Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 22
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States

      does X-11 mean its an SS for 69 Camaro

      With regard to a 1969 Camaro, if it says X-11 on the cowl tag does that nessessarily mean it is a SS?
      If not, does this mean anything important?
      Thanks

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      St.Anne Il
      Posts
      3,924
      Country Flag: United States
      no x11 is a style trim group..not a ss.. here a site that will help decode all info on camaros.. http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml click on cowl tag and go down tword bottom it will tell you what the codes mean..x11 is really common on alot of camaros..

      Darrin Stalnecker
      1969 Camaro Convert full pt pr
      2007 Corvette Supercharged
      1968 Camaro LS1 T56
      http://www.fquick.com/dropit69


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Location
      Nyköping, Sweden
      Posts
      292
      Country Flag: Sweden
      X11 can be a SS350 but it is not certain. Only about 10% of the X11 cars was SS350.

      To verify it as a SS350 there are items on the car that needs to be checked. One such thing is that SS cars had discbrakes.

      It is easier to say what it isn't. It is not a Z/28, SS396 or a Pace Car.


      Jan
      Jan Suhr
      Nyköping, Sweden
      1969 Pro touring Camaro Z/28 LS1/T56
      Scandinavian Pro Touring Forum protouring.se

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks a lot.
      Guy says the car does not have discs but claims it is supposed to because it has a porportioning valve.
      He says it has a 10 bolt non posi and multi leafs. Sounds like a non SS, I am going to check out that link. Thanks again.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Feb 2003
      Location
      Houston, TX
      Posts
      3,446
      Country Flag: United States
      All SS cars had the 12-bolt and front disks. The proportioning valve is located on the side of the subframe, on the driver's side just under the floorpan area.

      Another tell-tale sign is the dual exhaust hangers which should be factory present, above the rear axle.
      Co-Founder, LS1TECH.com


      Forged Wheel Dealer, Contact me for a quote!
      www.DV8Motoring.com

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Nine Ball
      The proportioning valve is located on the side of the subframe, on the driver's side just under the floorpan area.
      Thank you. Should this be the only proportioning valve, or should there be another one below the master cylinder?

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Atlanta GA
      Posts
      7,477

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Location
      Nyköping, Sweden
      Posts
      292
      Country Flag: Sweden
      Quote Originally Posted by Nine Ball
      All SS cars had the 12-bolt and front disks. The proportioning valve is located on the side of the subframe, on the driver's side just under the floorpan area.

      Another tell-tale sign is the dual exhaust hangers which should be factory present, above the rear axle.

      There are documented SS350 with 10-bolt, if they had a PowerGlide transmission they could get a 10-bolt. Not very common but they do exist.


      Jan
      Jan Suhr
      Nyköping, Sweden
      1969 Pro touring Camaro Z/28 LS1/T56
      Scandinavian Pro Touring Forum protouring.se

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      I have a 67 SS with manual steering, manual drum brakes, 12 bolt, and mono leaf springs with the RH traction link. But CRG says for 1969 discs were required on an SS, multi leaf and 12 bolt would come on a 69 SS350.
      Here's a handy chart of options: http://www.camaros.org/diffs69.shtml
      Last edited by David Pozzi; 01-02-2008 at 10:50 PM.
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States
      ok. I got the cowl tag info:
      ST6912437NOR346700BDY
      TR7115757PNT
      06A X11

      With the small quantities of exceptions with the options, is there any way to know for sure either way?

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Location
      Nyköping, Sweden
      Posts
      292
      Country Flag: Sweden
      Quote Originally Posted by David Pozzi
      Discs were not required on an SS. I have a 67 SS with manual steering, manual drum brakes, 12 bolt, and mono leaf springs with the RH traction link. I'm pretty sure that 1969 was the same, except by then multi leaf and 12 bolt would come on a SS350.
      David, you are right about the 67. It wasn't required for the 68 either. But for 1969 modelyear it was an required option for SS cars.


      Jan
      Jan Suhr
      Nyköping, Sweden
      1969 Pro touring Camaro Z/28 LS1/T56
      Scandinavian Pro Touring Forum protouring.se

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Location
      Nyköping, Sweden
      Posts
      292
      Country Flag: Sweden
      Quote Originally Posted by steve671
      ok. I got the cowl tag info:
      ST6912437NOR346700BDY
      TR7115757PNT
      06A X11

      With the small quantities of exceptions with the options, is there any way to know for sure either way?
      Trimtag says:
      Built in Norwood, Ohio Bodynumber 346700
      Tr 711, Stadard black vinyl interior
      57 57, Fathom Green paint
      06A, Built in First week of June 1969
      X11, well that has been discussed in earlier posts of this thread.


      Not much information to go on but that was all GM provided back then.

      Jan
      Jan Suhr
      Nyköping, Sweden
      1969 Pro touring Camaro Z/28 LS1/T56
      Scandinavian Pro Touring Forum protouring.se

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by jannes_z-28
      Trimtag says:
      Built in Norwood, Ohio Bodynumber 346700
      Tr 711, Stadard black vinyl interior
      57 57, Fathom Green paint
      06A, Built in First week of June 1969
      X11, well that has been discussed in earlier posts of this thread.


      Not much information to go on but that was all GM provided back then.

      Jan
      Thanks Jan. So is there no way to know for sure if this is or is not a real SS.

      I am thinking it is not because of the drum brakes, 10 bolt, lack of proportioning valve at the subframe and rareness of the option.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      I thought X-11 meant it was a Chevy Citation.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States
      So I went and looked at the car today and also noticed that the front sway bar was very small (1/2inch or 5/8 at the most). I don't know if this is another indication that it is not an SS.
      This in addition to the other things leads me to believe that this is not an SS. Also, this car was way more rusted than the guy led me to believe; so I am going to pass on this one and keep looking.
      Thanks again for all of the help.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      1,978
      If you feel the outside of the frame on the drivers side rear wheel well there is an about 1 1/2" square reinforcement patch welded to the outside of the frame to reinforce where the exhaust hangar attaches. It's only on dual exhaust cars. Z-28's, SS's all have it..
      Bob "cooter" Johnson

      (Disclamer: Any and all "questionable" comments made by Bob Johnson, Redneck, are to be taken as good natured Good 'ol boy humor. If I offended you, please get a sense of humor...)

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Sweden
      Posts
      214
      Country Flag: Sweden
      Also notice that you should have at least a 300hp/350ci engine in a SS. (1969) (If You still have the original engine block)

      L48 , L35 , L34 , L78 , L89
      http://www.camaros.org/engine.shtml

      ---------------------------------------------

      http://www.chevymania.com/

      "PARTS ID"

      Scroll to : "SUFFIX CODES" down left.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Location
      Bay Area, CA
      Posts
      104
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for the additional info.

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,984
      Country Flag: United States
      since we are talking about these 69 cars, is it not correct that the SS cars were the horse power cars and the rally sports the stripes/hideaway lights with some handling? Then the Z28 was even better handling?

      This stems from Steve's comment about the small front sway bar on this supposed SS car. I was thinking that at SS could easily come with a crappy suspension since SS was not a suspension package.

      Thanks guys.
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      USA
      Posts
      4,462
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by WS6
      since we are talking about these 69 cars, is it not correct that the SS cars were the horse power cars and the rally sports the stripes/hideaway lights with some handling? Then the Z28 was even better handling?

      This stems from Steve's comment about the small front sway bar on this supposed SS car. I was thinking that at SS could easily come with a crappy suspension since SS was not a suspension package.

      Thanks guys.
      '69 Rally Sport Cars had a lot a trim options. ( Hideaway headlights , headlight washers , deluxe chrome exterior trim , etc.. ) Not necessarily disc brakes or suspension improvements.

      '69 SS cars had performance options like 350 hi-po or 396 hi-po engines and associated transmissions and rearends to go with them. and disc brakes.

      The Z/28 option was a 302 hi-po engine , 4-speed manual, 12 bolt rearend, and suspension upgrades too.
      Jeff Tate
      U.S.A.
      "The best thing about participating in these events is that you get to hang out with a group of intelligent like minded people who live to achieve things in their lives. You won't find a lazy, mean, or dumb bone in their bodies." Bret Voelkel, RideTech

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com