Results 1 to 20 of 39
Thread: Sprayable Body Filler
Hybrid View
-
12-04-2007 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Bellevue, MI
- Posts
- 53
Gordz32, that is a lot of material to pile onto bare metal. Not to mention plenty of solvent evaporation. I guess I can't see as to what needs that kind of fill. Oh, and be careful with that vette, less is more with fiberglass. C3's are better than the early cars but they still can soak up material like a sponge. Absolutely no reason to use any kinds of spray poly on a c3. Vette bond for the seams and a couple rounds of epoxy work great on vettes. I guess when I do a car I want it to look the same in 20 years but some of the procedures I see around here are suspect to redo in 5years. I'm not trying to insult anyone, just my opinion from experience.
-
12-04-2007 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 1,027
duesey please show us all your killer metal work, you must be better then troy, berman, ring bros etc, you must have it figured out please show us
12-05-2007 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 282
I'll agree withe the bond but epoxy no way! The solvents used to spray go directly into glass? no gel coat? just like k36 or similar ...looks good till it gets out in the sun - then watchout! sandscratchs , bonding seams repairs ...they all come back.
Originally Posted by Duesey2
Poly or gel/combo only way to go!
12-05-2007 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- NW Arkansas
- Posts
- 1,742
I have my bull**** flag at full mass......lets see some pics. I got money that says
Originally Posted by Duesey2
A: There is more than 1/16 of filler/product on your car
B: Its not straight
C: all of the above
You cant come into the body section of a Forum and claim you dont use more than 1/16 of filler on a car? Are you building plastic models? lets see some pictures
Im going with C
12-05-2007 #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 282
Originally Posted by Travis B

I guess there are varrious degrees of "straightness".
12-05-2007 #6





Reply With Quote