Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Los Angeles, CA
      Posts
      450
      Country Flag: United States

      Steering arm/wheel issue

      I have a 69 Nova that is running the fatman Gforce tall spindle w/ 2" drop along with Edelbrock 454 wheels (17X8, 4.5 BS) and I have an issue with the steering arms/tie rods contacting the rim. My temporary (2 years temporary) solution was to use 1/2" spacers between the spindle and steering arm which moved my arms much closer to the stops on the frame, effectivly killing my turning radius which sucks in a daily driver that sees u-turns. I love the wheels and cannot get them in any other size, stance, and ride on my car and was wondering if there were any steering arms that might fit or any other ideas to restore my turning radius.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Can you post a picture of the rear side? Its a common problem that can be fixed with a shorter steering arm. They are rare and expensive if you do happen to find one on ebay. See David Pozzi's site for info on this. http://www.pozziracing.com

      if you do find one make sure you match the part numbers. Theres alot of fraud going on.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Central Valley Ca.
      Posts
      414
      Country Flag: United States
      Maybe you can get another spindle with less drop?
      1969 Camaro..getting closer to being done..I think
      1994 Camaro... Future N.A.S.A racer... maybe
      Victory Circle South West Tour race car (SCCA)
      2006 SS Trailbrazer (Wifes)
      2007 LTZ Chev Silverado 4x4 with the sports suspension package

      Greg is my other name...

      Web page..
      http://www.youtube.com/user/itlbtu?feature=mhee

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Orlando, Fl
      Posts
      1,229
      Country Flag: United States
      I agree with the above poster. I would swap back to stock spindles and use proper lowering springs to get the front down to where I wanted it.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      The sticky at the top of this section is exactly what you need to reasd along with David's site

      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=16609
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Arvada, Co
      Posts
      2,119
      Country Flag: United States
      Just lose the drop spindles and be done with it. Moving the steering arms is a bad band aid fix at best.
      Brian


      I have an unlimited budget. That bad part is I have already used it up.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Los Angeles, CA
      Posts
      450
      Country Flag: United States
      I thought all the negative drop spindle commentary pertained to stock height drop spindles, not the tall spindles, though now I will really need to rifle through the drop spindle thread. The handling of the car is where I want it and I have no negative steering/handling charaistics as far as a street car is concerned. Realistically, all I need is a narrower rim, but I love the style of my rims and they are not available in anything but 17X8 with the aforementioned BS. I was looking at the unisteer rack and pinion kit and the steering arm looks as if it would clear. Has anyone have any expirience with these units?

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      Can you get them in a 17 x 7 or are they discontinued? Then you could run 4" backspace which might give you the clearance you need. I don't know what tire size you are running, but a 245/45 will fit no problem.

      It's funny that the makers of drop spindles don't check this stuff. Why does it have to be 2" drop anyway? They should just make at as low as you can and still fit.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Los Angeles, CA
      Posts
      450
      Country Flag: United States
      As far as I know, edelbrock 454s or and of its ultra wheels look-alikes were never made in a 17X7. I have thought of trying to get the rim narrowed, but everyone insists insists they would have to re-hoop the thing and it is a one piece wheel. I wonder why they can't slice an inch out of the hoop I have on the back side of the rim...

    10. #10
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by carguy502
      I thought all the negative drop spindle commentary pertained to stock height drop spindles, not the tall spindles, though now I will really need to rifle through the drop spindle thread. The handling of the car is where I want it and I have no negative steering/handling charaistics as far as a street car is concerned. Realistically, all I need is a narrower rim, but I love the style of my rims and they are not available in anything but 17X8 with the aforementioned BS. I was looking at the unisteer rack and pinion kit and the steering arm looks as if it would clear. Has anyone have any expirience with these units?
      If you narrow the rim, especially on the front of a nose heavy car, traction and handling will suffer. Nevermind the terrible geometry and probable massive bumpsteer you have with the current spacers. A Drop spindle is a drop spindle. Being taller only moves the LBJ point up, but it still puts the spindle shaft 2" higher in relation to the LBJ regardless of overall height. This is a form over function modification only! There is a reason the guys @ ATS only built in 7/8" or less (correct me if I am a little off) into the AFX upright.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Boulder, Colorado
      Posts
      192
      Quote Originally Posted by 6'9"Witha69
      There is a reason the guys @ ATS only built in 7/8" or less (correct me if I am a little off) into the AFX upright.
      The way I understand it the drop was needed to clear the big C5/6 bearing pack and was kept as minimal as funtionally possible. I can't wait to bolt mine up.

      What I don't understand is why someone doesn't simply make a 1.5 inch taller, no drop conventional spindle with revised steering arm mounting to fix the suspension and steering geometry issues. Seems like a great alternative to those who do not want the added expense of wheels and brakes that the ATS spindle requires. I still haven't got mine on because other stuff keeps taking my Forgeline cash. It seems the only wheels that clear the C5 brakes are REALLY expensive.
      Eric

      69 Camaro - LT1 w/ 700R4, DSE springs, swaybar and Konis. Still rockin' it old school with 15" wheels and 60 series tires.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com