Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11

    Thread: 295/40/17????

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      198

      295/40/17????

      Anyone running a 295/40/17 on anything? If so, can you please let me know what brand and what the real measured height is? My math tells me that it should measure 11.5 wide and 26.2 tall, but that same math told me that my 315/35/17s should have been 25.6 tall and they are more like 24.25 unmounted. Thanks guys. -Scott

      68 Chevelle SS396. Pro-touring in Progress
      Pro-jected 396, TKO 600, 3.90'd 12 bolt, LS1 brakes.


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Oregon
      Posts
      1,773
      Country Flag: United States
      Mounted diameters are going to vary with the wheel width... what width wheels are you putting these on?
      It's what I does.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      198
      Well I bought the 315's, and then decided that I can really only afford Coys at 9.5"..... Obviously too narrow of a wheel and the 315's seem to be too short of a tire.

      I would like to split the difference and thought the 295/40 would fit on the 9.5 without looking retarted/unsafe and get me another inch of height. Unfortunatly I have only been able to find one tire that size on tirerack and its a slick. Thoughts?
      68 Chevelle SS396. Pro-touring in Progress
      Pro-jected 396, TKO 600, 3.90'd 12 bolt, LS1 brakes.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      198
      Mickey Thompson is showing a 295/45 drag radial

      http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...53925_-1_36685

      Anyone running these? Anyone want to buy some brand new 315's?
      68 Chevelle SS396. Pro-touring in Progress
      Pro-jected 396, TKO 600, 3.90'd 12 bolt, LS1 brakes.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Livermore, Ca
      Posts
      78
      I just picked up a set of the 295/45/17. They are true to there size specs, which is on there web site http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/s...ETStreetRadial Running them on a 71 camaro with vintage wheel works 17x9.5 with a 6 inch back spacing. No rubbing issues. I will post some pics when I get the front wheels mounted this next weedend.

      Here’s great web site that helped me in fitting and comparing tire and rim size. http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2007
      Location
      Tinley Park, IL
      Posts
      1,220
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by marc_b
      I just picked up a set of the 295/45/17. They are true to there size specs, which is on there web site http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/s...ETStreetRadial Running them on a 71 camaro with vintage wheel works 17x9.5 with a 6 inch back spacing. No rubbing issues. I will post some pics when I get the front wheels mounted this next weedend.
      I'll be following this. What is your total width on them, sidewall to sidewall, mounted on the 9.5" rims? I'd like to put them on my lowered 69 Cutlass.
      ​
      Nick ~
      1969 Cutlass

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      198
      Thanks Marc. I ordered a set yesterday that should arrive tomorrow. I also plan I running them on 9.5" wheels.
      68 Chevelle SS396. Pro-touring in Progress
      Pro-jected 396, TKO 600, 3.90'd 12 bolt, LS1 brakes.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Livermore, Ca
      Posts
      78
      cool man... post some pics when you get them mounted

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      198
      I don't have the wheels yet, but here are some pics comparing them unmounted

      315/35/17 Dunlop 24.25" tall

      295/45/17 MT ET Street Radial 26.75" tall
      Attached Images Attached Images    
      68 Chevelle SS396. Pro-touring in Progress
      Pro-jected 396, TKO 600, 3.90'd 12 bolt, LS1 brakes.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Posts
      6
      I have a 68 Chevelle SS that I building similar to yours. I was planning on running 315's. Did you only go to the 295s b/c of the cost of 17x11 wheels? How is your rear fender clearance with what backspace you are using? Do still have the tires?
      Thanks I can't wait to make these improvements to mine also.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      198
      I went with the taller tire for a couple of reasons.
      1) Yes, the cost of 11" wide wheels was more than double what I could justify for 1 component. I'm not a flashy guy, so Big $$ wheels do very little for me.

      2) Our Chevelle wheel wells are fairly long (front to back), and the short 315 looked like a spare. From behind or at any ANGLE, they look sweet, but from a 90* side view, sorry, not enough tire.... I don't care how much you lower it.

      3) I have replacment quarters on my car, and I'm not sure if they are hung tighter than factory quarters or what, but it was going to be a TIGHT FIT once the car was lowered enough to fix #2) from above.

      I have already sold and shipped the 315's, and look forward to mounting up these 295's. It will be a while before my car is drivable again to give any feedback on the tires..... but they look cool!
      68 Chevelle SS396. Pro-touring in Progress
      Pro-jected 396, TKO 600, 3.90'd 12 bolt, LS1 brakes.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com