Results 1 to 20 of 28
Thread: Can Ammeter Run Parallel?
-
07-06-2007 #1
Can Ammeter Run Parallel?
my car is '61 GM with an ammeter in the dash. the ammeter does not have values on the gauge, just charge or discharge.
i'm going to put in a 94 amp 12SI alternator, and i do not want to wire through the ammeter, as it could potentially be too much for the wiring. the original wire is prob 10 gauge.
but, could i wire a heavy gauge wire (maybe 8) from BATT term on alternator directly to battery terminal, and also run parallel to that, the 10 gauge wire through a 50 amp fuse, through the ammeter back to battery terminal?
that way, most the current would take the easiest path via 8 gauge wire, and the balance taking the long route through more resistive wire would maintain the functionality of the dash gauge (remember - gauge has no values)?
thanks, Scott.
-
07-06-2007 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 334
Hey Scott,
I don't have real experience with this, but it seems to me that the ammeter will only read what is going through it, and if you have 2 branches, than the current will always choose the path of least resistance, just like water does in a river channel.
All the current out of the battery/alternator must go somewhere, and if you add all the current flows up, they will total what is going out the battery/alternator.
So, I think the answer to your question would be no, you can't wire it in parallel and expect to read the other wire.
I think in your case you are best off with a voltage meter. MAD electrical has information on these, and if it's not on their website, than I have it here in their little booklet that I purchased.
Just keep in mind the thing about least resistance. That is where the current will go.
07-06-2007 #3thx for the reply Karch. right... the meter would not read all the current. but remember, the gauge does not have values. so... if i'm charging 65 amps, and 40 is taking the high road, and 25 is taking the low road, the meter would register 25, but without numbers, it wouldn't matter. it would only read directionally. in fact, 25 amps would prob be nearly full blast on the gauge. what i would mainly want to know, is that 'some' current would still take the more resistive route. this scheme is mostly just to save myself from having a totally dead gauge in the dash.
Originally Posted by Karch
i was thinking i could 'tune' how much goes through either circuit by size of direct wire, and or a resistor in either wire. for instance, if in the example above, 40 goes through fat wire, 25 goes through ammeter but the ammeter pins against full current, and i want it to read about 2/3 on the meter, then i could use a heavier gauge wire for the direct wire to positive battery so that more current would take that route, and less through the meter.
this is my thinking, i just don't know if there is a reason it would not work.
07-06-2007 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Marshall , MO
- Posts
- 699
Electricity like water is lazy and all of it will always take the path of least resistance. You could maybe have the gage reworked to read voltage and then wire it in parallel.
Brad Shepard
69 Malibu
Marshall, MO
07-06-2007 #5shep-
so, are you saying that in my example above, if the fat direct can handle all the 65 amps, then 65 amps would take that route, and 0 amps would take the meter route?
thx, Scott.
07-07-2007 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Marshall , MO
- Posts
- 699
What I am saying is that no matter what size the cable all the current is going to try to pass through it, and none will go through your gage.
Brad Shepard
69 Malibu
Marshall, MO
07-07-2007 #7I tested this. I think my idea will work. Check this out....
on my convertible (same year/model), i already converted to alternator. this is a car with very low current demand (all stock), so i only put on a 63 amp alternator. i wired it fully through the original ammeter because under full current load, the original wiring through the firewall can handle the load. so, my "BATT" terminal from alt is wired with 10 gauge wire through firewall, through ammeter, back into engine compartment, and onto the battery positive terminal post where starter wires to.
TEST....
turned on lights with car off to drain the battery a bit. the ammeter drops about to 1/2 between no current and fully discharge. leave lights on for about 3 mins. then, i turn on car, and the ammeter reads about 3/4 between no current flow & full charge. but, if i connect a heavy gauge battery jumper between the "BATT" terminal and the battery positive terminal at starter post, then the ammeter drops to about 1/4 between no current & full charge. as soon as i disconnect the jumper, the ammeter jumps back up to 3/4 charging. if i turn off car, with the jumper connected, and lights on, the discharge is almost 1/4 discharge. as soon as i take jumper off, the discharge is back to 1/2. this works in both directions.
when car is off, or battery is charged, the ammeter settles back into the 'no current' point (but actually ignition is using very little that does not register).
the bubble top i am building will have heavy current demands from EFI & electric fan. i'm going to use a DC control at fan so startup isn't big, but i think this will work to have 2 paths of charging. i'll also have a volt meter as part of the add-on cluster just under the dash.
Scott.
07-07-2007 #8Shep- totally agree electricity takes path of least resistance. but, i think the reason this works, is because as soon as current begins to flow through the jumper cable, this *is* resistance, and all of the sudden, the marginal addition of current has an unused path through the ammeter that it can take. if my handheld digital ammeter was heavier duty, i would measure the amount of amps taking either path, but i suspect the path via the jumper was more amps than the 10 gauge wire through ammeter. this sort of showed up in the fact that ammeter dropped from 3/4 to 1/4 when jumper added.
07-07-2007 #9



Reply With Quote