said I HAD to run the TPI 350...thats just what i chose to run
      1964 Chevelle 2dr Wagon.. Pro-Touring bound
      1967 Mercury Cougar (PT)

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Pittsburgh, PA
      Posts
      125
      Anyone here actually do the Unisteer swap? I'm thinking about putting one in my LS1 powered 70 Nova and wondering if it's worth it, and how much aggravation is involved in the swap.
      Mark


      70 Nova, Hotchkis springs and sway bar GW uppers, Bilsteins, , sub connectors, Smooth firewall hidden wiper motor, LS1, 425 rwhp, 175 NOS Ridetech 4 link HQ Coilovers, Mini tubs, 315's. Ridetech billet gas cap, FLT level 5 4L60E, Yank

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Southern Indiana
      Posts
      4,709
      Country Flag: United States
      If I hand my choice UNLESS you have put in a Corvette front end give Tom a call at Lee Power steering and get price on a performance gear box. A lot less crap to go through and any pump that makes pressure will make any power steering unit be it box or rack function.
      [email protected]
      818-768-0371

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Seattle
      Posts
      35
      I just wanted to convert to a rack and pinion because I think it looks alot cleaner.... thats the underlying theme to my car ...clean and simple
      1964 Chevelle 2dr Wagon.. Pro-Touring bound
      1967 Mercury Cougar (PT)

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      26
      Wagonboy,
      Hi I run Unisteer, our kits come with a pump and bracket for your small bock....all bolts on. We have sold over 100 kits to date, no problems, no tech calls, only praise.
      Ive been part of this forum for a couple years now, and not to sound pissy, but everytime a rack kit is brought up Tom Lee is always brought up. How come? As far as I can see he's not even a advertiser. I know Tom, and he makes a good product, but why does MonzaRacer always make a point to tell guys looking for a rack kit that Lee is the way to go. Id be happy to put our kit up against any box. Put each on the track and see what the results are. Ive been doing steering for 17 years now and I can hostley tell you that the box set ups have twice the amount of pivot points, which lead to more play and play equalls slop. Plus boxes without a doubt wear out quicker than racks. There is a reason that all OEMs use racks in favor of boxes, they are more reliable, last longer, and are more responsive. Like I said I'll put our kit against any other, rack or box, on the track.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Orlando, Fl
      Posts
      1,229
      Country Flag: United States
      Nice to see a supplier chime in on this. I think I speak for many on here in saying that a well engineered R&P has the potential to outperform a steering box. However, the majority of the R&P retrofit kits suffer from contrived mounting bracketry and bumpsteer issues. I cannot speak for Unisteer set ups as I have no first hand experience. How do the Unisteer kits fare when it comes to bump steer??

      Quote Originally Posted by steeryourite
      Wagonboy,
      Hi I run Unisteer, our kits come with a pump and bracket for your small bock....all bolts on. We have sold over 100 kits to date, no problems, no tech calls, only praise.
      Ive been part of this forum for a couple years now, and not to sound pissy, but everytime a rack kit is brought up Tom Lee is always brought up. How come? As far as I can see he's not even a advertiser. I know Tom, and he makes a good product, but why does MonzaRacer always make a point to tell guys looking for a rack kit that Lee is the way to go. Id be happy to put our kit up against any box. Put each on the track and see what the results are. Ive been doing steering for 17 years now and I can hostley tell you that the box set ups have twice the amount of pivot points, which lead to more play and play equalls slop. Plus boxes without a doubt wear out quicker than racks. There is a reason that all OEMs use racks in favor of boxes, they are more reliable, last longer, and are more responsive. Like I said I'll put our kit against any other, rack or box, on the track.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      26
      dipren,
      Im glad I can contribute. Ohhhhh I agree that rack kits in the past and present have been cobbled up messes. We strictly adhere to reducing bump steer from the factory set up. The Chevelle kit we offer has
      .030 of tow out through its entire travel. Compressed
      .020, rebound.010. Thats a big impovement over factory set up. The key is to get the inner tie rods at the right height, and match the swing of the control arms. The A Body was difficult to engineer, but the result was unbelievable. Not to bash my competitor but(Flaming#@%$&^) there stuff is crap. I worked for them 10 yrs and know that they have no clue. Just ask them for bump steer specs, see what they say. Besides that their kits are down right scary. A thin wall bracket that hooks to a conventional rack holding the inner ends???? Its gotta twist. Have you ever seen an OE do that? Im just worried that someone will get hurt, and that will tarnish rack kits even more. BEWARE!!!! I work with many companies that are competetors(Total ConTrol, RRS, Randalls) and we all agree that FR's kits are not safe. Hope this info is usefull.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      La La Land, CA
      Posts
      2,241
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by steeryourite
      Wagonboy,
      Hi I run Unisteer, our kits come with a pump and bracket for your small bock....all bolts on. We have sold over 100 kits to date, no problems, no tech calls, only praise.
      Ive been part of this forum for a couple years now, and not to sound pissy, but everytime a rack kit is brought up Tom Lee is always brought up. How come? As far as I can see he's not even a advertiser. I know Tom, and he makes a good product, but why does MonzaRacer always make a point to tell guys looking for a rack kit that Lee is the way to go. Id be happy to put our kit up against any box. Put each on the track and see what the results are. Ive been doing steering for 17 years now and I can hostley tell you that the box set ups have twice the amount of pivot points, which lead to more play and play equalls slop. Plus boxes without a doubt wear out quicker than racks. There is a reason that all OEMs use racks in favor of boxes, they are more reliable, last longer, and are more responsive. Like I said I'll put our kit against any other, rack or box, on the track.
      I'm a Lee dealer, and I use his boxes exclusively. So I pay for Tom Lee to be on this site.

      That said, our 670 box will feel exactly like your R&P kit will, and will do it for almost $500 less. I'll take you up on the track offer. We can have clients get in each one and try to tell us which has a P/S box, and which one has a rack.
      I'm going to bet that without looking, no one can tell the difference in steering feel between the two. There are much better ways to spend $1000 than going to a rack on a stock frame.

      What happens when my client is on the Hot Rod Power Tour and they have a steering part fail? Do they have to come back to me for my proprietary items, or can they get it at any parts store? I like the fact that I know I can get a replacement part to my client 30 years from now since they are everywhere and not made by only one aftermarket company.

      Tyler
      Last edited by TitoJones; 01-24-2008 at 07:15 PM.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      26
      Tito,
      You get the car, I'll send the parts. As far as your coments about failure on the road, what parts are you refering to? Boxes need to have seals replaced, so do Racks. My kit uses factory seals. If your Lee sector or worm fails, there isnt a part store in the contry that have those. Our company have been rebuilding racks for 25 years, we are all former TRW guys and we can honestly tell you, gear boxes are more subseptible to failure than racks. Boxes have many more parts that can fail. Sector shaft are know to wear as are sector bushings, ball bearings, bearing cages, as well as valves. None of these would be able to be replaced on the road. Worst case for a rack is that a tie rod gets damaged. We only use low friction inner and outer ends which can have a life span of 50, 60, 70k miles. Plus all our kits have a lifetime warranty. How bout your boxes?
      How do you know that your box feels like a rack....have you tried ours...Ive tried the Lee box.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      26
      Oh....When Kyle Tucker and Detroit Speed designed there new front end for Camaros, why didnt he use the same 600 box that is supose to be so great? No....he used a rack

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Marshall , MO
      Posts
      699
      Is the rack a bolt in deal or is frame modification required? I assume the figures you gave are for stock spindles and steering arms. What about aftermarket spindles ATS, fatman etc.? I realize that each will be different so is the rack adjustable to get the specs stated above?
      Brad Shepard
      69 Malibu
      Marshall, MO

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      26
      Shep,
      It is a bolt on....no mods needed, it comes with a new aluminum TC pump, brackets, hoses, steering shaft. My specs are based on factory spindles. If your using aftermarket spindles that maintain the stock steering arm location its the same.
      I still cant understand the logic that a 40 year old steering design is as good as our updated kit. Just look at a center link design(steering box) and you'll see all the extra moving parts. Im not say Lee's boxes are bad, Im saying the center link design is bad. Its hard to argue that no modern car uses that design. Even in racing.....yes NASCAR still does, but any real road race car uses rack and pinion steering.....

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Seattle
      Posts
      35
      So i have been doing some reading on the Unisteer kit, and I like it. My questions are, Im planning on laying frame, flat out on the ground, this may constitute some engine K-member modification, as well as drop spindles. do you have some very specific install pics of the rack on a 64 or 65 chevelle, and how much would this kit cost including pump, shipped to seattle.

      Tony
      1964 Chevelle 2dr Wagon.. Pro-Touring bound
      1967 Mercury Cougar (PT)

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      2,413
      I would call for pricing. Steeryourite whats your name

      If Im correct I believe Factory five racing..Heidts... Alston.. And Art Morrison use variouse Unisteer/ Maval products as well. Polaris also
      Nothing says "I built this" better than tool marks and dykem blue..

      Follow my 3 link build. https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=61592

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Orlando, Fl
      Posts
      1,229
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by steeryourite
      Oh....When Kyle Tucker and Detroit Speed designed there new front end for Camaros, why didnt he use the same 600 box that is supose to be so great? No....he used a rack
      I don't think anyone is going to doubt that a R&P is preferred when building a custom frame, i.e. Detroit Speed. The fact of the matter is that a R&P uses fewer moving parts. They are more direct and are far more mechanically efficient.

      I think the R&P retrofit kits have been subject to a bad reputation since all of the early players were peddling street rod stuff and not concerned about the actual performance and design of the whole thing. So, if someone were to bring to the table a properly engineered rack that will put up to track abuse and provide optimal geometry, I think many of the naysayers will go away.

      Steeryourite, can you provide some detailed pics of the mounting bracket?

      Oh, and if you can figure out how to get a rack with proper geometry into a stock framed 2nd gen Camaro, then you will definitely have my interest.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      26
      Wagon,
      You can download the install instructions from our web site. Ill send you the link. Download the PDF. It says 68-72, but its the same for all A bodies.
      http://www.unisteer.com/help/index.p...nloads&_a=view
      The cost is $1774, and that includes everything, Pump, Hoses, Pulley, Pump Bracket, Reservoir, Steering Shaft. Ill give you the discount we were running on Pro Touring which was 10% off and free freight.
      Lowbuck,
      Same goes for you, Im Dave Batke but Ive informed my office staff that you guys may be calling and yes we supply Alston, Heidts, TCI, Morrison, and many others.

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Pittsburgh, PA
      Posts
      125
      steeryourite, I've been reading and chasing rack and pinion install threads for a month now and as of this morning, I was leaning toward the lee box from ATS. My situation is a bit different because I have an LS1 in a 70 nova. My oil pan is already modified for the drag link since I've been driving the car for two years now. Some other posts I've read on Ls1tech mention grinding your banjo fittings and grinding and cutting motor mounts to make clearance. That scared me away. If I'm paying $1000 (or more) for this kit, I would like it to bolt up and work. Do you recommend any certain vendors motor mount plates to work best with the conversion? How does the rack feel with a stock 99 LS1 PS pump? I currently have a GM 2 1/2 turn box in it, so will I feel a great improvement over this box? Also wondering will the Lee box have much of an improved feel over the gm quick ratio box....your time is appreciated.
      Mark
      Mark


      70 Nova, Hotchkis springs and sway bar GW uppers, Bilsteins, , sub connectors, Smooth firewall hidden wiper motor, LS1, 425 rwhp, 175 NOS Ridetech 4 link HQ Coilovers, Mini tubs, 315's. Ridetech billet gas cap, FLT level 5 4L60E, Yank

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      Twinsburg OH
      Posts
      28
      Quote Originally Posted by TitoJones
      our 670 box will feel exactly like your R&P kit will, and will do it for almost $500 less. There are much better ways to spend $1000 than going to a rack on a stock frame.
      Tyler
      Tyler,

      With all due respect this statement is a little vague because simply bolting a box on a car with used frontend parts is indeed cheaper, but that is a "apples to oranges" comparison when you compare it to our rack kits. Our rack kit obviously replaces ALL of the steering parts (Centerlink, Pitman & Idler Arms, Inner & Outer Tie Rods & Adjusting Sleeves).

      These parts can really add up (usually $350-$500.00 or even more).

      As a Unisteer salesman, I try to ask our customers if they have recently replaced these items and if they have I suggest our 600 box which is the great deal at only $449.00 (with the proper rag-joint & hose fitting adapters).

      http://www.unisteer.com/mm5/merchant..._Code=UNISTEER

      Throw in the Pro-Touring discount and that is an incredible $404.10 shipped to your door.

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com